(Original post by cyyuenangie)
i do agree your good statistics skill..you are absoultely right.
but you have fundamentally biased assumption that:
1. student applying to Cambridge, oxford, mit. LBS also apply LSE
2. The student apply to these schools together and got the offer will simply rejected LSE.
If your assumption is correct, the worst school in uk will have the highest instake/application ratio. But i cannot see that.
also, i cannot see anyone here idiot, please stop to use this word to the user here. it is very very low..and i cannot see what qualification you have saying that towards other students here.
Dude, can you read my statement carefully please???? I said the students of Oxford MSc Financial Economics and NOT the applicants, meaning that if those STUDENTS studying at Oxford and actually applied to LSE have already declined LSE...
Did not you say my qualification??? I said conservative estimation, 50%, and 50% is a very very conservative estimation... If every of these schools has 100 students a year, then the 50%,40%, or even 30% can be hundreds!! not to mention those who could not get the funding and delay their entries...
oh dear, stop this argument now... I am tired....