Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Kabulkid)
    haha thanks

    cambridge's course is general engineering and imperial is civil engineering, either one would be amazing tbh but still, cambridge is cambridge
    Bet your parents are proud of you, cos i surely am and i dont even know you! hahaha.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by scrotgrot)
    Plot a square -1 by -1 and measure the area.

    Geometry is the key to visualising many non-natural numbers.
    But then if you plot a square with measurements 1 by -1 you get positive one as an area?!


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Numberwang)
    Best, easiest and most respectful explanation so far, thanks I love using the double-negative for comic effect, so it's great you used it for comparison
    No problem, glad to help

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Ours is not to reason why. Ours is but to do and die.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Afghan Warrior)
    Bet your parents are proud of you, cos i surely am and i dont even know you! hahaha.
    awww thank you, yeah i guess they are lol

    they're buzzing cos they wunna find me a wife soon and cos in our culture education is massive they think as soon as they say 'my son went to cambridge/imperial' girls will be queuing haha.

    up until my AS results.. my parents thought im an idiot rofl.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Because that's what it says on my calculator
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Kabulkid)
    awww thank you, yeah i guess they are lol

    they're buzzing cos they wunna find me a wife soon and cos in our culture education is massive they think as soon as they say 'my son went to cambridge/imperial' girls will be queuing haha.

    up until my AS results.. my parents thought im an idiot rofl.
    Haha I bet they're right about that!! I'd queue up too but then I'd reject you, just to be the odd one out :awesome: hahaa

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Because a transformation of -1 is equivalent to a 180 degree rotation on the number line. Applying that twice gives you the same result, which is multiplication by 1. The same can be shown for any kind of transformation.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ChaoticButterfly)
    Ours is not to reason why. Ours is but to do and die.
     (-1)(-1) \neq 500
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lerjj)
     (-1)(-1) \neq 500
    Well done.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by james22)
    Doesn't work, plot a 1*-1 square and measure the area.
    Yikes, can't believe I missed this
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Let's assume it was -1

    then -1*-1=-1

    Dividing by -1 (any number divided by itself =1) gives -1=1 which kind of breaks maths

    This is an intuitive explanation, a more formal one can be shown by comsidering the field axioms
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Arithmeticae)
    Let's assume it was -1

    then -1*-1=-1

    Dividing by -1 (any number divided by itself =1) gives -1=1 which kind of breaks maths

    This is an intuitive explanation, a more formal one can be shown by comsidering the field axioms
    The issue is that this only works to disprove (-1)(-1)=(-1)
    Maybe it's 3? Or Pi? And we can't test them in the same way, because I'm pretty sure dividing by (-1) requires previously defining multiplication by it, so you're not allowed to do that.

    It's hard to know how much we're working with here. I think we're trying to define any form of multiplication by negatives (including their reciprocals).
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    idk...i end up accepting most of maths without understanding it
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    As I said before, its just a quick intuitive explanation, but if you want to get really picky about it...

    (−a)b+ab=(−a)b+ab


    (−a)b+ab=b(a−a)

    (−a)b+ab=b(0)

    (−a)b+ab=0

    (−a)b=−ab

    (−a)(−b)+(−ab)=(−a)(−b )+(−a)b

    (−a)(−b)+(−ab)=(−a)(b− b)

    (−a)(−b)+(−ab)=(−a)(0)

    (−a)(−b)+(−ab)=0

    (−a)(−b)=ab

    although it should be pretty clear it's not going to be something like 400 :/

    (Original post by lerjj)
    The issue is that this only works to disprove (-1)(-1)=(-1)
    Maybe it's 3? Or Pi? And we can't test them in the same way, because I'm pretty sure dividing by (-1) requires previously defining multiplication by it, so you're not allowed to do that.

    It's hard to know how much we're working with here. I think we're trying to define any form of multiplication by negatives (including their reciprocals)
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Arithmeticae)
    As I said before, its just a quick intuitive explanation, but if you want to get really picky about it...

    (−a)b+ab=(−a)b+ab


    (−a)b+ab=b(a−a)

    (−a)b+ab=b(0)

    (−a)b+ab=0

    (−a)b=−ab

    (−a)(−b)+(−ab)=(−a)(−b )+(−a)b

    (−a)(−b)+(−ab)=(−a)(b− b)

    (−a)(−b)+(−ab)=(−a)(0)

    (−a)(−b)+(−ab)=0

    (−a)(−b)=ab

    although it should be pretty clear it's not going to be something like 400 :/
    I said 500, because chaos butterfly quoted Charge of the Light Brigade. :facepalm:
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    "Mathematics may be defined as the subject in which we never know what we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying is true."- Bertand Russell


    :rolleyes:
    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Didn't this topic get posted around a month back, it became quite a massive thread as far as I remember.

    Couldn't find it, but found this slightly older one if you want to have a look.
    http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show....php?t=1027293
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Afghan Warrior)
    Haha I bet they're right about that!! I'd queue up too but then I'd reject you, just to be the odd one out :awesome: hahaa

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    lol awww... what if you're the only one i like out of them
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Kabulkid)
    lol awww... what if you're the only one i like out of them
    well you'll have to prove that then wouldnt you
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What newspaper do you read/prefer?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.