Would you turn gay if there were no girls left? Watch

username1866585
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#21
Report 3 years ago
#21
(Original post by ivybridge)
The immaturity.
Pot, meet kettle.
0
reply
ivybridge
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#22
Report 3 years ago
#22
(Original post by XOR_)
It's not immature to be repulsed by a sexual act.
Well it kind of is? Vaginas are gross to me but I'm not repulsed by heterosexual or lesbian sex. It's just pathetic. And to say you wouldn't have sex with men if they were the only people on earth is utter *******s. I can comfortably admit, whilst I doubt I'd be that into it, I would have sex with women if it was only me and women left on the planet or just me and one girl.

Sort your insecurities out. Learn to be comfortable in your own skin; it does not mean you have to like it or will be called gay, child.
0
reply
Uncas
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#23
Report 3 years ago
#23
It depends on your libido. Men who become crazy when don't have a sex for a week would probably turn. On the other hand i know many "monk" people which they don't.
0
reply
ivybridge
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#24
Report 3 years ago
#24
(Original post by IAmNero)
In humans, it's a simple case of a person to person basis. Where one person might take a course of action, another might not, especially those with particular religious views.

And they aren't immature for thinking that, just because you are too narcissistic to accept people have another viewpoint doesn't make them immature
Pal? We are talking about a drastic, unimagineable, particular situation. I can accept the viewpoint in general day-to-day life - I would never have sex with a woman.

However, feeling literally sickened by consensual, pretty normal, sex between two people of the same-sex is pathetic.
0
reply
IAmNero
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#25
Report 3 years ago
#25
(Original post by ivybridge)
Well it kind of is? Vaginas are gross to me but I'm not repulsed by heterosexual or lesbian sex. It's just pathetic. And to say you wouldn't have sex with men if they were the only people on earth is utter *******s. I can comfortably admit, whilst I doubt I'd be that into it, I would have sex with women if it was only me and women left on the planet or just me and one girl.

Sort your insecurities out. Learn to be comfortable in your own skin; it does not mean you have to like it or will be called gay, child.
By name calling and getting angry it is demonstrating your own immaturity. People don't have to conform to your personal views of the world.
0
reply
ivybridge
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#26
Report 3 years ago
#26
(Original post by IAmNero)
By name calling and getting angry it is demonstrating your own immaturity. People don't have to conform to your personal views of the world.
Says the one who called me narcissistic? I am referring to this user's attitude. Not them personally.

Furthermore, you seem to forget we are talking about, again, an unimagineable predicament. NOT real life or the real world. Get over yourself.
0
reply
XOR_
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#27
Report 3 years ago
#27
(Original post by ivybridge)
Well it kind of is? Vaginas are gross to me but I'm not repulsed by heterosexual or lesbian sex. It's just pathetic. And to say you wouldn't have sex with men if they were the only people on earth is utter *******s. I can comfortably admit, whilst I doubt I'd be that into it, I would have sex with women if it was only me and women left on the planet or just me and one girl.

Sort your insecurities out. Learn to be comfortable in your own skin; it does not mean you have to like it or will be called gay, child.
Firstly I am comfortable in my own skin, just not in another man's.

Secondly, perhaps you don't view m-f sex the same way I do m-m and your assumption that it could be something I could just decide to do is not very open minded, it is not a choice.
0
reply
IAmNero
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#28
Report 3 years ago
#28
(Original post by ivybridge)
Pal? We are talking about a drastic, unimagineable, particular situation. I can accept the viewpoint in general day-to-day life - I would never have sex with a woman.

However, feeling literally sickened by consensual, pretty normal, sex between two people of the same-sex is pathetic.
Yes, but the fact is we are animals, and our instinct is to survive first, and then procreate. But if having intercourse with a male when being a male would not further spread the gene pool then it would be unlikely to happen. That's the way animal psychology works.

No, that is how YOU define 'normal'. In animals it is purely done as a dominance display, only humans do it for pleasure.
0
reply
ivybridge
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#29
Report 3 years ago
#29
(Original post by XOR_)
Firstly I am comfortable in my own skin, just not in another man's.

Secondly, perhaps you don't view m-f sex the same way I do m-m and your assumption that it could be something I could just decide to do is not very open minded, it is not a choice.
You are misconstruing sex with sexual orientation.
0
reply
IAmNero
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#30
Report 3 years ago
#30
(Original post by ivybridge)
Says the one who called me narcissistic? I am referring to this user's attitude. Not them personally.

Furthermore, you seem to forget we are talking about, again, an unimagineable predicament. NOT real life or the real world. Get over yourself.
I am capable of putting together a coherent argument based on facts however, your argument is based on "I disagree so you are immature".

What on earth are you on about, you simply cannot back up anything you are saying with biology or psychology.
0
reply
ivybridge
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#31
Report 3 years ago
#31
(Original post by IAmNero)
Yes, but the fact is we are animals, and our instinct is to survive first, and then procreate. But if having intercourse with a male when being a male would not further spread the gene pool then it would be unlikely to happen. That's the way animal psychology works.

No, that is how YOU define 'normal'. In animals it is purely done as a dominance display, only humans do it for pleasure.
I don't see anything as normal really. What I meant was not something bizzare like beastility or I dunno, something extreme.

Mate, animals have sex with their own gender a lot. Don't act like you have a clue, clearly not.
0
reply
IAmNero
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#32
Report 3 years ago
#32
(Original post by ivybridge)
You are misconstruing sex with sexual orientation.
The two are directly related...
0
reply
ivybridge
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#33
Report 3 years ago
#33
(Original post by IAmNero)
I am capable of putting together a coherent argument based on facts however, your argument is based on "I disagree so you are immature".

What on earth are you on about, you simply cannot back up anything you are saying with biology or psychology.
You literally don't even understand the context of the discussion.
0
reply
IAmNero
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#34
Report 3 years ago
#34
(Original post by ivybridge)
I don't see anything as normal really. What I meant was not something bizzare like beastility or I dunno, something extreme.

Mate, animals have sex with their own gender a lot. Don't act like you have a clue, clearly not.
Will ignore your first line as that part has reached it's end.

If you read a later reply I actually say it is a dominance display, not for pleasure, only humans do that.
0
reply
ivybridge
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#35
Report 3 years ago
#35
(Original post by IAmNero)
The two are directly related...
Related. Not the same.
0
reply
IAmNero
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#36
Report 3 years ago
#36
(Original post by ivybridge)
You literally don't even understand the context of the discussion.
You literally cannot put together an argument based on fact, your viewpoint is not fact, get your facts straight before arguing with someone who can substantiate an argument.
0
reply
cherryred90s
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#37
Report 3 years ago
#37
(Original post by XOR_)
I'd release my sexual tension by myself, using the remnants of females (aka porn).
Bullsh*t. Why would you watch porn for the rest of your life when you could have the real thing?
0
reply
XOR_
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#38
Report 3 years ago
#38
(Original post by cherryred90s)
Bullsh*t. Why would you watch porn for the rest of your life when you could have the real thing?
Well apparently I can't have the real thing because in this scenario all women are dead?
2
reply
IAmNero
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#39
Report 3 years ago
#39
(Original post by cherryred90s)
Bullsh*t. Why would you watch porn for the rest of your life when you could have the real thing?
Because it doesn't lead to procreation basic human psychology states that he likely won't.
0
reply
loveleest
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#40
Report 3 years ago
#40
LMAO, I mean you have straight men that have sex with other men in prisons to realse their sexual urges so what does that show.

Some of you guys are lying.
1
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Which party will you be voting for in the General Election?

Conservatives (160)
19.37%
Labour (420)
50.85%
Liberal Democrats (111)
13.44%
Green Party (46)
5.57%
Brexit Party (12)
1.45%
Independent Group for Change (Change UK) (4)
0.48%
SNP (14)
1.69%
Plaid Cymru (4)
0.48%
Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) (0)
0%
Sinn Fein (6)
0.73%
SDLP (1)
0.12%
Ulster Unionist (4)
0.48%
UKIP (8)
0.97%
Other (6)
0.73%
None (30)
3.63%

Watched Threads

View All