all porn is homosexual Watch

JW92
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#61
Report 7 years ago
#61
(Original post by humanrights)
DEFINING HOMOSEXUAL AND HETEROSEXUAL


The "establishment" agenda is to destabilize and neuter us by encouraging homosexual behavior. This ensures we don't propagate since homosexuals have sex but don't have children.

They redefine "homosexual" as a "sexual preference" or "lifestyle choice" rather than a developmental disorder so as to entrap us. Never mind that the vast majority of homosexuals come from dysfunctional families or suffered sexual abuse as youths. Our reluctance to embrace homosexuality is considered "bigotry."

In response, let's take liberties with these definitions ourselves. Having the right paradigm is the key to healthy behavior.

Forget about what you normally think of gay or straight (same-sex , opposite sex attraction etc.) Think of heterosexuality as monogamous and dedicated to rearing children; homosexuality as promiscuous and concerned with sex for its own sake.

Heterosexuality involves bonding permanently with a member of the opposite sex for love and usually procreation. It is participating in the natural life cycle, in the intrinsic meaning of life. Personal and societal health depend on heterosexuality.

Homosexuality is a form of arrested development caused by an inability to form a heterosexual bond. As a result, homosexuals compensate using sex as a surrogate for love.

In these terms, society has become more homosexual because, due to social engineering (i.e. the "sexual revolution," feminism) many heterosexuals now fail to permanently bond. Normally, happily married heterosexuals can put sex in perspective and move on to more important things.

A perceptive reader recently wrote me: "If heterosexual sex outside of marriage is acceptable, if we eliminate the procreative aspect from sex, are heterosexuals any different from homosexuals in regards to the sexual activity?"
Do you actually believe this? It's gratuitously insulting.

Edit: (Sort of) read the full article. It's really stupid. You can just redefine words to mean something completely unrelated. If I wanted to take the word fish, I couldn't just decide it meant cactus and form an entire argument around that premise.
0
reply
DorianGrayism
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#62
Report 7 years ago
#62
(Original post by humanrights)
interesting article about the homosexual nature of all porn.


--


...............

ous phenomenon. It was social engineering designed to foster homosexuality and family breakdown. See my "Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution." This is why Spaulding's revelations got so little publicity.





article continued:



http://www.henrymakow.com/001421.html
You really come up with some retarded threads, but this one tops all of them by quite a distance.
0
reply
silverbolt
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#63
Report 7 years ago
#63
that really is a load of bull

though coming from the OP its not exactly a suprise
0
reply
Paul McCartney
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#64
Report 7 years ago
#64
WTF is this I don't even
0
reply
Martyn*
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#65
Report 7 years ago
#65
I agree with Makow on some things but not this. Like others have said; he has redefined the meaning of homosexual so that it fits its theory that all porn is gay.
0
reply
yellowmeringue
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#66
Report 7 years ago
#66
(Original post by magnum.opus)
What do you mean by "someone likes vanilla"? I didn't neg. you, I'm just curious

+rep, though, since I agree- homosexual porn is the best :perv:
Vanilla is the conventional, straight sex with no kinky bits. (Read: a bit dull)
0
reply
HARRY PUTAH
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#67
Report 7 years ago
#67
Nothing wrong with a long schlong ruining the act of fornification for a few minutes.
0
reply
magnum.opus
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#68
Report 7 years ago
#68
(Original post by yellowmeringue)
Vanilla is the conventional, straight sex with no kinky bits. (Read: a bit dull)
Dull is right :sadnod:
0
reply
Tommo3
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#69
Report 7 years ago
#69
Well, if that's what he wanted...
0
reply
Peterpop
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#70
Report 7 years ago
#70
most porn is homosexual, but those that include a male and female, have the contingncy to be hetrosexual, for example a male perso n watching pornography that includes both genders could be considerde to be homosexual, but thatwould constitute that he is taking plesure off the male chaacter in this pornography, but a male watching pornography that involves only female characters would mean that he is only taking plesure off the female making this observation hetrosexual, the actual porn that involved male and female would be considered to be hetroseual , it would be the male watching that would be considered to have homosexual tendancies.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Have you registered to vote?

Yes! (315)
37.77%
No - but I will (64)
7.67%
No - I don't want to (62)
7.43%
No - I can't vote (<18, not in UK, etc) (393)
47.12%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed