Yes but usually when people are well of there's no desire for a revolution or to 'rebel' plus these so called rebels in libiya are in the minority despite what the media will have you believe so why did NATO feel the need to help them when the majority of libiyans were happy or okay if how things were before(Original post by Squidgyness)
How does any of that have anything to do with 'FREEDOM'?
I am fed up hearing this. All it means is that they are supposedly well off - it does NOT mean they are free.
Who is to say this will not continue under a democratic regime?
So many people on this forum seem willing to trade democracy for a handout. It's a worrying sign for the future.
What ever their reasons were I'm pretty sure they weren't moral reasons, far from it
Was NATO justified in Libyan intervention? watch
View Poll Results: Was NATO justified?Not at all1254.55%Yes, even when the targets were not military1045.45%