The job of the un is "To maintain international peace and security" this decision doesn't do that(Original post by 999tigger)
Do you undnerstand what it says?
The job of the committee is to make decisions based on public international law.
What is legally wrong with the decision?
Just because you dont like it doesnt mean its wrong.
Notwithstanding its non binding and advisory only.
UN are failing in its role. watch
- Thread Starter
- 29-03-2016 18:05
Online19Very Important Poster
- Very Important Poster
(Original post by joecphillips)
- 29-03-2016 18:08
The job of the un is "To maintain international peace and security" this decision doesn't do that
Go and read up.
- 29-03-2016 18:13
- 29-03-2016 18:41
It is a talking shop when you think about it if Isis is needing to be bombed in Syria isn't that what the un should do?
If camps are needed why are individual countries pledging money for them which still isn't enough. Is that what the un should be doing?
If they don't have the resources they are redundant in those roles and need reforming so they do have the resources to do it.
Posted from TSR Mobile
- 29-03-2016 23:23