(Original post by Studentus-anonymous)
Unfortunately a lot of people, and especially those in charge seem to think state ownership of something equates to communism rather than common sense.
But it seems that as time goes by governments and the state are less interested in providing their half of the social contract and simply raking money in from ever increasing tax burdens.
You sound fairly confident in your assertion that State ownership - what we call seizure in real life - amounts to "common sense". As you are in your belief that government is obliged to adhere to a social contract (which doesn't exist). How do you justify these claims?