Deadly gun attack in Paris: Global reactions & discussion

In NO way am I saying that what the terrorists did is justified

But They did kind of bring this upon themselves. Everyone know how protective muslims are when it comes to prophet Muhammad SAW, and to make a satirical magazine about is obviously going to cause some sort of reaction. Especially as extremist terrorism is rising and is so dominant in the media

however, saying that the terrorists shouldn't have reacted in that way...

Then I can't say much to you. Your views in my opinion are the same in all circumstances

It's funny that, hundreds of years ago, people got away with publishing satirical cartoons against absolute monarchs who were alive at the time, but get brutally massacred for publishing satire against a long-dead man in 2015.

No, because they are calling for someone to be killed for their sexuality.

Freedom of speech does not cover incitement to murder.

Ridiculing a ridiculous religion is not incitement to murder (other than your own, of course).

www.nbcnews.com/storyline/paris-magazine-attack/paris-attack-suspect-dead-two-custody-n281761

1 suspect dead, two in custody. NBC seem to be the only ones reporting this though...

No one but three newspapers published the caricatures:


How brave.

No one but three newspapers published the caricatures:


How brave.

Which ones? I cant see

Ka'b bin al-Ashraf was a poet who criticized and mocked the Islamic prophet, Muhammad, who, in turn, ordered him to be killed.
http://hadithcollection.com/sahihbukhari/78-Sahih%20Bukhari%20Book%2045.%20Mortgaging/3244--shahih-bukhari-volume-003-book-045-hadith-number-687.html

I do not "pick" any interpretation. I merely highlight the fact that there is more than one legitimate, scripturally supported version, depending on which source you use.

It is the insisting that there is only one that is disingenuous and mendacious
It is the insisting that Muhammad never had his critics killed, for example, and that therefore killing a critic of Muhammad is "unIslamic" that is disingenuous and mendacious, not the pointing out that he did.

The youngest one surrendered.

The two other handsome guys here:

How many times did you see him actually get shot?

How do you know that every shot fired hit the target?

given the fact that he was on the floor he definitely got "shot" at least twice.
if he did get shot at all that is

This most certainly isn't a mainstream source, but I agree that many among Muslims "scholars" lead misguided, cruel oppressive cults. Anyone can interpret how he wants, but it's not necessary everyone's interpretation is correct.
I don't think muslims with other point of views should even try to justify such interpretations. And BTW, it is commonly accepted among Muslims to never quote a hadith from the Quran. Upon further investigation, I found this hadith no where else, in books or other (un)reputable websites. The reference number is fake.
You must understand the only reason I am typing all this is to refute you claims against Islam as a whole.
We as Muslims are not answerable for the insane minds of these psuedo mullahs, and I am on the same page as you when it comes to such scums, I dislike them, I disapprove them and I disagree with them.

Guys. That poor policeman in the video was muslim.

Posted from TSR Mobile