Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Liberals oppress anyone who opposes their beliefs Watch

    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joecphillips)
    so you support the racist Leslie Jones who openly told her followers to harass someone?

    Attachment 564330
    Did you neglect to include what the person said to her... How convenient
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Little Popcorns)
    Did you neglect to include what the person said to her... How convenient
    You were complaining about someone setting a hate mob on someone apply your standards for everyone.

    She even went on tv and said he she sets her followers on people and got praised for it.

    Do you have anything where milo had said anything like that?
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sisuphos)
    I did not say you should be prevented from making assumptions about a person's character and judging people you know nothing about. I just said it's sad.

    Did I say words won't hurt me? I said they most definitely will but that's no grounds for preventing someone from opening his mouth ever again.
    Not as sad and deplorable as the effects so called 'just words' have on someone who suffers real discrimination because they're part of a marginalised or minority group. That's sad.

    It isn't? So kids for example... We should teach our children that racism and other forms of discrimination are just fine because they're just word, just ignore them. And if there are inevitable insidious effects? Pretend nothing's happening, better yet shove your head in the sand and hope they don't start with the fisty cuffs because then you've got big trouble . . .

    That sound about right?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Little Popcorns)
    Yes he has. What planet are you on.
    Show me one example of this alleged racism.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joecphillips)
    You were complaining about someone setting a hate mob on someone apply your standards for everyone.

    She even went on tv and said he she sets her followers on people and got praised for it.

    Do you have anything where milo had said anything like that?
    She's done that in response to abuse.

    You know in the same way if someone starts to attack you and you defend yourself and you shout your friends for help too. Don't give me, yes exactly this is what Milo has done... I know even you know you'd be kidding yourself if you pulled that one.
    Her profession is not based around being a full time **** and insulting everyone for her own gratification. Milo's is. His full time job is hate.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lawliettt)
    Show me one example of this alleged racism.
    Read up my post starting plz in response to the other guy that said this
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Little Popcorns)
    Did you neglect to include what the person said to her... How convenient
    What exactly would it change? They are both in the wrong. To keep consistency, both leslie and the person replied to would need to be banned like milo.

    (Original post by Little Popcorns)
    Read up my post starting plz in response to the other guy that said this
    No example was given, sorry.

    What his dumb followers decide to do isn't in his control. On the otherhand, there's literally evidence of leslie directly telling her followers to harass someone.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Little Popcorns)
    She's done that in response to abuse.

    You know in the same way if someone starts to attack you and you defend yourself and you shout your friends for help too. Don't give me, yes exactly this is what Milo has done... I know even you know you'd be kidding yourself if you pulled that one.
    Her profession is not based around being a full time **** and insulting everyone for her own gratification. Milo's is. His full time job is hate.
    So calling on 300,000+ people to attack someone is defending yourself, make your mind up is it acceptable to set hate mobs on people or not?

    This films marketing was simply insult anybody who doesn't go to watch it.

    So because someone is a **** you can falsely claim that someone has set a hate mob on someone?
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Little Popcorns)
    Read up my post starting plz in response to the other guy that said this
    What are your thoughts on Leslie Jones openly stating she hates light skinned people?
    Name:  image.jpeg
Views: 58
Size:  55.6 KB

    You are openly on the side of the racist who sets hate mobs on people while accusing someone else of doing it with no proof at all
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Little Popcorns)
    Not as sad and deplorable as the effects so called 'just words' have on someone who suffers real discrimination because they're part of a marginalised or minority group. That's sad.

    It isn't? So kids for example... We should teach our children that racism and other forms of discrimination are just fine because they're just word, just ignore them. And if there are inevitable insidious effects? Pretend nothing's happening, better yet shove your head in the sand and hope they don't start with the fisty cuffs because then you've got big trouble . . .

    That sound about right?
    No one suffers from "real discrimination" in the west anymore.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Little Popcorns)
    Read up my post starting plz in response to the other guy that said this
    I'd also like to add that your analogy was incredibly stupid. Hitler literally ordered his workers and followers to commit his evil deeds. If you think the same applies here then you're a bit baft.

    It was just him having an argument his followers acting stupid on their own accord. Whereas on the other hand, you have countless tweets of Leslie ACTUALLY BEING OFFENSIVE AND RACIST and telling her followers to harass various people

    I mean for gods sake. I didn't even know who leslie jones was until today but look at this:

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/0...itter-history/

    And that's just a few of them.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lawliettt)
    I'd also like to add that your analogy was incredibly stupid. Hitler literally ordered his workers and followers to commit his evil deeds. If you think the same applies here then you're a bit baft.

    It was just him having an argument his followers acting stupid. Whereas on the otherhand, you have countless tweets of Leslie ACTUALLY BEING OFFENSIVE AND RACIST and telling her followers to harass various.

    I mean for gods sake. I didn't even know who leslie jones was until today but look at this:

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/0...itter-history/
    And that's just a few of them.
    Just so you know they will likely dismiss clear evidence because it is a right wing website not buzzfeed
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joecphillips)
    Just so you know they will likely dismiss clear evidence because it is a right wing website not buzzfeed
    tbh if they can look at something that clear and dismiss it then they're not worth debating with in the first place. And notice how that little popcorns person has stopped replying now lol. Using purely their logic, Leslie Jones should be banned ASAP. You can't pick and choose when to enforce a rule.

    What does annoy me is how there's actual racist accounts that post every day with no punishment yet twitter has banned someone who hasn't posted a single racist tweet.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lawliettt)
    tbh if they can look at something that clear and dismiss it then they're not worth debating with in the first place. And notice how that little popcorns person has stopped replying now lol. Using purely their logic, Leslie Jones should be banned ASAP. You can't pick and choose when to enforce a rule.

    What does annoy me is how there's actual racist accounts that post every day with no punishment yet twitter has banned someone who hasn't posted a single racist tweet.
    I know, yes milo is a provocateur but he has not broken the rules Twitter have, I have saw people calling for the death of white people, men and cops and they are still active but criticise a propaganda film and you get banned.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sisuphos)
    Says who? and which neoliberals voted for it?
    Aggressive military action violates the non-aggression principle of Classical Liberalism. George Bush is a capitalist who voted for it, Ron Paul is a capitalist who opposed it.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Little Popcorns)
    why should anyone have to continually do that? They shouldn't. If you're so bothered about freedom of speech and you continue to desire the shutting down of opposing rights you're nothing but and hypocrit. Rights, for everyone except those that impinge on your ability to get vengeance on your embitterment at the world, except those that aren't 'convenient' for you and except those that don't bring any benefits to you personally?
    Enough of the logical fallacies and other such nonsense, you little fascist.

    (Original post by Little Popcorns)
    Why should anyone have to continually do that?
    Because:

    "Cancer offends me therefore getting cancer must be outlawed."
    "The idea that some people like apples offends me therefore liking apples must be outlawed."
    "Preferring green grass offends me because it's wasist towards yellow grass, so preferring green grass must be outlawed."

    Are all rubbish reasons to do anything.

    (Original post by Little Popcorns)
    If you're so bothered about freedom of speech and you continue to desire the shutting down of opposing rights, you're nothing but a hypocrite.
    Free speech is a human right, having your feelings spared is not.

    Also:

    "Peroxidation supports freedom of speech therefore Peroxidation also desires shutting down other human rights" is a non sequitur, a logical fallacy. Supporting freedom of speech and supporting all other human rights (the real ones, not ones that you just made up) aren't mutually exclusive. The funny thing is, since your logical fallacy was based on a false assumption it's like a double whammy. You've not only shot yourself in the foot with that one, but cut the thing clean off.

    (Original post by Little Popcorns)
    Rights, for everyone except those that impinge on your ability to get vengeance on your embitterment at the world, except those that aren't 'convenient' for you and except those that don't bring any benefits to you personally?
    I'm not even going to bother with this bit, I'm getting bored of discussing your fallacies.

    One thing I would say though, is that as a Buddhist, practicing my religion requires me to always speak the truth. In my sect this applies regardless of whether it's offensive/unpleasant or not. So by supporting censorship you're denying me my right to be a Buddhist. Not only was that made illegal by the equality act of 2010, but it also makes you a Buddhaphobe and a 'racist' (by leftist logic race = religion). Your left wing ideology will come back to bite you if you're not careful.

    (Original post by Sisuphos)
    I did not say you should be prevented from making assumptions about a person's character and judging people you know nothing about. I just said it's sad.

    Did I say words won't hurt me? I said they most definitely will but that's no grounds for preventing someone from opening his mouth ever again.
    Hit the nail right on the head.
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Atlas Thugged)
    Aggressive military action violates the non-aggression principle of Classical Liberalism. George Bush is a capitalist who voted for it, Ron Paul is a capitalist who opposed it.
    NAP is not really classically liberal. The classical liberals like Smith, Locke, Hume and later Hayek, Friedman, Mises were not NAPers.

    NAP libertarians are usually anarcho-capitalists like Rothbard and Rand if she knew what she was talking about (which she didn't). Nozick was an exemption.

    Mods: wtf is wrong with the quotation system? I don't receive notifications when someone quotes me.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Would you like to hibernate through the winter months?
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.