Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    is there anything you need explaining?
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    How do you decide which point to choose when working out internal forces?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mr Moon Man)
    How do you decide which point to choose when working out internal forces?
    I tend to start vertically at a point with just two opposing forces, but it makes no difference provided there's only 1 unknown at the point along the axis you're resolving.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    If a particle is stuck right at the end of the rod. Is there a reaction force
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    can someone explain question 3iv on Jan 13 paper. I think it's the only question of this type to have ever come up, where you have to specifiy the stable area for the centre of mass. I don't really understand the mark scheme but am I right in thinking you can just connect all of the points in contact with the ground, then shade the shape you create?

    Name:  Screen Shot 2016-05-17 at 21.24.18.png
Views: 187
Size:  239.4 KB
    Attachment 533451533453
    Attached Images
     
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 11234)
    If a particle is stuck right at the end of the rod. Is there a reaction force
    There is, but it doesn't affect anything because it's the force the rod is exerting and hence plays no part in moments or resolving (i.e: doesn't affect equilibria) since we are only concerned with the forces that is being exerted on the rod.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    3 iv was weird, my teacher went through it and thought it was a pretty bad question, will probably not come up again - examiner's report described it quite negatively. You were right in that you do just connect the points and shade it in, although for the second part you were meant to draw on the centre of mass and say it's stable because is within the shaded region.
    Name:  3iv.jpg
Views: 159
Size:  19.4 KB

    Probably too late for anyone to respond, but for part 1 b iii of the same jan 2013 paper you needed to find the frictional force which the markscheme allowed you to either consider impulse or find acceleration. I did it by stating the work done by friction was reponsible for the change in kinetic energy (friction was the only force involved). I belive this is a perfectly valid method and it got the right answer but it wasn't one of the methods listed in the markscheme and there was no comment saying alternate methods allowed, do you know if I would not get the mark or would they allow this?
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by bash!)

    Probably too late for anyone to respond, but for part 1 b iii of the same jan 2013 paper you needed to find the frictional force which the markscheme allowed you to either consider impulse or find acceleration. I did it by stating the work done by friction was reponsible for the change in kinetic energy (friction was the only force involved). I belive this is a perfectly valid method and it got the right answer but it wasn't one of the methods listed in the markscheme and there was no comment saying alternate methods allowed, do you know if I would not get the mark or would they allow this?
    Alex621 tagging to let you know your question was answered.

    Also, bash! - I think you'd get the marks for that, was does the examiner report say? The examiners receive a more detailed copy of the markscheme you see that outlines more alternative methods, so I'm fairly sure yours is fine.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    Alex621 tagging to let you know your question was answered.

    Also, bash! - I think you'd get the marks for that, was does the examiner report say? The examiners receive a more detailed copy of the markscheme you see that outlines more alternative methods, so I'm fairly sure yours is fine.
    Ah yeah, sorry I forgot to reply properly (don't post much).
    The examiner's report doesn't really say much about this question, it was only worth 1 mark (was only the first step of iii), but I'm worried the same situation could apply to a larger question. I believe I've seen similar questions that allow considering the change in KE, so it was weird that this one doesn't. Didn't know the examiners got a different markscheme, seems strange they'd put effort into creating a different one to upload publicly.
    I thought I'd heard before that using a correct method not listed would still get the mark but just wanted to check so I'm not worrying so much tomorrow
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by bash!)
    I thought I'd heard before that using a correct method not listed would still get the mark but just wanted to check so I'm not worrying so much tomorrow
    Yep, that's correct. Basically don't worry - what you did is fine (and what I would do, coming to think of it).
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Good luck everyone!
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Nearly everything was easy enough, but then there's Q4 parts one and two... o boi
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Did anyone get. 0.198 m for the energy question
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 11234)
    Did anyone get. 0.198 m for the energy question
    Yeah, I also know someone else who did too, so we're probably right.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    For the 2 marker involving Q in question 1 when an object is dropped off Q did the speed of Q change or stay the same?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    how did you guys prove that friction was present
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 11234)
    how did you guys prove that friction was present
    If it were a smooth plane, the velocity of the ball parallel to the plane would be unchanged by the collision. Therefore to show that it is not smooth (and therefore that there is friction) you just need to show that the horizontal elocity is not the same before as it is after. 10cos(60) is not equal to 6cos(40).
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Maths77)
    For the 2 marker involving Q in question 1 when an object is dropped off Q did the speed of Q change or stay the same?
    I said it stayed the same because no force acted on Q to change it's speed
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rawsonj)
    If it were a smooth plane, the velocity of the ball perpendicular to the plane would be unchanged by the collision. Therefore to show that it is not smooth (and therefore that that is friction) you just need to show that the horizontal elocity is not the same before as it is after. 10cos(60) is not equal to 6cos(40).
    I did that!!!! Thanks. I said that 10cos60 does not equal 6cos40 and then said something about impulse due to friction. Could I get 3 marks?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Was the coefficient of friction 1.57 and was the tension in one of the rods 394?
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Brussels sprouts
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.