Tell me Physics facts!Watch

4 years ago
#41
(Original post by safesploit)
Because it was from my general reading
Ok. It's just that there was, like, an entire episode dedicated to this. He lost a lot of sleep, told an anecdote about Einstein, became a waiter and then had a eureka moment when he dropped some plates. Not sure where to find it online, but the episode was called "The Einstein Approximation" iirc.

Physics fact #294761:
Changing electric fields induce changing magnetic fields

but...

changing magnetic fields can induce changing electric fields. So you can create an electromagnetic wave that propagates by continually inducing a new field just a little further on.
1
4 years ago
#42
You can't feel the attractive force of gravity.
4 years ago
#43
Even more interesting is that gravity is not a force (at least classically).

(Original post by Stonebridge)
You can't feel the attractive force of gravity.
0
4 years ago
#44
(Original post by hestermae)
basically time travels slower the faster you travel, if you travel at speed u relative to an observer the the time you measure = t/sqrt(1 - u^2/c^2) I think where t is the time the observer measures I think
so like time is dilated and the closer to the speed of light you travel the more time is dilated
like its not really you're travelling forward in time but like your clock just ticks slower than someone elses clock who you're moving relative to
also like weird stuff happens when you have acceleration and like I think space time bends and stuff but we dont do general relativity till 3rd year so I dont know that much about that
Interesting, thank you
0
4 years ago
#45
(Original post by Stonebridge)
You can't feel the attractive force of gravity.
Surely if you stuck me between two supermassive objects, I'd be able to feel their pull?? Suppose they're even SUPER supermassive and I'm fixed in place, I'd definitely feel them tearing my limbs off.
0
4 years ago
#46
(Original post by Hype en Ecosse)
Surely if you stuck me between two supermassive objects, I'd be able to feel their pull?? Suppose they're even SUPER supermassive and I'm fixed in place, I'd definitely feel them tearing my limbs off.
It's all relative.

Posted from TSR Mobile
1
4 years ago
#47
(Original post by WishingChaff)
Not really true. It is questions like this that have led to huge breakthroughs in the standard model of particle physics (specifically the study of the higgs field). If you wish to read more about it, the wikipedia article on tachyonic fields is rather informative.
We'll put it this way - my tutor at Oxford works at CERN and is pretty much an expert on the standard model and is one of the world's leading particle physicists. His view on tachyonic fields is 'bull****'. They are generally considered a curiosity by experimentalists at the moment.
0
4 years ago
#48
(Original post by RoyalBlue7)
<a rel="nofollow" href="javascript:void(0)"><img src="http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/pictures/55/554ed9cf768b3b97c220a766c367a3b0 .png" width="74" height="17" style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" alt=" E = mc^2 " title=" E = mc^2 " onclick="newWindow=window.open(' http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/latexcode.php?code=+E+%3D+mc%5E2 +','latexCode','toolbar=no,locat ion=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable= yes,status=no,width=460,height=3 20,left=200,top=100');" /></a>
Only when relative speed between frames is less that 0.1c does it approxise to the above. Otherwise would be this.

@OP

This is a pretty good youtube channel with lots of physics videos aimed at ordinary folk.

Here's one

1
4 years ago
#49
(Original post by Hype en Ecosse)
Surely if you stuck me between two supermassive objects, I'd be able to feel their pull?? Suppose they're even SUPER supermassive and I'm fixed in place, I'd definitely feel them tearing my limbs off.
Hm. Surely in that case the forces from the two objects on every atom in your body would balance and you'd feel nothing?
4 years ago
#50
It's not quite as good as Chemistry.
0
4 years ago
#51
(Original post by Stonebridge)
Hm. Surely in that case the forces from the two objects on every atom in your body would balance and you'd feel nothing?
Yeah, the more I try to think of examples, the more I realise you're right! It doesn't matter what I do in that scenario, the only thing I'll feel is the acceleration due to gravity, rather than the force of weight itself.
0
4 years ago
#52
I'm not really sure what to say to this. Your supervisor is very much entitled to his opinion however, I don't believe he would dismiss it in this way, and this is in fact your vanity coming across. Anyway, as an active researcher in theoretical physics I can confidently say that this is not a question that should be instantly dismissed. It has, as I said before, led to huge breakthroughs into many branches of physics, including (experimental) particle physics and the theory of superconductors. Rather than making spurious statements like this, I suggest you speak to your supervisor as you may actually learn something from him.

(Original post by natninja)
We'll put it this way - my tutor at Oxford works at CERN and is pretty much an expert on the standard model and is one of the world's leading particle physicists. His view on tachyonic fields is 'bull****'. They are generally considered a curiosity by experimentalists at the moment.
0
4 years ago
#53
(Original post by Stonebridge)
Hm. Surely in that case the forces from the two objects on every atom in your body would balance and you'd feel nothing?
Surely if they're sufficiently dense then the part of you closest to Mass A is attracted more to A than to B? So you'd get spread out between them because you'd have a continually increasing net force going out from the centre of your body.

(Just to be clear, you still don't 'feel' gravity, unless you're being spaghettified by a black hole. And in that case you're feeling a difference in gravitational field strength across your own body. And you're probably dead.)
0
4 years ago
#54
(Original post by Stonebridge)
Hm. Surely in that case the forces from the two objects on every atom in your body would balance and you'd feel nothing?
In theory yes.... However you have to remember that gravity has a range

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
4 years ago
#55
(Original post by lerjj)
Surely if they're sufficiently dense then the part of you closest to Mass A is attracted more to A than to B? So you'd get spread out between them because you'd have a continually increasing net force going out from the centre of your body.

(Just to be clear, you still don't 'feel' gravity, unless you're being spaghettified by a black hole. And in that case you're feeling a difference in gravitational field strength across your own body. And you're probably dead.)
Better wording than mine, but it's what I tried to say.

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
4 years ago
#56
(Original post by lerjj)
Surely if they're sufficiently dense then the part of you closest to Mass A is attracted more to A than to B? So you'd get spread out between them because you'd have a continually increasing net force going out from the centre of your body.

(Just to be clear, you still don't 'feel' gravity, unless you're being spaghettified by a black hole. And in that case you're feeling a difference in gravitational field strength across your own body. And you're probably dead.)

(Original post by Andy98)
In theory yes.... However you have to remember that gravity has a range

Posted from TSR Mobile
Certainly, if you are in a non uniform field such that there is a difference between your head and feet you would get stretched. My original post was referring to the standard F = GmM/r2 force on an object in a field, which you don't feel. It was meant to stimulate discussion. Seems like it did, too.
4 years ago
#57
The most powerful force in the universe is in your hand.

You are 99.9% empty space.

Other facts:

The Catholic church cannot have mass without the Higgs boson.

42
0
4 years ago
#58
(Original post by jamesgates1)
42
What question does this answer though?

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
4 years ago
#59
(Original post by Hype en Ecosse)
What question does this answer though?

Posted from TSR Mobile
42 is the ultimate answer to life, the universe and everything.

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
4 years ago
#60
(Original post by Andy98)
42 is the ultimate answer to life, the universe and everything.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Someone needs to brush up on their Hitchhiker's!

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
X

new posts
Latest
My Feed

Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

University open days

• Cranfield University
Cranfield Forensic MSc Programme Open Day Postgraduate
Thu, 25 Apr '19
• University of the Arts London
Open day: MA Footwear and MA Fashion Artefact Postgraduate
Thu, 25 Apr '19
• Cardiff Metropolitan University
Sat, 27 Apr '19

Poll

Join the discussion

Have you registered to vote?

Yes! (162)
38.94%
No - but I will (22)
5.29%
No - I don't want to (30)
7.21%
No - I can't vote (<18, not in UK, etc) (202)
48.56%