Regressive left tries to twist Munich narrative to suit their agenda

Exactly this. Sky News for example, disgustingly announced it as "another suspected homegrown radicalised attack" when they first trailed it, a clear indicator that we were supposed to assume it to have been Islamist.

Honestly - it's not offensive or racist to assume that the nth terror attack of the week came from the same organisation as the others. Especially as the early information did seem to indicate that he was.

Gotta be honest, my initial reaction was: "here we go again...".

I fully expected it to be another ISIS inspired jihadi attack.

In this instance it seems he was just your typical mentally unhinged gun-spree attacker. With lone-wolf attacks it gets difficult to determine where mental illness ends and terrorism starts.

For example like the Joe Cox murder you can have a lone-wolf attacker, clearly mentally ill to the point of violent psychosis, and yet they'll be spouting some half-baked ideological stream of drivel.

I think that is a reality which goes as much for many lone-wolf Muslim attackers (radicals are well known for exploiting the vulnerable, mentally ill and retarded, so forth) as far right nut-bars or any other ideological influences.

Either way the spree of gun-attacks in the west lately is troubling, one wonders how long until the UK has one.

Maybe the stiff upper-lip reaction to 7/7 put the jihadis off, who knows.

The terrifying thing is, there is very little you can do to stop gun attacks like this one. I've always wondered why planes (especially since 9/11 and increased security) were so often targeted by terrorists- when it would be far easier to say leave a bomb in a very crowded street or something like that.

The terrifying thing is, there is very little you can do to stop gun attacks like this one. I've always wondered why planes (especially since 9/11 and increased security) were so often targeted by terrorists- when it would be far easier to say leave a bomb in a very crowded street or something like that.

According to TSRians, deporting all Muslims and banning all future Muslim immigration will prevent those attacks.

Lel

Well it would certainly stop the Muslim attacks. Don't see the point you're trying to make here?

No it won't. You don't need to be a resident to terrorise a country. Main 9/11 attackers were not US residents for example.

Yes but as you said, if Muslims weren't allowed in at all as some TSR users suggest, then that wouldn't have happened. You can't deny it would certainly decrease the volume of attacks.

Gotta be honest, my initial reaction was: "here we go again...".

I fully expected it to be another ISIS inspired jihadi attack.

In this instance it seems he was just your typical mentally unhinged gun-spree attacker. With lone-wolf attacks it gets difficult to determine where mental illness ends and terrorism starts.

For example like the Joe Cox murder you can have a lone-wolf attacker, clearly mentally ill to the point of violent psychosis, and yet they'll be spouting some half-baked ideological stream of drivel.

I think that is a reality which goes as much for many lone-wolf Muslim attackers (radicals are well known for exploiting the vulnerable, mentally ill and retarded, so forth) as far right nut-bars or any other ideological influences.

Either way the spree of gun-attacks in the west lately is troubling, one wonders how long until the UK has one.

Maybe the stiff upper-lip reaction to 7/7 put the jihadis off, who knows.

What wouldn't have happened? 9/11?

Of course 9/11 wouldn't have happened if Muslims had been banned from the US.

They learned to fly in US flying schools and boarded their planes in various US cities.

Kinda disgraceful how the regressive left leaped on some scraps of misinformation to make it appear that the shooter was a far-right nationalist.

Europe is in the midst of a radical Islam motivated onslaught, and the regressive left are clearly desperate to deflect attention away from it because it doesn't suit their irrelevant agenda, which is pretty unpleasant when you think about it. They're trying to divert attention away from a problem among an immigrant demographic which is killing hundreds and causing huge amounts of terror, to a reactionary problem with European culture/society which currently poses very little danger. It's sort of like a parent ignoring their child's cancer and focusing their attention on the fact that they sometimes get very unpleasant and destructive because of the hysteria the cancer causes. It was fairly obvious that it was never a far right attack. The Breivik attack was targeted at a particular group he was ideologically opposed to. The Joe Cox killing was perpertrated by someone who was ideologically opposed to her. It is Islamic terrorists who kill indiscriminately, so it was fairly obvious who the perp was from the start.

Maybe.

But what we notice all the time in the media is that lone-wolf Muslim attackers are 'radical Islamist attackers', whereas lone-wolf far-right attackers are 'mentally unhinged'.

Turns out it's not terorrism-related. Lone wolf.