Join TSR now to have your say on this topicSign up now

B1059 – Quota Discrimination Bill 2016 (Second Reading)

    Online

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Saoirse:3)
    In which case if I wanted to use a quota for whatever reason I'd just say it was "economicaly effective" and "likely to generate future commercial potential" and leave it at that. Nobody's gonna talk their way into a legal problem.
    Yeah that's fine. That's a better result than passing this Bill, because permitting quotas in all circumstances is a better result than passing this Bill.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheDefiniteArticle)
    Yeah that's fine. That's a better result than passing this Bill, because permitting quotas in all circumstances is a better result than passing this Bill.
    Indeed, it just seems superfluous.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Nay still - no medical exemptions and the media one does not include a gender exemption.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Still a nay
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    This Bill is in cessation
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    This bill has been withdrawn.
 
 
 
Updated: October 8, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Poll
Do you have exam superstitions?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.