Turn on thread page Beta

Possible Assassination attempt on Trump watch

    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joecphillips)
    And both have evidence showing them to be true, just because you label something a conspiracy theory doesn't prove it wrong.
    Neither do.
    A blog written by a Trump supporter is not 'evidence'.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bornblue)
    Neither do.
    A blog written by a Trump supporter is not 'evidence'.
    I don't think video recordings of conversations with groups working with the dnc class as a blog by a trump supporter.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joecphillips)
    I don't think video recordings of conversations with groups working with the dnc class as a blog by a trump supporter.
    Evidence?

    I know you struggle to distinguish between facts and lies.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bornblue)
    Evidence?

    I know you struggle to distinguish between facts and lies.
    https://youtu.be/5IuJGHuIkzY

    There is the video
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joecphillips)
    https://youtu.be/5IuJGHuIkzY

    There is the video
    You do realise Project Veritas are a Trump supporting group?

    There is no evidence that Clinton or Obama paid people to disrupt and cause violence at Trump rallies.

    We have seen yesterday how Trump supporters react to protesters, by beating them up.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bornblue)
    You do realise Project Veritas are a Trump supporting group?

    There is no evidence that Clinton or Obama paid people to disrupt and cause violence at Trump rallies.

    We have seen yesterday how Trump supporters react to protesters, by beating them up.
    The only evidence is what people high up in the organisations that the dnc have ties with (not even Donna brazile denied the links between them) says that they are paid to incite violence, the evidence points to the dnc and Hillary's campaign and they mentioned they have it so while Hillary knows what's happening she has plausible deniability.

    You attack the source do you agree that what is said isn't acceptable in any context? If it is acceptable explain how?

    Is it not her job to know how campaign is being run? It doesn't seem very presidential to not know.

    Then there is this showing that one of the people in the video was getting paid by the campaign less than 2 weeks before the Chicago 'protests' which she bragged about causing.
    https://beta.fec.gov/data/disburseme...12%2F31%2F2016

    Trump has been called racist because of his company not renting to black people when the only proof he knew was he was president of the company, this is a similar situation.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joecphillips)
    The only evidence is what people high up in the organisations that the dnc have ties with (not even Donna brazile denied the links between them) says that they are paid to incite violence, the evidence points to the dnc and Hillary's campaign and they mentioned they have it so while Hillary knows what's happening she has plausible deniability.

    You attack the source do you agree that what is said isn't acceptable in any context? If it is acceptable explain how?

    Is it not her job to know how campaign is being run? It doesn't seem very presidential to not know.

    Then there is this showing that one of the people in the video was getting paid by the campaign less than 2 weeks before the Chicago 'protests' which she bragged about causing.
    https://beta.fec.gov/data/disburseme...12%2F31%2F2016
    She has paid people to campaign for her. There is no evidence she has paid people to incite violence.

    The video you linked was from a pro-Trump group who received $10,000 from his campaign. They are also known to heavily and selectively edit videos to make their point.

    Protesters at Obama rallies are respected. Protesters at Trump rallies are beaten up and threatened.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Bornblue)
    She has paid people to campaign for her. There is no evidence she has paid people to incite violence.

    The video you linked was from a pro-Trump group who received $10,000 from his campaign. They are also known to heavily and selectively edit videos to make their point.

    Protesters at Obama rallies are respected. Protesters at Trump rallies are beaten up and threatened.
    So are you saying what is said could be acceptable? In what circumstances would that be? I normally say context is king but it seems to me that what was said is not acceptable in any possible interpretation.
    Offline

    21
    (Original post by Bornblue)
    It wasn't a joke.
    To you there is no difference between truth and lies.
 
 
 
The home of Results and Clearing

3,090

people online now

1,567,000

students helped last year
Poll
How are you feeling about GCSE results day?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.