Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Thatredhead)
    I wrote about how the four year old jed (or Tom) viewed friendship as easily replaceable and revolving around play/activities. Then compared it to the seven year old and how he shared advice and was co operative in his interactions, and how he had a meaningful and more intimate bond with his friend as they had a similar interest and he was upset about him not being around. This suggested that children's friendships become more meaningful and the characteristics of the friend/similarities are more important. - I mean in so many words I said that. I just made sure I kept it related to the example, etc.
    Your answer sounds really good. I just said that the 4 year old was more flexible in friendship as he played with other children when his best friend was off from school and that the 7 year old focused on achievements with the games. I thought it was really unclear because I didnt understand if the question was saying these 2 were best friends and were comparing what they said about each other? I didnt understand the 3 mark question about the letter either I wrote about ethical issues
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Yehh I put something along those lines. But I also pit how as the age increases the nature of friendships also change as demonstated by *I forgot there names* i mentiones the stem alot too because u get marks for it

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    What else did people put in the 3 issues raised question for attachment

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I wrote about the true aim of the interview, the right to withdraw and the necessity of getting the parents' permission
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Yeh I put that too I said
    Debrief with an aim. Right to withdraw. Ethics. Deception and concent as they are under 16

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JJ_98)
    Your answer sounds really good. I just said that the 4 year old was more flexible in friendship as he played with other children when his best friend was off from school and that the 7 year old focused on achievements with the games. I thought it was really unclear because I didnt understand if the question was saying these 2 were best friends and were comparing what they said about each other? I didnt understand the 3 mark question about the letter either I wrote about ethical issues
    Hmm I don't know if they were referring to them being best friends together, and yeah I wrote about ethical issues as well - parental consent, right to withdraw, explaining the aim of the research
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by gemstone100)
    What did you guys put for the attachment bowlby question

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    I put C - Proximity
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by IzzyMae)
    I put C - Proximity
    Same
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    What are u guys aiming for. Im praying grade boundaries dont go up because they were pretty low last year

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by gemstone100)
    What are u guys aiming for. Im praying grade boundaries dont go up because they were pretty low last year

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    A or B, my class all did social development, schizo / mood disorders and substance abuse and thought the questions were pretty hard so I think the grade boundaries will be pretty low - same as last year.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    for anyone that did the schizo essay, were we meant to only evaluate the studies used or the explanations or could we do both?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by katiekt)
    for anyone that did the schizo essay, were we meant to only evaluate the studies used or the explanations or could we do both?
    I think both are fine; it didnt specify did it? I did a mixture anyway
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MatWhiteside)
    I think both are fine; it didnt specify did it? I did a mixture anyway
    no I didn't think it did!! that's good I did both too!
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Which 2 explanations did you pick? I did biological and sociocultural. But I wasnt sure if you had to do all of the explanations within those if that makes sense so like for biological explain genetics, brain chemicals and brain structure. I couldnt remember any studies my mind went blank so I just did the Gottesman twin study
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JJ_98)
    Which 2 explanations did you pick? I did biological and sociocultural. But I wasnt sure if you had to do all of the explanations within those if that makes sense so like for biological explain genetics, brain chemicals and brain structure. I couldnt remember any studies my mind went blank so I just did the Gottesman twin study
    I spoke to my psychology teacher about that, it depends how you word it. If you say the biological explanation as a whole and then state the sub parts of it eg, genes neurotransmitter levels its fine. However if you say the genetic explanation... the neurochemical explanation... the family dysfuntion expanation..etc its not so fine. Personally I did genetics and family dysfunction; to avoid thr whole issue.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MatWhiteside)
    I spoke to my psychology teacher about that, it depends how you word it. If you say the biological explanation as a whole and then state the sub parts of it eg, genes neurotransmitter levels its fine. However if you say the genetic explanation... the neurochemical explanation... the family dysfuntion expanation..etc its not so fine. Personally I did genetics and family dysfunction; to avoid thr whole issue.
    Ahhh okay, I started the essay by saying the biological explanations to schizophrenia include genetics, brain chemicals and brain structure and then all i spoke about was genetics gave a twin study and then spoke about the dopamine hypothesis and gave a few ao2 points like cause and effect and bio explanations allowed the development of drugs. then I spoke about family dysfunction and labelling. Do you think that sounds okay because I did relate it to Jay by saying his mother showed characteristics typical of a dysfunctional family and then said about the diathesis stress model and how his father was schiz so that may mean he was labelled as schiz too?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JJ_98)
    Ahhh okay, I started the essay by saying the biological explanations to schizophrenia include genetics, brain chemicals and brain structure and then all i spoke about was genetics gave a twin study and then spoke about the dopamine hypothesis and gave a few ao2 points like cause and effect and bio explanations allowed the development of drugs. then I spoke about family dysfunction and labelling. Do you think that sounds okay because I did relate it to Jay by saying his mother showed characteristics typical of a dysfunctional family and then said about the diathesis stress model and how his father was schiz so that may mean he was labelled as schiz too?
    Sounds good to me, with good linking back to the question as well I'm sure you'll be fine How're you feeling about unit 4?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MatWhiteside)
    Sounds good to me, with good linking back to the question as well I'm sure you'll be fine How're you feeling about unit 4?
    Thanks Im sure you did well too , ummm i dont really like the debates like the psychology a science debate throws me and those damn statistical tests are a *****! What about you? I have a business exam that day too so Im having to revise for everything in 4 days cus I left it so late
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    I did attachment forensics mood disorders.... my colly found it ok tbh appart from the odd question but still. Im hoping for at least a B too so im hoping it will stay the same 33 for a B

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Did you guys talk about expressed emotion in the schiz long answer?

    Posted from TSR Mobile
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Are unpaid trial work shifts fair?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.