Turn on thread page Beta

Going down on girls - do all boys do it? watch

Announcements
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Schrödingers Cat)
    In the least rude way possible have you given thought that this could be factor in to why you're single?
    In the politest possible way: I’ve never been dumped (for any reason), so I’m not too sure where you’re going with this.. :dontknow:

    Spoiler:
    Show
    I'm single because of queen-bee's general inability to materialise (I date other women but haven't been looking to enter a relationship with any of them)

    only 25% of girls can actually orgasm from non-clitoral stimulation. Thus you haven't made 75% of girls you've been with orgasm :holmes:
    The former statement is about right, in my experience, but regarding the later:

    1) The female orgasm is not the centre of my universe, I don’t necessarily care if a girl climaxes and do not consider it equivalent to male orgasm and hence a (e.g. biological/reproductive) necessity/reasonable expectation (tend to describe it as being tantamount to more of a 'bonus')

    2) Who said anything about non-clitoral stimulation alone? More than one way to skin a cat my friend..

    Give a girl good oral and she'll keep coming back for more
    Granted, I am somewhat blessed in the manhood department, so perhaps this is less generalisable than t’would seem, but: give a girl a good seeing to, and let her know who’s boss, and she’ll be compelled to come back for more, almost irrespective of whether she: A) Climaxes from a straightforward good old rooting; B) Climaxes at all (depends on the girl, of course)

    (Original post by Blue_Mason)
    you do not need to go down to fully satisfy a woman
    (Original post by falloutboyyy)
    Seriously though oral is amazing you are no sex expert neither am I but from experience, it is amazing
    Blue_Mason is correct, in the main; in my experience if a girl is able to climax at all then it’s always possible for her to get off e.g. with a little extra ‘hands on’ where necessary (does not necessitate using your mouth). Without getting into detail/wishing to appear to gloat, I'll just say that some of the best experiences some girls out there have had in the sack have involved a 'hands on' approach, sans lips-to-lips :pierre:
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    if you're not comfortable with it, TELL HER. no one can force you to do it, and if they try, leave them. discuss what you're both comfortable with
    • Section Leader
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Section Leader
    I think this men vs boys rhetoric is a little immature. It seems to me it's like anything else, i.e., it's governed by preference.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by miser)
    I think this men vs boys rhetoric is a little immature.

    Definitely. Real men don't argue over what makes somebody a man or a boy. Only little boys do that.



    :flute:
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by e aí rapaz)
    Definitely. Real men don't argue over what makes somebody a man or a boy. Only little boys do that.

    :flute:
    Nice Irony.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Foo.mp3)
    In the politest possible way: I’ve never been dumped (for any reason), so I’m not too sure where you’re going with this.. :dontknow:

    Spoiler:
    Show
    I'm single because of queen-bee's general inability to materialise (I date other women but haven't been looking to enter a relationship with any of them)

    The former statement is about right, in my experience, but regarding the later:

    1) The female orgasm is not the centre of my universe, I don’t necessarily care if a girl climaxes and do not consider it equivalent to male orgasm and hence a (e.g. biological/reproductive) necessity/reasonable expectation (tend to describe it as being tantamount to more of a 'bonus')

    2) Who said anything about non-clitoral stimulation alone? More than one way to skin a cat my friend..

    Granted, I am somewhat blessed in the manhood department, so perhaps this is less generalisable than t’would seem, but: give a girl a good seeing to, and let her know who’s boss, and she’ll be compelled to come back for more, almost irrespective of whether she: A) Climaxes from a straightforward good old rooting; B) Climaxes at all (depends on the girl, of course)

    Blue_Mason is correct, in the main; in my experience if a girl is able to climax at all then it’s always possible for her to get off e.g. with a little extra ‘hands on’ where necessary (does not necessitate using your mouth). Without getting into detail/wishing to appear to gloat, I'll just say that some of the best experiences some girls out there have had in the sack have involved a 'hands on' approach, sans lips-to-lips :pierre:
    oh for goodness sake just lick a ****ing fanny you ****

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by miser)
    I think this men vs boys rhetoric is a little immature. It seems to me it's like anything else, i.e., it's governed by preference
    So if a guy expresses a 'preference' e.g. for quiet/wallflower submissive types, because they make him feel non-threatened/secure then we may infer nothing about how masculine he may be perceived as being?

    Sure, making oversimplified/damning sweeping binary generalisations is immature, but making more nuanced observations re: personality traits associated with particular attitudes toward issues e.g. associated with serving female desires by sticking your face in a historically/physiologically rather unusual place, seems perfectly mature/legit to me :dontknow:

    (Original post by e aí rapaz)
    Real men don't argue over what makes somebody a man or a boy
    (Original post by Eveiebaby)
    Nice Irony
    :laugh:

    (Original post by RobML)
    oh for goodness sake just lick a ****ing fanny you ****
    1. I’ve feasted on fanny before, my fwend. No need to get so salty *if you'll pardon the pune*

    2. Would you consider it appropriate to issue the same instruction to a girl debating the merits in performing oral sex on a man, I wonder?
    • Section Leader
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Section Leader
    (Original post by Foo.mp3)
    So if a guy expresses a 'preference' for quiet/wallflower submissive types, because they make him feel non-threatened/secure then we may infer nothing about how masculine he may be perceived as being?

    Sure, making oversimplified/damning sweeping binary generalisations is immature, but making more nuanced observations re: personality traits associated with particular attitudes toward issues e.g. associated with serving female desires seems perfectly mature/legit to me :dontknow:
    Ah, no I was talking about the dichotomy between 'boys' who don't go down versus 'men' who do.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Eveiebaby)
    Nice Irony.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Thanks. I try my best. :hat2:
    • Section Leader
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Section Leader
    (Original post by e aí rapaz)
    Thanks. I try my best. :hat2:
    And ironically you probably weren't trying that hard at all.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Foo.mp3)
    1. I’ve feasted on fanny before, my fwend. No need to get so salty *if you'll pardon the pune*

    2. Would you consider it appropriate to issue the same instruction to a girl debating the merits in performing oral sex on a man, I wonder?
    It's just banter m8. Why are you so averse to a bit of tongue-to-fanny action anyway?
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    Amazed how many guys don't go down or do it just to get BJs. Oral (giving, not receiving) is my favourite type of sex. I'd happily give up everything else and just go down on my girlfriend every time.

    All other kinds of sex are like watching a black and white silent movie on a small screen. You see what happens when your partner climaxes, but that's it. Go down on her and you get a totally immersive experience. Taste, texture, smell, plus when she cums, it's happening right in front of your face. It's like going to one of those IMAX 3D giant screen cinemas.

    The female orgasm is an amazing thing that we can never experience. The nearest we can get is oral. So why would we want any other kind of sex? Except if we're trying to conceive kids, obviously.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mark19)
    Amazed how many guys don't go down or do it just to get BJs. Oral (giving, not receiving) is my favourite type of sex. I'd happily give up everything else and just go down on my girlfriend every time.

    All other kinds of sex are like watching a black and white silent movie on a small screen. You see what happens when your partner climaxes, but that's it. Go down on her and you get a totally immersive experience. Taste, texture, smell, plus when she cums, it's happening right in front of your face. It's like going to one of those IMAX 3D giant screen cinemas.

    The female orgasm is an amazing thing that we can never experience. The nearest we can get is oral. So why would we want any other kind of sex? Except if we're trying to conceive kids, obviously.

    Why do you feel the need to go into such immense detail?I mean what kind of man would only like to preform oral on his girlfriend?
    You should think twice before encouraging other young men to commit such questionable acts.
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blue_Mason)
    Why do you feel the need to go into such immense detail?I mean what kind of man would only like to preform oral on his girlfriend?
    You should think twice before encouraging other young men to commit such questionable acts.
    Questionable acts oral sex isn't a crime or something to be ashamed of.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by keturah)
    Questionable acts oral sex isn't a crime or something to be ashamed of.


    Well for one it is an unhygienic act that is potentially dangerous, as you run the risk of getting a bacterial mouth infection.
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blue_Mason)
    Why do you feel the need to go into such immense detail?I mean what kind of man would only like to preform oral on his girlfriend?
    You should think twice before encouraging other young men to commit such questionable acts.
    "Questionable acts"? Why? Because it's about enjoying female sexuality and doesn't involve a girl laying back while some uptight guy pumps away?
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blue_Mason)
    Well for one it is an unhygienic act that is potentially dangerous, as you run the risk of getting a bacterial mouth infection.
    That's a lie......
    • #17
    #17

    you're cute
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mark19)
    "Questionable acts"? Why? Because it's about enjoying female sexuality and doesn't involve a girl laying back while some uptight guy pumps away?

    Well I am just adding my input, as I have been blessed with the talent to satisfy a woman without having to resort to oral sex.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Eveiebaby)
    That's a lie......

    Tell me, how is that a lie?
 
 
 
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: June 2, 2018
Poll
Cats or dogs?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.