x Turn on thread page Beta
 You are Here: Home >< Maths

# ..... watch

1. (Original post by iMacJack)
Yea, 64/75 not too bad for what everyone is finding a very hard paper
At least we tried out best right Mr D would be proud ?

Now for everyone that feels they did bad here is the annual Hitler reacts video:
2. (Original post by iMacJack)
well done mate

aaran got 75/75, unsurprisingly, he deserved it though to be fair
#

Yeah but kingaaran cheated
3. (Original post by Yunique)
Thoughts??
standard paper in my opinion, bit harder than the more recent ones.
4. (Original post by TeeEm)
Standard paper
Meh - it was harder than last years I am sure
5. Looks like a solid 69/75.

Haha...69.
6. 75/75 for me then... As usual
7. Thanks so much! Phew I think I dropped about 13 odd marks, hope for an A still then. I hope everyone is pleasantly surprised
8. (Original post by magicrazzaq)
75/75 for me then... As usual
Congrats bro. Retake or First Time?
9. 73/75 like I thought. I put too little effort in this module. Glad it's done.
Also Arsey made the same mistake loads made by not rounding sqrt (5)
10. (Original post by Arsey)
Here are my solutions to the FP1 paper.

Reasonable paper I thought, a few tricky bits
11. (Original post by magicrazzaq)
75/75 for me then... As usual
12. For question 7e, would just saying they are parallel with proof get 1 mark or two? Thanks
13. Best of luck to everyone for C2 - should be easier than this paper
14. For the geometrical relationship. shouldnt we be talking about the transformation?
15. Princepieman

I know how you're feeIing, I'm here for you if you ever wanna taIk
16. The question said 'using this value for a' - if we used say, a= '1' instead of -1, would we get the following 8 marks?
17. (Original post by carly1999)
For describing the geometrical relationship of the line segments, would you lose a mark for calculating the gradients and saying they were parallel, but not stating one was twice the length of the other?
Probably yes, it was a 2 mark question
18. Thank you Arsey! 61/75 not too bad
19. I plotted R as +5 not -5 (somehow) and stated they were perpendicular. So 2/3 for argand part and 0/2 for the following part I assume?
20. (Original post by iMacJack)
Best of luck to everyone for C2 - should be easier than this paper

Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: May 23, 2016
Today on TSR

### Loughborough better than Cambridge

Loughborough at number one

Poll
Useful resources

## Make your revision easier

Can you help? Study help unanswered threadsStudy Help rules and posting guidelinesLaTex guide for writing equations on TSR

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE