Paedophile sisters who abused boy for over a decade spared prison after judge ruling

Perhaps. But this wasn't a woman when the first act was committed. It was a 14 year old girl.

But she also committed offences as an adult


Posted from TSR Mobile

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1641064/paedophile-sisters-who-abused-a-boy-when-he-was-aged-just-six-have-been-spared-jail-because-theyre-both-deaf/

unbelievable...

what on earth was the judge thinking ?

They got off lightly because they're deaf, not because they're women. What does feminism have to do with this?

Indeed. But only a fool would fail to consider the whole picture. This is why not everyone becomes a judge. Do you not question what has happened to a 14 year old child in order to exert this behaviour?

They got off lightly because they're deaf, not because they're women. What does feminism have to do with this?

Men Sentenced To Longer Prison Terms Than Women For Same Crimes, Study Says

A new study by Sonja Starr, an assistant law professor at the University of Michigan, found that men are given much higher sentences than women convicted of the same crimes in federal court.The study found that men receive sentences that are 63 percent higher, on average, than their female counterparts.

Firstly there's nothing in the article to suggest she was abused, there was no mention of it at sentencing which probably means it didn't happen. Secondly even if she was that doesn't make it okay to go and do it to others. While it could have been a mitigating factor the offence still warrants a custodial sentence. Thirdly, as I said previously, she committed offences into adulthood


Posted from TSR Mobile

You completely missed my point. 14 year old children don't suddenly decide to commit sexual acts on six year olds unless something has seriously gone wrong.

When that 14 year old eventually clicks over to adulthood at 18, they don't suddenly see the reality of their situation in black and white and then make a conscious decision to continue offending.

This is a really sad case for all concerned. It is about as far from black and white as you can get.

You're actually making excuses for a pedophile...


Posted from TSR Mobile

You completely missed my point. 14 year old children don't suddenly decide to commit sexual acts on six year olds unless something has seriously gone wrong.

When that 14 year old eventually clicks over to adulthood at 18, they don't suddenly see the reality of their situation in black and white and then make a conscious decision to continue offending.

This is a really sad case for all concerned. It is about as far from black and white as you can get.

They know what theyre doing, they should face the consequences. Just because you were abused as a child, doesn't give you the right or an excuse to abuse others.

Not at all. I don't see sad cases like this as black and white. When it involves a 14 year old (regardless of what they did later in life) I question what must have happened to her for her to feel that this sort of behaviour was acceptable.

Children do not become monsters because they feel like it.

So you feel it is right to punish victims? What happens if the boy in this case were to start offending? Irrepressibly your opinion of him would chance on a dime?

And how do you punish someone who doesn't feel they have done anything wrong?

There was nothing in the article to suggest that there was some harrowing event that made them behave like that so you have no reason to suggest that's the case.
Posted from TSR Mobile

So you feel it is right to punish victims? What happens if the boy in this case were to start offending? Irrepressibly your opinion of him would chance on a dime?

And how do you punish someone who doesn't feel they have done anything wrong?

They disgust me idgaf what they went through, they went as far as to hurt another human being, an innocent child, and deserve to be punished for it.

And you are assuming a piece of tabloid journalism from The Sun of all papers would present all the facts. Take it from me, 14-year-old children do not sexually abuse 6-year-olds out of thin air. What we do know is that they were spared jail. People tend not to get-out-of-jail-free for offences like this unless there were mitigating circumstances. Clearly, the Sun Newspaper, wishing to stir a sensational story has decided to omit the mitigating circumstances.

I agree with all of that... except that they were 14 when it started happening. 14! Can you remember what you were like at 14?

Anyway - I have said enough on this matter but I would rather defer to the judge who knows the full facts of the case, rather than judge it based on an article by the Sun that has deliberately gone out of its way to provoke the sort of response you have given.