Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Johnson powder causes cancer? Watch

    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ihatePE)
    breathing cause cancer
    You are indeed very dumb
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mariam687)
    its ok, i used to eat vix..

    ukno tht strong jelly stuff u put on your throat and nose

    LOL

    Were you a special kind of child?
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blue_Mason)
    Were you a special kind of child?
    idk lol...

    it tasted gd back thn...
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Foo.mp3)
    You're free to quote whatever you like wherever you like - although I wouldn't recommend retrospective/mis-quoting m'dear (added some notes to the above to try to make it clearer what I was saying, tricky to word it concisely and not risk misinterpretation!)
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Essentially what I was suggesting was that once (other) major causes/contributory factors have been identified, and (hopefully) to a certain extent nullified (with the exception of things we can't do much about, like ageing), it's possible to envisage a world in which wireless radiation is still-more ubiquitous and, in this context, has risen to become the biggest residual cause/contributory factor (in terms of number of cases it impacts)
    Please see below:



    You'll find plenty of information about the professional services I provide in the appropriate thread

    I take care not to misinform and will never be pressured into abandoning a precautionary approach where human/animal welfare is concerned (TTIP style), sorry. I will freely exercise my right to share and comment upon all/any information at my disposal, however you, or any other individual/body, may feel about the available evidence. If you have any genuine concerns as to the validity of my sources then I welcome relevant well-meaning, depersonalised/non-accusatory feedback, rather than attempting puerile public defamation/point scoring
    You're well aware that I have major concerns about all the studies you've posted, of which almost none would pass as an undergraduate dissertation. You've offered one meta analysis which had a little merit, and at best that showed a duration-unknown, harm-unknown effect on sperm motility (but without excluding other more probable causes). There's no legitimate, convincing evidence here and that's why the experts say there is no known risk. You absolutely are misinforming people by implying there's evidence of any risk. You might as well advise people on the risk of pickled vegetables (which has the same scientific level of justification).

    Apologies for being unclear, I was asking about your professional qualifications, not the services you offer. That thread you linked to seems to state you've no qualifications except the university of life, which while extremely important in a counsellor, definitely doesn't qualify you to call yourself a health professional. You can skate by on using "relationship counsellor" because it's not a protected term, but that's pretty unethical of you to be honest. It usually means a person has been through years of formal counselling training and additional relationship-specific counselling training. What makes you different to a guy in the pub advising his friend on his relationship? For example, I have counselling, CBT and interpersonal therapy qualifications. I still wouldn't call myself a relationship counsellor as it would be a misleading representation of my abilities. What makes you a more capable person to work with a vulnerable patient than someone like me? And if the answer is "nothing", why do you set yourself up as someone who is capable?

    (I'm aware we're going off topic, so feel free to respond in whichever of those two threads you feel is most relevant, if you like.)
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by PangXie)
    What makes you a more capable person to work with a vulnerable patient than someone like me? And if the answer is "nothing", why do you set yourself up as someone who is capable?
    In the military world, such people are described as 'walts', people eager for the reflected glory / kudos that comes with the status, but have done none of the real work themselves.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by PangXie)
    x
    (Original post by Drewski)
    x
    Have partially responded in the appropriate thread, and will endeavour to respond to the rest in t'other appropriate thread in due course :yy:
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by loveleest)
    https://www.rt.com/usa/341649-ovaria...johnson-powder

    This powder apparently causes cancer and this lady got ovarian cancer from it and now the company has lost $55 million.

    It's shocking because I used to use it all the time when I was younger!
    What do you guys think?
    So does orange juice
    Online

    17
    ReputationRep:
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Has a teacher ever helped you cheat?
    Useful resources
    AtCTs

    Ask the Community Team

    Got a question about the site content or our moderation? Ask here.

    Welcome Lounge

    Welcome Lounge

    We're a friendly bunch. Post here if you're new to TSR.

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Write a reply...
    Reply
    Hide
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.