Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Attempt)
    I've already answered them.
    No you didn't. The one where I asked you in bold how you prefer to accept random strangers quotes rather than the PM, Mayor AND the Met police put together.

    Answer that.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by karl pilkington)
    erm of course it serves a benefit it is not some weird coincidence it is linked to some attitudes of some cultures/religions towards western women

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...cumentary.html
    What is the benefit besides fuelling hatred towards muslims?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    The thread is going off topic no one has come up with an explanation why is is acceptable to physically attack people holding a peaceful protest against Islam and building more Mosques.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Butternuts96)
    No you didn't. The one where I asked you in bold how you prefer to accept random strangers quotes rather than the PM, Mayor AND the Met police put together.

    Answer that.
    Because the Met police, the PM and the mayor are all diverting attention away from the truth because they know that if they didn't condemn the idea that there would be an uproar in the liberal world. Stop being so naive and dense please.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Butternuts96)
    What is the benefit besides fuelling hatred towards muslims?
    To understand the wider implications of immigration into this country and to make women more educated that Muslim men may not share the same respect towards western women that western men have. The very 'not talking about it' attitude you are advocating is precisely what caused the police to take so long to do anything about it in the first place.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Attempt)
    Because the Met police, the PM and the mayor are all diverting attention away from the truth because they know that if they didn't condemn the idea that there would be an uproar in the liberal world. Stop being so naive and dense please.
    Conjecture. Please use facts.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Butternuts96)
    Conjecture. Please use facts.


    Naivety, please use your brain.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Attempt)
    Naivety, please use your brain.
    No seriously please use facts. Do you not know what conjecture means? Do I have to spell it out for you?

    I have never thought this lowly of anyone on TSR besides you. You're not even an effective islamophobe, lol. You're letting your people down.

    Seriously though, I wants FACTS on how there are muslim no go areas.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Attempt)
    Just because it was written by Pamela Gellar doesn't mean it's false for ƒucks sake. What is with you muslims and discrediting everything that exposes your false death cult religion?

    I've provided 5 articles now supporting my argument that there are infact no go muslim areas. If you can't read them or find them, then that's YOUR problem, not mine.
    The articles you cited are terrible. Pamela Gellar's was no different, and that's unsurprising since nearly everything that comes out of her mouth is batshyt nonsense. This is a woman who was banned from coming to the UK due to her crazed conspiracy theories of Muslims practising "stealth jihad" and "taqiyyah". She also had a mad theory that Obama is a secret Muslim and the secret love child of Malcolm X :lol:

    Posting a link from her website just confirmed the type of person you are.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Attempt)
    Where the hell did I say i supported what Britain first did?

    I've said this before, STOP WITH THE SMEARS. I'm serious.

    You've called me a racist and a Britain first supporter, both of which are false.

    And you must be a true troll if you think raising awareness to the problems in the islamic community in the UK is infact making things worse and not better.
    And you accused people who stood up to you and other members making hateful generalisations towards Muslims of supporting Islamists. What goes around comes around.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WBZ144)
    The articles you cited are terrible. Pamela Gellar's was no different, and that's unsurprising since nearly everything that comes out of her mouth is batshyt nonsense. This is a woman who was banned from coming to the UK due to her crazed conspiracy theories of Muslims practising "stealth jihad" and "taqiyyah". She also had a mad theory that Obama is a secret Muslim and the secret love child of Malcolm X :lol:

    Posting a link from her website just confirmed the type of person you are.
    http://in.reuters.com/article/france...WM0N6?rpc=401&


    I Guess Reuters aren't credible now right?

    And please don't even start with the whole she's banned from the UK nonsense.

    Because the UK Is a place where people get arrested for quoting winston churchill, but Allow muslims to walk around central london wearing an ISIS Flag
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by karl pilkington)
    The thread is going off topic no one has come up with an explanation why is is acceptable to physically attack people holding a peaceful protest against Islam and building more Mosques.
    Maybe because most of us do not believe Britain First's claim that the protest was peaceful?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WBZ144)
    And you accused people who stood up to you and other members making hateful generalisations towards Muslims of supporting Islamists. What goes around comes around.
    Are you Justin timberlake now?
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Attempt)
    http://in.reuters.com/article/france...WM0N6?rpc=401&


    I Guess Reuters aren't credible now right?

    And please don't even start with the whole she's banned from the UK nonsense.

    Because the UK Is a place where people get arrested for quoting winston churchill, but Allow muslims to walk around central london wearing an ISIS Flag
    When was someone arrested for quoting Winston Churchill? And supporting ISIS has become a criminal offence. The others are right; you are VERY ignorant when it comes UK law and politics.

    I did not ask for another story, I was simply pointing out that the fact that you linked the website of a woman who wants to nuke innocent people and is clearly a hateful bigot says a lot about you.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WBZ144)
    When was someone arrested for quoting Winston Churchill? And supporting ISIS has become a criminal offence. The others are right; you are VERY ignorant when it comes UK law and politics.

    I did not ask for another story, I was simply pointing out that the fact that you linked the website of a woman who wants to nuke innocent people and is clearly a hateful bigot says a lot about you.
    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014...ing-churchill/

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...ice-criticised

    I guess the ignorant one here is you and the 3 morons.




    Linking a website written by a hate filled bigot doesn't change the fact that what's she's reporting here is true.


    Now leave me alone and go continue swimming in your cesspool of ignorance and naivety.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Attempt)
    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014...ing-churchill/

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...ice-criticised

    I guess the ignorant one here is you and the 3 morons.




    Linking a website written by a hate filled bigot doesn't change the fact that what's she's reporting here is true.


    Now leave me alone and go continue swimming in your cesspool of ignorance and naivety.
    Of course you will link far-right websites which conveniently leave out crucial details. Winston Churchill was far from perfect; he had views on Indians and Muslims that would very much qualify as bigoted and would be seen nowadays as inciting hated. Weston was arrested for using those particular infamous quotes, not because the quotes came from Churchill.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-27186573

    It has been wrongly suggested that Mr Weston was arrested for reciting passages written by Winston Churchill. I understand he was not welcome outside the Winchester Guildhall, the Police were called and he was asked to move on. I also understand that he was not prepared to move on and was arrested for this reason.

    Members of the public are of course at liberty to debate issues of importance to them in private or public spaces. However, there must be a level of decorum and decency.

    Hampshire Constabulary has an obligation to ensure action is taken if decency or safety is put at risk and, if there is any reason to suspect they have intervened unnecessary, this will be investigated.

    As far as I am aware, this is not so in this case. With the local and European elections coming up, it is important to register that there is a great deal of politically motivated spin going on at the moment which it is having a significant impact on local policing – both in terms of vital frontline rescourse and reputation.
    - Hampshire Police Commissioner
    http://www.hampshire-pcc.gov.uk/Your...ul-Weston.aspx

    That was one incident which the police were criticised for, compared to how many where people were arrested for supporting ISIS? Using one example to pretend that this is the norm makes you appear dishonest.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by karl pilkington)
    The thread is going off topic no one has come up with an explanation why is is acceptable to physically attack people holding a peaceful protest against Islam and building more Mosques.
    Exactly


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WBZ144)
    Maybe because most of us do not believe Britain First's claim that the protest was peaceful?
    have you seen any of their protests all they do is hold a banner up and shout if they had been violent someone else would have filmed it and posted it
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Whilst there are certainly less people in the Christian faith who regularly attend church, if there was as many and a group of Muslims protested against Christianity and building churches in the same way, then I imagine the reaction would be quite similar. All Britain First does is incite hatred and really they should just be ignored.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by karl pilkington)
    have you seen any of their protests all they do is hold a banner up and shout if they had been violent someone else would have filmed it and posted it
    They were looking for a fight. Don't try and defend them. They were blocking the entrance to the mosque. BLOCKING the entrance. FACT. They wanted to invoke violence. Stop denying the facts to satisfy your hatred.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Brussels sprouts
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.