Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta

AQA AS Psychology Paper 2, 23 May 2016 Opinions. UNOFFICIAL MARK SCHEME watch

    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by poppygracexx)
    for the 8 marker i wrote about classical and operant conditioning...anyone else? hope the grade boundaries are low!! :bee2:
    OMG same! I think we might of done it wrong 😁 at least I'm not the only one xx


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tsr1807)
    I thought the biology bits were really hard
    same!! what did u do for multiple choice? and exitatoey and inhinitroy
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Hannzz98)
    OMG same! I think we might of done it wrong 😁 at least I'm not the only one xx


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Aw phew!
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Obiejess)
    Guys no-one else appears to have started one, so if you can remember some Qs do you want to start one here?

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...it?usp=sharing
    There's one in progress here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...yw/mobilebasic
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tsr1807)
    I left out the multiple choice!
    you didnt even guess or wat lmao?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tsr1807)
    Yeah I wrote about classical and operant conditioning too!
    What did people put for the 8 mark cognitive question?
    More specifically the two "features" of the cognitive approach?
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kas9)
    What did people put for the 8 mark cognitive question?
    More specifically the two "features" of the cognitive approach?
    The two features I said were:
    Theoretical models and computer analogies
    The role of schemas

    The two limitations I said were:
    The computer analogies cannot be generalised to humans because we're different in a number of ways.
    The schemas bring about practical application e.g bring implications for eye witness testimonies when eye witnesses fill in the gaps of info, etc

    Obviously I expanded on the points and explained them, wbu?
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kas9)
    What did people put for the 8 mark cognitive question?
    More specifically the two "features" of the cognitive approach?
    For the two features, I wrote about schemas and the computer analogy (How cognitive psychologists see the mind as similar to a computer). No idea if this is right though

    I found this paper quite hard, much harder than the first one.
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kas9)
    What did people put for the 8 mark cognitive question?
    More specifically the two "features" of the cognitive approach?
    Features i used were theoretical models and schema and for limitations i wrote that it's reductionist and computer models cannot apply to humans
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kas9)
    What did people put for the 8 mark cognitive question?
    More specifically the two "features" of the cognitive approach?
    I wrote about schemas and computer models. But I've failed so badly in this exam it went awfully
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    are theoretical models like beck and ellis?
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Frubeo)
    are theoretical models like beck and ellis?
    no its the working memory model and multi store model
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Roughly what would a low C and high A equal out to overall?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by IRoranth)
    The two features I said were:
    Theoretical models and computer analogies
    The role of schemas

    The two limitations I said were:
    The computer analogies cannot be generalised to humans because we're different in a number of ways.
    The schemas bring about practical application e.g bring implications for eye witness testimonies when eye witnesses fill in the gaps of info, etc

    Obviously I expanded on the points and explained them, wbu?
    I just wrote about the internal mental processes and computer model
    I personally found it a little tough
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...h.2qht6dr6xweo
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by hehexd)
    no its the working memory model and multi store model
    do you think i would get marks talking about Beck and Ellis as they are cognitive for depression, also Jahoda.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Laurenloops)
    For the two features, I wrote about schemas and the computer analogy (How cognitive psychologists see the mind as similar to a computer). No idea if this is right though

    I found this paper quite hard, much harder than the first one.
    Yes i totally agree! It was a lot harder for me too! That last 12 marker was horrible too. I knew it'd be an approach explaining a disorder, but didn't expect it to be that one...
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Frubeo)
    are theoretical models like beck and ellis?
    The cognitive models would be Beck and Ellis yeah
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by kas9)
    The cognitive models would be Beck and Ellis yeah
    so would i get marks for using them in 8 marker?
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Frubeo)
    do you think i would get marks talking about Beck and Ellis as they are cognitive for depression, also Jahoda.
    depends what the question was asking, i.e cognitive features in approaches or cognitive features as an explanation of depression.

    if it was the second one then im sure youd get the marks but i cant remember the question fully soz :P
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: May 21, 2017
Poll
Do you agree with the proposed ban on plastic straws and cotton buds?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.