Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

A different view on the girl = ****, boy = legend debate Watch

    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jacktri)
    ohh simpletons you realise it was an analogy right?
    I don't care what it is, if it is used by men or women as an actual argument to justify calling girls sluts then it should be refuted.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Girls can be just as horny as men. Women chase men and think about sex as well. It's just that girls have had throughout history inhibition rammed down their throats.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    Men= key

    Key that opens loads of locks= Master key

    Women= Locks

    Locks opened to loads of keys= ****ty lock
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by CharlieBee_90)
    I don't care what it is, if it is used by men or women as an actual argument to justify calling girls sluts then it should be refuted.
    Bee just take it like a man you lot were defeated....
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    If a lad sleeps with loads of girls - girls would probably think of him as a bit of a man ****/player and maybe stay away from him if they have standards.
    Whereas other lads either just wouldn't care, or his mates would have a bit of a laugh about it with him/ see it as not a bad thing

    If a girl sleeps with loads of lads - Guys would have the same reaction as girls in the first example, they'd think shes a bit of a ****.
    BUT here's the main difference, her fellow girls of the world would also see her as a ****.

    In my eyes this is the reason for the way things are, if a girl does it everyone judges her. If a lad does it, only girls judge and he won't have his mates turning on him.
    Meaning the girl will have a harder time.

    So girls only have themselves to blame
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by i.am.lost)
    You have a valid point. In nature, the female is always the 'choosy' one since her eggs carry a higher value than the males' sperm. Hence, males compete for her and she picks the best one - she shouldn't just have sex with all of them, whereas males are wired differently to maximise the likelihood of them producing an offspring so they will go after as many females as possible.
    Stuff like this is known as the natural fallacy.
    I.e. what is natural is not always best, or right.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mm_Minty)
    Stuff like this is known as the natural fallacy.
    I.e. what is natural is not always best, or right.
    Doesn't mean it doesn't explain the evolutionary and biological reasoning behind abstract behaviour.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    this is a hilarious thread
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    The whole '****' or 'legend' names are basic things from socialisation, like most other things, they are things to keep the different sexes in order. It isn't just about nature and eggs, it's up to the person, if they want to sleep with loads of different people then who are we to stop them and insult them, it is afterall their lives.

    It should be equal to both men and women, as if people just degrade women for sleeping around then isn't that sexist? I find it highly amusing when some guys call girls ****s or whores when they do just the same as them. I think that to make it fair, men should be called ****s, whores, sluts, ect. 'Cause otherwise it's unfair, orginally those words were shot at women, but men can be whores too, it isn't exactly uncommon now, is it? Calling people these brainless terms just A) shows that the person calling them is beyond unoriginal and B) shows that the word is still unequal - let's face it, calling someone a '****' and another a 'player' doesn't really have the same effect now, does it? :P
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RedJimmy)
    Doesn't mean it doesn't explain the evolutionary and biological reasoning behind abstract behaviour.
    Doesn't mean it explains why we should have certain views on said behaviour.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    No one wants to think of the person they like/love being with someone else, because over the last couple of millenia men have been the dominant gender this has led to a societal ingraining of girls to be chaste and to be socially judged for promiscuity. Everyone has temptations and so men have made it acceptable for themselves to sleep around. However I'll never have anything to compare it to but as I guy i can tell you that (especially with a few drinks) we get really horny to the point of wanting to nail girls considerably below what we would consider our "dating standard"; I don't know it girls get this but they give the impression that they don't get it nearly as badly??
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Absinth)
    I'd make a witty remark about how the term "legend" is an abstract concept to 90% of males on TSR because they spend every waking moment ****ing off to UCAS (and Emma Watson).

    But I know my place is in the kitchen. :suith:
    You will go far in life. <3
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    1. An appendage to allow for urination and the ejaculation of sperm is not the same as a device designed to open and close another object. A passageway to allow sperm to reach the ovum and babies to be born is not the same as an instrument intended to prevent access. The key/lock analogy isn't an analogy at all; there's no similarity from which a comparison can be made. I might as well try to make the "analogy" that a crap garage is one that allows only one car (ever) whereas a fantastic garage is one that allows lots and lots of cars, over and over.

    2. If you want to argue that men can be promiscuous because they need to spread their seed then you need to be consistent and demand that men sleep around for procreation, not recreation.

    3. It doesn't matter if male animals might be promiscuous and females not; animals also **** in the forest and bark at trees. We've evolved beyond them. Plus, nature isn't a sensible measure of morality.

    4. Just because it's easy doesn't make it wrong. Plenty of rich, famous, good-looking male rock stars, actors, and athletes can get any number of women they like. Are they being bad? The fact that it's easier for a girl to be promiscuous just makes her lucky, not a slut.

    5. If you find promiscuous women repulsive then that's your issue. Plenty of people are repulsed by homosexuality, pre-marital sex, people with black skin, and atheism. Are their tastes correct? Then what of yours?

    Try to find better excuses for your unjustified objections.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by meatzaper)
    Bee just take it like a man you lot were defeated....
    The post above me would suggest otherwise
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MRushton)
    5. people with black skin
    lool also known as black people...
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by CharlieBee_90)
    The post above me would suggest otherwise
    lool I saw what you wrote before btw.... but had to jump in the shower quickly... in all honesty though (it sounds kind of weird but too late now) girls are the ones getting 'done in' so it not really an accomplishment to have sex with lots of boys because after sex boys just feel normal whereas girl feel different.... just admit that Im right...

    its like saying if a guy has sex with a hot celebrity you would rate them but if a girl had sex with a 'rock star' for example you would think they were slutty....
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by meatzaper)
    lool I saw what you wrote before btw.... but had to jump in the shower quickly... in all honesty though (it sounds kind of weird but too late now) girls are the ones getting 'done in' so it not really an accomplishment to have sex with lots of boys because after sex boys just feel normal whereas girl feel different.... just admit that Im right ....
    Doesn't really relate to my point.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by py0alb)
    This might be true, if it was not for the fact that it is based on a completely false premise. This cliched nonsense that "women have all the power" simply doesn't stand up under any scrutiny once you get past your awkward teenage years. The truth is that girls want sex just as much as guys, and have to work just as hard to get it if they're not willing to settle for a knuckle dragging mouth breather.

    For both girls and guys, if you have low standards, you can easily sleep with lots of people simply by going out and socialising. If you have higher standards, you need to put a bit more work in.
    The "women have all the power" might not be true for average looking women, but for pretty ones it seems awfully real. Female beauty is so revered that it allows its bearers to have and do anything they want. I'm not surprised women spend so much time and money on improving their appearance.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by rich2606)
    Repeating something that has been said many times before :

    "If you have a key that can open many locks, its a great key. If you have a lock that can be open by any key, its a ****ty lock".

    Why do i always see this bull****. So you can think of a vague metaphor for sexual intercourse.... but what have locks got to do with sex? Womens vaginas don't protect from theft.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by dzeh)
    How about if the 'woman' was your sister or mother :eyebrow:
    I second this! I do love women so I give respect to them.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What newspaper do you read/prefer?
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.