The Student Room Group

applying differential equations to real-life problems

Scroll to see replies

Reply 20
Original post by Alen.m
So basically it's a graph of y=30000-20000e^0.2tIn(0.9)? The reason im asking is because the text book stated it's a graph of e^0.2In(0.9t) which should definetely be different
Attachment not found


It's sloppy notation on their part, what they mean is e0.2ln(0.9)te^{0.2 \ln (0.9) t}
Reply 21
Original post by Zacken
It's sloppy notation on their part, what they mean is e0.2ln(0.9)te^{0.2 \ln (0.9) t}


how about if i wanna sketch the graph of y=30000-20000e^0.2In(0.9t), in this case actually as t increases the value of e^0.2In(0.9t) increases as well therefore the value of c will decrease and the graph would look like something like this?
Reply 22
Original post by Alen.m
how about if i wanna sketch the graph of y=30000-20000e^0.2In(0.9t), in this case actually as t increases the value of e^0.2In(0.9t) increases as well therefore the value of c will decrease and the graph would look like something like this?


Not quite, if you wanted to sketch that graph, as soon as t>1.12t > 1.12, the value for the exponential becomes positive, which makes 20000eblah>>30,00020 000 e^{\text{blah}} >> 30,000 so your whole thing becomes negative. It would look like this:

Reply 23
Original post by Zacken
Not quite, if you wanted to sketch that graph, as soon as t>1.12t > 1.12, the value for the exponential becomes positive, which makes 20000eblah>>30,00020 000 e^{\text{blah}} >> 30,000 so your whole thing becomes negative. It would look like this:



thanks
Reply 24
Original post by Zacken
Not quite, if you wanted to sketch that graph, as soon as t>1.12t > 1.12, the value for the exponential becomes positive, which makes 20000eblah>>30,00020 000 e^{\text{blah}} >> 30,000 so your whole thing becomes negative. It would look like this:



how about before 1.12 tho? the value of c getting smaller and smaller until t reaches 1.12 then it gets negative ?
Reply 25
Original post by Alen.m
how about before 1.12 tho? the value of c getting smaller and smaller until t reaches 1.12 then it gets negative ?


Yep.
Reply 26
Original post by Zacken
Yep.


Shouldnt it be something like this tho? Coz c start getting negative as t reaches 1.12 but on yours c is already negative before 1.12 image.jpg
Reply 27
Original post by Alen.m
Shouldnt it be something like this tho? Coz c start getting negative as t reaches 1.12 but on yours c is already negative before 1.12 image.jpg


That's correct. Look at the scale of my graph. :-)

Quick Reply

Latest