I have to object to the post above that Warwick law school is in every single magic circle target list - that is a sweeping generalisation. Even if MC firms do send a couple of HR bods along to the student law soc once in a while, that is absolutely no guarantee that you'll get offered something against candidates from top international law schools. The MC milkround extends far and wide for the off-chance that these grad recruitment people will find the odd seemingly stellar candidate from some of the more mid-range law schools (such as Warwick), and then see how they fair given a chance. Warwick law is not top draw - let's be clear about this. If you look at the QS results, you'll see Warwick law on the slide internationally, and if you look at NSS results for the past 5 years (with its 80% + response rate among finalists) you'll see how consistently disappointed law graduates have been with the teaching and the school.
Don't make it hard on yourself by applying to Warwick Law when you can go somewhere better with the same grades; don't waste a UCAS slot by applying to an institution that discriminates on the basis of where your parents chose to live or which school you went to.. avoid Warwick law school - its failings are only going to get more exposed when the new Teaching Excellence Framework is introduced in Autumn 2017. If you go to Warwick law school - they'll be questions as to how good your knowledge of the subject is and whether you were offered a place on the course not because of your ability, but because of what your parents did or didn't do for a living.