erm, let me go and think on that one(Original post by Occams Chainsaw)
I've got a good log question that my maths lectures couldn't/wouldn't answer for me so I'm wondering if you can/will please!
Why do negative base values sometimes work but sometimes not? I presume it's got something to do with complex numbers but I can't make the connection tbh.
another erm ... though I do know how to derive CoMs somewhere at the back of my mindSooooo many things annoy me about A Level maths like this! Like why the CoM of a semicircle is 4(r)/3(pi)
Do you mean as an antiderivative or why it gives area through thatand why exactly the way we integrating (namely dividing my the new power) actually works.
The trig functions occur naturally like pi ... they are just ratiosOr how sine is actually derived (not that circle on an axis thing, that's cheating!).
stop asking hard questions in the holidaysMechanical use of the principles is stupid.. We need to know why, I think! Maybe I should be able to work it out for myself but I am far too lazy and probably not clever enough to do it!

TenOfThem
 Follow
 85 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to TenOfThem
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 21
 10042013 19:28

User990473
 Follow
 27 followers
 0 badges
 Send a private message to User990473
Offline0ReputationRep: Follow
 22
 10042013 19:30

User990473
 Follow
 27 followers
 0 badges
 Send a private message to User990473
Offline0ReputationRep: Follow
 23
 10042013 19:34
(Original post by TenOfThem)
Do you mean as an antiderivative or why it gives area through thatLast edited by User990473; 10042013 at 19:38. 
TenOfThem
 Follow
 85 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to TenOfThem
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 24
 10042013 19:35

Indeterminate
 Follow
 162 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Indeterminate
 Political Ambassador
Offline3ReputationRep:Political Ambassador Follow
 25
 10042013 19:37
For example
So it's pretty pointless to think of negative bases.Last edited by Indeterminate; 10042013 at 19:41. 
 Follow
 26
 10042013 19:40
(Original post by Eilidh.DearX)
Okay, so here is my working:
2log3 y  log3(y+4) = 2
log3 y^2  log3(y+4) = 2
log3( y^2 / y+4 ) = 2
Take 3 to the power of both sides to give
3^ (log3 y^2 / y+4 ) = 3^2
y^2 / y+4 = 9
multiply through by y + 4
y^2 = 9 (y+4)
y^2 = 9y = 36
y^2  9y 36 = 0
(y  12) (y + 3) = 0
so y = 12, 3
can't do a negative number with logs, so y = 12 is the answer
Hoped this helped
btw, it wasn't me who negged you.Last edited by nm786; 10042013 at 19:42. 
User990473
 Follow
 27 followers
 0 badges
 Send a private message to User990473
Offline0ReputationRep: Follow
 27
 10042013 19:43

User990473
 Follow
 27 followers
 0 badges
 Send a private message to User990473
Offline0ReputationRep: Follow
 28
 10042013 19:44
(Original post by Indeterminate)
It's all well and good saying something works by the "face value" definition of it, but we also have to consider everything that goes with it.
For example
So it's pretty pointless to think of negative bases. 
Indeterminate
 Follow
 162 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Indeterminate
 Political Ambassador
Offline3ReputationRep:Political Ambassador Follow
 29
 10042013 19:47
(Original post by Occams Chainsaw)
I was just interested! Anomalies bug me!
By the way,
using the definition that
which is, in fact, a consequence of Euler's identity. 
Eilidh.DearX
 Follow
 0 followers
 0 badges
 Send a private message to Eilidh.DearX
Offline0ReputationRep: Follow
 30
 10042013 21:18
(Original post by nm786)
you can't post full solutions! instead you have to guide the OP to the answer; read this: http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/wiki...elp_Guidelines
btw, it wasn't me who negged you.
Oh, oops! I didn't know you weren't supposed to. But how can you help people if you have to 'dance round answers as it were'?
Don't worry I wasn't going to assume you did, I haven't even looked at my post, must have loads of negs lol xD Am I going to get into trouble? 
davros
 Follow
 40 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to davros
 Study Helper
Offline16ReputationRep:Study Helper Follow
 31
 10042013 21:21
(Original post by Occams Chainsaw)
Why do negative base values sometimes work but sometimes not? I presume it's got something to do with complex numbers but I can't make the connection tbh.
Sooooo many things annoy me about A Level maths like this! Like why the CoM of a semicircle is 4(r)/3(pi) and why exactly the way we integrating (namely dividing my the new power) actually works. Or how sine is actually derived (not that circle on an axis thing, that's cheating!).
For any base, we usually define
where I'm using log to denote the natural (base e) logarithm. So think about how this will work when a is negative! (and yes, it does involve complex numbers)
From a practical point of view, think about how you graph for a real number a. If a is positive then you get a nice smooth curve, you can work out the answer for integer x directly, and interpolate the points in between (for example if x is rational, you know how to work out xth roots etc). However, how would you work out ?
By the laws of indices , but how are you going to evaluate that 2nd factor? Again, this leads you into the realms of complex numbers.
For the centre of mass, I'm not quite sure what you're asking. The CoM has to be something  if it were 7pi/43 you'd be asking why it was that value! Or are you asking how to get the answer for the CoM? This is done by integration  typically explained in M3 (at least in the old Edexcel book I have).
Integration and powers? Simple answer: if you define indefinite integration as the reverse process to differentiation, and you know that differentiation brings down a power and reduces the power by 1, then you can see why integration must involve division by (power+1). Deeper answer: if you didn't know anything about differentiation but defined (definite) integration as the area under a curve, then it's still possible to get an answer for the area under but it takes more work and a knowledge of infinite sums and limits.
Definition of sine? Well an analyst defines it by an infinite power series and then proceeds to show that it satisfies all the properties you'd expect of it!
The school method starts with the definition as a ratio of sides in a rightangled triangle, but clearly this only makes sense for acute angles. So then you have to extend the definition to be the ycoordinate of a point moving round the unit circle  this gives you your periodicity etc. There's a geometric argument you can use to show that sinx/x > 1 as x>0 and this gives you your derivative etc.Last edited by davros; 10042013 at 21:25. 
davros
 Follow
 40 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to davros
 Study Helper
Offline16ReputationRep:Study Helper Follow
 32
 10042013 21:25
(Original post by Eilidh.DearX)
Oh, oops! I didn't know you weren't supposed to. But how can you help people if you have to 'dance round answers as it were'?
Don't worry I wasn't going to assume you did, I haven't even looked at my post, must have loads of negs lol xD Am I going to get into trouble?
Most people who post in the Maths forum are either (a) lazy and want the answers given to them, but they go away quickly when they realize that isn't going to happen; or (b) stuck at some point and in need of a hint or a confidence boost. If they're given a bit of a nudge in the right direction they can usually go on by themselves and solve the problem!! 
Eilidh.DearX
 Follow
 0 followers
 0 badges
 Send a private message to Eilidh.DearX
Offline0ReputationRep: Follow
 33
 10042013 22:09
(Original post by davros)
You won't "get into trouble"  unless you do it repeatedly
Most people who post in the Maths forum are either (a) lazy and want the answers given to them, but they go away quickly when they realize that isn't going to happen; or (b) stuck at some point and in need of a hint or a confidence boost. If they're given a bit of a nudge in the right direction they can usually go on by themselves and solve the problem!! 
User990473
 Follow
 27 followers
 0 badges
 Send a private message to User990473
Offline0ReputationRep: Follow
 34
 10042013 22:29
(Original post by davros)
These are all really good questions, and certainly not things you should be able to work out by yourself (unless you are descended from Newton!)
For any base, we usually define
where I'm using log to denote the natural (base e) logarithm. So think about how this will work when a is negative! (and yes, it does involve complex numbers)
That makes perfect sense now. I hadn't thought about that definition of before. It's actually pretty interesting!
From a practical point of view, think about how you graph for a real number a. If a is positive then you get a nice smooth curve, you can work out the answer for integer x directly, and interpolate the points in between (for example if x is rational, you know how to work out xth roots etc). However, how would you work out ?
By the laws of indices , but how are you going to evaluate that 2nd factor? Again, this leads you into the realms of complex numbers.
I did notice the graph didn't form a line, but rather a scattering of points.
For the centre of mass, I'm not quite sure what you're asking. The CoM has to be something  if it were 7pi/43 you'd be asking why it was that value! Or are you asking how to get the answer for the CoM? This is done by integration  typically explained in M3 (at least in the old Edexcel book I have).
I wondered why it was 3r/4pi. I know it had to be something but it just didn't look right when I first saw it. That may sound a little arrogant but usually I can happily see that something is right/wrong intuitively  in A Level maths, anyway. That probably isn't something I should rely on but it does help! Integration? I tried doing it in ratios but it got very complicated very fast!
Integration and powers? Simple answer: if you define indefinite integration as the reverse process to differentiation, and you know that differentiation brings down a power and reduces the power by 1, then you can see why integration must involve division by (power+1). Deeper answer: if you didn't know anything about differentiation but defined (definite) integration as the area under a curve, then it's still possible to get an answer for the area under but it takes more work and a knowledge of infinite sums and limits.
What I am interested in is why when you intergrate, say you then divide by the new power, in this case, 2. I know it's the opposite of differentiation but then I don't know why you multiply in that either, so it doesn't really help!
Definition of sine? Well an analyst defines it by an infinite power series and then proceeds to show that it satisfies all the properties you'd expect of it!
The school method starts with the definition as a ratio of sides in a rightangled triangle, but clearly this only makes sense for acute angles. So then you have to extend the definition to be the ycoordinate of a point moving round the unit circle  this gives you your periodicity etc. There's a geometric argument you can use to show that sinx/x > 1 as x>0 and this gives you your derivative etc. The point about the acute angles is why I got confused. It didn't make sense! In honesty, I'm going to have to read over that definition again and play around before I understand it but I appreciate the answer!
I hope you don't think it's rude to comment within your quote, sort of like how a teacher would mark an essay, because I think it makes a response so much more coherent!
Again, I really appreciate the help!Last edited by User990473; 10042013 at 22:32. 
davros
 Follow
 40 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to davros
 Study Helper
Offline16ReputationRep:Study Helper Follow
 35
 11042013 09:57
(Original post by Occams Chainsaw)
Thank you so much! If only my lecturers at college could give such good answers. I suppose they have to worry about the rest of the class being able to understand what's strictly on the syllabus before satisfying my curiosity!
I hope you don't think it's rude to comment within your quote, sort of like how a teacher would mark an essay, because I think it makes a response so much more coherent!
Again, I really appreciate the help!
The problem with the modern modular exam system is that you're permanently in a cycle of preparing for exams, taking exams, reviewing exams etc, so to be fair to teachers most of what they do now is highly constrained by the need to hit targets and teach to a test. I was fortunate enough to do fewer exams and read more outside the syllabus when I was at school.
If you've looked at differentiation from first principles, that should answer your question about multiplying by powers when you differentiate a power of x.
If I think of any better answers to your question I'll come back 
aznkid66
 Follow
 3 followers
 1 badge
 Send a private message to aznkid66
 Visit aznkid66's homepage!
Offline1ReputationRep: Follow
 36
 11042013 11:37
(Original post by Occams Chainsaw)
I've got a good log question that my maths lectures couldn't/wouldn't answer for me so I'm wondering if you can/will please!
Why do negative base values sometimes work but sometimes not? I presume it's got something to do with complex numbers but I can't make the connection tbh.
EDIT: ninja'dLast edited by aznkid66; 11042013 at 11:44. 
the bear
 Follow
 433 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to the bear
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 37
 11042013 11:42
(Original post by davros)
These are all really good questions, and certainly not things you should be able to work out by yourself (unless you are descended from Newton!)

User990473
 Follow
 27 followers
 0 badges
 Send a private message to User990473
Offline0ReputationRep: Follow
 38
 11042013 12:42
(Original post by davros)
No problem  it's good that you're asking questions; more people should do this.
The problem with the modern modular exam system is that you're permanently in a cycle of preparing for exams, taking exams, reviewing exams etc, so to be fair to teachers most of what they do now is highly constrained by the need to hit targets and teach to a test. I was fortunate enough to do fewer exams and read more outside the syllabus when I was at school.
If you've looked at differentiation from first principles, that should answer your question about multiplying by powers when you differentiate a power of x.
If I think of any better answers to your question I'll come back
As a maths undergraduate, did you have any opportunities to look at things like Game Theory when you were completing your degree? Right now I am looking at physics (because it's cool in general) and economics (because I love game theory) but figured that maths might be a good way to combine the two in their most theoretical forms! STEP is going to be a pain though! :/ 
davros
 Follow
 40 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to davros
 Study Helper
Offline16ReputationRep:Study Helper Follow
 39
 11042013 13:25
(Original post by Occams Chainsaw)
If everyone asked these sorts of questions then teachers would probably have a very hard time!
As a maths undergraduate, did you have any opportunities to look at things like Game Theory when you were completing your degree? Right now I am looking at physics (because it's cool in general) and economics (because I love game theory) but figured that maths might be a good way to combine the two in their most theoretical forms! STEP is going to be a pain though! :/ 
User990473
 Follow
 27 followers
 0 badges
 Send a private message to User990473
Offline0ReputationRep: Follow
 40
 11042013 13:46
(Original post by davros)
I must admit that games theory, optimization and the suchlike never really appealed to me. After my 1st year I mainly focused on theoretical physics courses, although I did attend number theory lectures as that always appealed to me. Ironically, I've now forgotten almost all the applied stuff I learnt owing to lack of practice, and I've started rereading stuff like analysis which I learnt at a hectic pace and never really appreciated!
Well, if I could have a split between physics and game theorytype stuff in the second year then that would be cool. I could then probably specialise in the third!
I've found the same as you with simple statistics etc that I had learnt at GCSE. I realised I've forgotten everything I learnt about probability which probably isn't very good!
Analysis and topology look pretty difficult! Because I don't see any real application it doesn't appeal to me as much as physics where I can learn something and say "oh, so that's how that works". I think that is more satisfying for me.

Central Lancashire (UCLan)

University of Derby

Mathematics with Physics (Including Year Abroad)
University of Essex

Mathematics and Computer Science
University of Oxford

Secondary Mathematics Education with QTS
Edge Hill University

University of Surrey

Spanish Studies and Mathematics
Lancaster University

Mathematics and Statistical Science
UCL

Keele University

Newcastle University
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
 SherlockHolmes
 Notnek
 charco
 Mr M
 Changing Skies
 F1's Finest
 rayquaza17
 RDKGames
 davros
 Gingerbread101
 Kvothe the Arcane
 TeeEff
 The Empire Odyssey
 Protostar
 TheConfusedMedic
 nisha.sri
 claireestelle
 Doonesbury
 furryface12
 Amefish
 harryleavey
 Lemur14
 brainzistheword
 Rexar
 Sonechka
 TheAnxiousSloth
 EstelOfTheEyrie
 CoffeeAndPolitics
 an_atheist
 Labrador99
 EmilySarah00