You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Mega A Level Maths Thread MK II Watch

1. (Original post by MathsNerd1)
What do you mean?

Posted from TSR Mobile
2n is the sumation of all the coeffecients of a binomial expansion. So you can try to prove it by expanding anything which is raised to a power>4. I'm just suggesting a solution, so I'm not exactly sure wether I'm right or wrong
2. (Original post by MathsNerd1)
What do you mean?

Posted from TSR Mobile
He means the question doesn't require induction, but in my defence, you asked for a proof by induction question
3. (Original post by Felix Felicis)
He means the question doesn't require induction, but in my defence, you asked for a proof by induction question
Oh okay and I did indeed, just not quite sure how to even attempt this one :-/

Posted from TSR Mobile
4. (Original post by Felix Felicis)
Well yeah but how much effort do you need to put in to write a random number and then copy and paste it xD
Ctrl+V doesn't really take more effort than typing '1'
5. (Original post by justinawe)
Ctrl+V doesn't really take more effort than typing '1'
Shush Fine fine I concede defeat
6. (Original post by MathsNerd1)
Oh okay and I did indeed, just not quite sure how to even attempt this one :-/

Posted from TSR Mobile
Spoiler:
Show

What's another way of expressing ?

7. (Original post by MathsNerd1)
What do you mean?
Ah I should have read the preceding posts, if you're practising induction then carry on. I just meant that induction seems a waste of time on this one, because you can prove the inequality by simply re-writing it.
8. (Original post by justinawe)
Spoiler:
Show

What's another way of expressing ?

Erm (K +1)K! ? I've never really understood how to manipulate factorials :-/

Posted from TSR Mobile
9. (Original post by Lord of the Flies)
...
I was wondering...would you mind having a look at this problem? Proof by example's not permitted apparently
10. (Original post by MathsNerd1)
Erm (K +1)K! ? I've never really understood how to manipulate factorials :-/

Posted from TSR Mobile
Ok, what've you got so far?
11. (Original post by Felix Felicis)
question
rational+irrational=irrational
where and as they are rational

this means

However at the start of the eq we stated that b= irrational is irrational! This is contradicting so the sum must be irrational

I think I did it right
12. (Original post by Felix Felicis)
I was wondering...would you mind having a look at this problem? Proof by example's not permitted apparently
I did not say that proof by example is not allowed. As my friend who gave me the question said that there is an another way of solving it. He did give a hint related to complex numbers so this must be the way

Proof by example is all right, you just want to find an another solution for it.
13. (Original post by Felix Felicis)
Ok, what've you got so far?
I've got pretty much no where as I'm unsure how to prove on side is greater than another :-/ Could you work through a solution to show me how it's done and I'll see if I'm able to follow it?

Posted from TSR Mobile
14. (Original post by MAyman12)
I did not say that proof by example is not allowed. As my friend who gave me the question said that there is an another way of solving it. He did give a hint related to complex numbers so this must be the way

Proof by example is all right, you just want to find an another solution for it.
That's what I've tried but I wasted most of today trying to and I just want to put my mind to rest.

(Original post by MathsNerd1)
I've got pretty much no where as I'm unsure how to prove on side is greater than another :-/ Could you work through a solution to show me how it's done and I'll see if I'm able to follow it?

Posted from TSR Mobile
I take it you've gotten to the inductive hypothesis that ?

Well, to complete the inductive step, you want to show that

Can you think of how to get to from ?
15. (Original post by MathsNerd1)
Erm (K +1)K! ? I've never really understood how to manipulate factorials :-/

Posted from TSR Mobile
Yes.

It's because,

16. (Original post by Felix Felicis)
That's what I've tried but I wasted most of today trying to and I just want to put my mind to rest.

I take it you've gotten to the inductive hypothesis that ?

Well, to complete the inductive step, you want to show that

Can you think of how to get to from ?
Isn't it
Spoiler:
Show
?
17. (Original post by Felix Felicis)

I take it you've gotten to the inductive hypothesis that ?

Well, to complete the inductive step, you want to show that

Can you think of how to get to from ?
I keep forgetting that what I've assumed in n=K has to be used in the inductive step too, my mistake :-/

Posted from TSR Mobile
18. (Original post by justinawe)
Yes.

It's because,

Okay, thanks I think I can see how to prove it all now

Posted from TSR Mobile
19. (Original post by Felix Felicis)

I take it you've gotten to the inductive hypothesis that ?

Well, to complete the inductive step, you want to show that

Can you think of how to get to from ?
Okay I thought I got it but I couldn't make any sense of it. To express (K+1)! = K!(K+1) but do I now use the fact that K! > 2^k in my induction step, if so then how exactly as this inequality seems to be making me quite cautious

Posted from TSR Mobile
20. (Original post by MathsNerd1)
Okay I thought I got it but I couldn't make any sense of it. To express (K+1)! = K!(K+1) but do I now use the fact that K! > 2^k in my induction step, if so then how exactly as this inequality seems to be making me quite cautious

Posted from TSR Mobile
Ok:

i) How do you get from to ?

ii) How do you get from to ?

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: July 10, 2013
Today on TSR

### What is the latest you've left an assignment

And actually passed?

### Simply having a wonderful Christmas time...

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• Poll
Useful resources

Can you help? Study help unanswered threadsStudy Help rules and posting guidelinesLaTex guide for writing equations on TSR

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.