The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 680
Original post by madrevision
omg guys do the specimen paper- I swear I thought had done it before because one 1 questions from that pop up in a few papers


good idea xD

is there a markscheme?
Original post by Whostolemycookie
300/100000= 0.0030%
380/100000=0.0038%
The difference between the two is 0.0008
But the ms says 0.008 I don't get it tbh either :frown:



Original post by super121
You divided by 100,000 instead of 10,000


Posted from TSR Mobile



Original post by usycool1
The difference is 80ppm (380 - 300).

Convert 80ppm to a percentage and that's your answer. :smile:


Thank you! I get it, I have no idea why I didn't do that :s-smilie: and only couple more hours left :facepalm:
Original post by CoolRunner
can you oxidise a ketone?


Yes, Secondary alcohols are heated to oxidise a ketone
Original post by Whostolemycookie
Yes, Secondary alcohols are heated to oxidise a ketone


You can't oxidise ketone's further though :smile:
Reply 684
What page is Jan 2013 on guys? Sorry for asking:colondollar:
Original post by abzy1234
You can't oxidise ketone's further though :smile:


Nope, and you can't oxidize tertiary alcohols
Original post by Whostolemycookie
Nope, and you can't oxidize tertiary alcohols


Yup, as they don't have a hydrogen atom on the carbon atom to which the -OH group is attached to :smile:
Sorry, but can anyone explain this to me please?
Reply 688
Original post by Whostolemycookie
Yes, Secondary alcohols are heated to oxidise a ketone


Secondary alcohols are oxidised to ketones but not oxidised from ketones. The Ketone is a product. Then there are not more hydrogens attached to the carbon attached to the OH group so no more oxidation can occur.
Original post by nivvy21
Sorry, but can anyone explain this to me please?


Which one?


Original post by Ali_Ludley
Secondary alcohols are oxidised to ketones but not oxidised from ketones. The Ketone is a product. Then there are not more hydrogens attached to the carbon attached to the OH group so no more oxidation can occur.


Sorry that's what I meant
Original post by Whostolemycookie
Which one?




Posted from TSR Mobile

The circled one, sorry :tongue:
Reply 691
Original post by Whostolemycookie
Which one?




Sorry that's what I meant


I'm sure it is it's just these examiners are so pedantic in marking...
Reply 692
Thank you!!!!!!
Original post by nivvy21
Posted from TSR Mobile

The circled one, sorry :tongue:


It looks like you got it right, what doesn't you understand
Original post by tasniaa
good idea xD

is there a markscheme?
yh :smile:
Reply 695
Is there anyone else who's feeling like they're going to completely mess this up? xD Chemical ideas is okay, but the storylines stuff is a different matter. And the advanced notice...
Reply 696
That's just mark scheme, where's QP??
Reply 697
Reply 698
Original post by cheetahs56
What page is Jan 2013 on guys? Sorry for asking:colondollar:


http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?p=42787726#post42787726
Reply 699
Original post by Ali_Ludley
The propene is right however I'm not sure if you have to specify the double bond here so the proper name might be prop-2-ene and the diagram is correct.
If you look at the diagram it shows 2 but-2-enes and 1 prop-2-ene (in the middle).


Why is it prop-2-ene? It's the same thing as prop-1-ene, isn't it? So just propene?

Latest

Trending

Trending