Turn on thread page Beta

What is your thinking towards gay people??? watch

Announcements
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    I love gay people!! Bullying is always disgusting, doesn't matter who the person is or why they're being bullied
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I don't mind what they do in their own time, they have rights like everyone else... what I do dislike is some of the 'culture' that SEEMS to go along with it for SOME homosexual people. I hate it when anyone ostentatiously tries to force their views in other people's faces - homosexuality, religion, race... it's been said many times, the world would be better if everyone forgot about these as 'issues' - they're characteristics. I know they are issues but if everyone in society calmed down a bit that'd be great... :P So anyway, no issue with them doing their thing, just don't try to shove it in my face - if I ran around blaming anything that didn't go my way on the fact I was straight I'd get weird looks...
    Plus, the gay community does kinda have a reputation for promiscuity... although again, this is a reputation so I wouldn't automatically judge people by it, it's just another consideration.
    Just to clarify AGAIN this does not apply to all homo people, just a small number...
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    I would help the person fight back the bully, and then teach the victim how to not be a little ***** and how to fight back. Am not superhero just trying to get *****es to think for themselves.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Serpentine111)
    "Merely bid them farewell when they die, as they'll have left nothing behind."
    Isn't that true for everybody? Why single "them" (homosexuals) out then I can now assume you don't believe in Heaven/Hell etc?


    Perhaps marriage isn't the right word, but I believe at least civil partnerships should be allowed anywhere and everywhere - a gay couple should be able to have the same financial/legal securities a straight couple has. Maybe finally we agree on a point: if the church or other religious establishment disapproves of same-sex marriage then it would be wrong to force them to conduct it.


    Nor is it detrimental. Over-population is a major issue anyway, so perhaps homosexuality is a good thing. Please explain how you think it is detrimental. What do you mean by "our people" anyway?
    True for everybody who don't have children. As soon as you die without a kin, your legacy ends. You have failed at the game we call Nature. It doesn't matter what you did in your life or that others are around to enjoy your inventions, but if your children aren't around to enjoy them, it was a futile life. I wouldn't apply this if such men were involved in the lives of the children within their close family.

    Like I said before, civil partnerships, cohabitation and fixing wills to include such people are already legal and have been around since forever. Not even civil partnerships are needed; just fix the will and your legal issues are done away with.

    The overpopulation argument is stupid, quite frankly. Who is overpopulating the planet? Is it White Europeans? Is it the White British? Or is it the Indians, Chinese and Africans? If the UK is overpopulated, why do we still have a mass immigration policy? Think it through.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Nothing wrong with gays. Many stereotyped gays as men who dress as women with heels. Actually, many gays out there are actually the manliest person i have met. Just because a small minority of gays act ridiculous and crazy doesnt mean the public should think that all gays behave that way.

    They have a different sexual orientation than us. So what? Let them be. Going against them is like saying other people shouldnt eat candy because YOU dont like it. I would stand up for gays if they are bullied. I would stand up for ANYONE whos bullied. Period. Ignore the race, interests, gender, sexual orientation.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TorpidPhil)
    And so is hetero sex for non-procreational purposes right? Hope you never use contraception!

    Nothing wrong with hedonism though.
    And I don't condone the binge/one-night stand culture we've seen increasing in the youth of today. Why would you, when it's so detrimental to society? Hetero sex for non-procreation when it's within a relationship is fine; at some point it is likely to lead to babby. No babby can be formed from homosex. No babby is no bueno.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by HigherMinion)
    And I don't condone the binge/one-night stand culture we've seen increasing in the youth of today. Why would you, when it's so detrimental to society? Hetero sex for non-procreation when it's within a relationship is fine; at some point it is likely to lead to babby. No babby can be formed from homosex. No babby is no bueno.
    So interactions between humans that don't eventually lead to a baby are impermissible or...? Because homosexual sex obviously doesn't have to be promiscuous.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TorpidPhil)
    So interactions between humans that don't eventually lead to a baby are impermissible or...? Because homosexual sex obviously doesn't have to be promiscuous.
    Read all my posts in this thread, Phil. I didn't condemn homosexuals, just it's encouragement and promotion through the church/wider society and marriage of homosex couples.

    I don't care what homosexuals do behind closed doors.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by HigherMinion)
    As you spent the time to pen a nice story, Iggy, I shall. Firstly, it's not a 'ridiculous opinion' simply for not believing the two sexualities are equal. One can produce children, a family and raise those children in a safe and balanced environment. I don't have a problem with homosexuals to the point where I'd like to see it legislated against and have homosexuals locked up; that's an extreme abuse of law and proving such things are difficult anyway, since the couple have to be caught in the act for sufficient evidence (imo).

    The problem with the movement is that all of these sexual minorities and special interest groups wish to have all the same cultural rights as heterosexuals without seemingly understanding why it is so engrained in our culture that a man and a woman complete each other. It's like yin and yang. When you tell a socialist that you don't believe gay marriage should have ever existed, they will call you a bigot or homophobe. In actual fact, all gay marriage has done is weakened the church, weakened the institution of marriage and the idea of commitment has been completely lost on most people because of that loss of power.

    There has been homosexual people since Greek and Roman times, and no one cared. It was pushed into privacy, and they were happy to not make a fuss that it was criminal behaviour. It's only when the social justice mob wanted to use sexuality as a frontier for their powerstruggle hegemony wars that homosexuals, bisexuals, asexuals(?!?!) got involved, and this gender=/=sex split occurred. Morally, I still think it's wrong, but I won't condemn those who practice it. Merely bid them farewell when they die, as they'll have left nothing behind. However, it should never be pushed as a "minority group", like race is. Sexuality is personal preference, which means it's unquantifiable; unmeasurable by empirical standards. Things like DNA, race and other data which can quantify what a racial minority is cannot be translated to women or sexuality, as the Marxists would like.

    What would I do if I saw someone being bullied? If I didn't know them? I wouldn't intervene in anyone's battles, regardless of what it's over. I'm not getting my own head kicked in over a playground scuffle.

    In fact, I'll end on that note: the sexual revolution and especially LGBT movement is Cultural Marxism.
    Very interesting, thanks for your input.

    I do think that the concept of marriage has kind of killed itself, with or without the legalisation of gay marriage. You only have to look at how many of our generation's parents are divorced, and that was long before gay marriage was a hot topic.

    What is your attitude to population control? The human race is starting to overpopulate and the possible consequences of this involve suffering. Therefore, shouldn't we be accepting all homosexual acts and possibly even promoting them?

    Also, out of pure interest, what is it that you don't like about Cultural Marxism?
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by HigherMinion)
    Read all my posts in this thread, Phil. I didn't condemn homosexuals, just it's encouragement and promotion through the church/wider society and marriage of homosex couples.

    I don't care what homosexuals do behind closed doors.
    That's the same thing.

    If you truly didn't care about what homosexuals do in private with regards to sex then why would you care about the marriage of homo-couples of their integration into churches and religion?

    If this is about PDA or promiscuity then it has nothing to do with homosexuals and is a problem that faces homos and heteros alike and so you should deeply consider editing your original post on this thread as it gives an entirely different impression.
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by HigherMinion)
    True for everybody who don't have children. As soon as you die without a kin, your legacy ends. You have failed at the game we call Nature. It doesn't matter what you did in your life or that others are around to enjoy your inventions, but if your children aren't around to enjoy them, it was a futile life. I wouldn't apply this if such men were involved in the lives of the children within their close family.

    Like I said before, civil partnerships, cohabitation and fixing wills to include such people are already legal and have been around since forever. Not even civil partnerships are needed; just fix the will and your legal issues are done away with.

    The overpopulation argument is stupid, quite frankly. Who is overpopulating the planet? Is it White Europeans? Is it the White British? Or is it the Indians, Chinese and Africans? If the UK is overpopulated, why do we still have a mass immigration policy? Think it through.
    Basically you are saying life is meaningless without having children? That's probably the stupidest thing I've ever read on TSR and that says a lot. If the fact that homosexuals can't produce offspring is part of the reason you want to suppress them then I give up on this debate, you're hopeless.

    It's an option yes, but part of having a civil partnership/marriage is to show how committed you are to your other half, marriage isn't a necessity either but many people still get married.

    It's not stupid. It's a fact that humans aren't using available resources in a sustainable manner, and with ever increasing population the demand is soon going to outrun the supply. The whole world is overpopulated and all immigration does is move a population from one place to another, whilst having sex and making babies produce more people - is that simple enough to understand?

    Unless you want a one-child policy or something like that in the near future, I'd say homosexuality is a good thing that keeps the population under control.

    You've still not answered why you think that homosexuality is detrimental to "our people"?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by IHTWFR)
    Fxck heterosexuals, they should all be burned at the stake! Whose with me?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Gd 1
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by shyaamb)
    Gd 1
    But wait I'm not a heterophobe, but I think those unnatural "heteros", or however you spell that disgusting word, should be deprived of marital rights, and every other rudimentary human right.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    I think they should be left alone but i will never agree with their lifestyle.
    Will never have a friend or family member who is like that either
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by NathanAllen)
    What or your thoughts towards gay people??? What do you think about when you hear about a homosexual person getting bullied or something... Really what is the first thing that pops into your head???
    Posted from TSR Mobile
    they are unique humin beings. brave, amazing, and the list goes on.

    p.s i'm straight but so what . lol
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    MY THINKING IS THIS ALL OVER
    Attached Images
     
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by empty boxes)
    MY THINKING IS THIS ALL OVER
    Amen. #preach #lord
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Serpentine111)

    It's not stupid. It's a fact that humans aren't using available resources in a sustainable manner, and with ever increasing population the demand is soon going to outrun the supply. The whole world is overpopulated and all immigration does is move a population from one place to another, whilst having sex and making babies produce more people - is that simple enough to understand?

    Unless you want a one-child policy or something like that in the near future, I'd say homosexuality is a good thing that keeps the population under control.

    You've still not answered why you think that homosexuality is detrimental to "our people"?
    One child policy? Much the opposite. We are a dying race, much like the Japanese. The overpopulation of the world doesn't care about the population of the British isles; we are insignificant in comparison to India, China and Africa. I can't put it plainer to you: if you are concerned about population levels at home, then you wouldn't advocate for immigration. If you were concerned about populations in the whole world then you would stop sending aid to foreign countries. Do you want your people to die out?

    Every report states from the ONS that African-born women have 3x as many children in the UK as a UK-born woman. The statistics don't go further than that, unfortunately- those UK born women probably include the children of the African-born.

    (Original post by Iggy Azalea)
    Very interesting, thanks for your input.

    What is your attitude to population control? The human race is starting to overpopulate and the possible consequences of this involve suffering. Therefore, shouldn't we be accepting all homosexual acts and possibly even promoting them?

    Also, out of pure interest, what is it that you don't like about Cultural Marxism?
    See above for my opinion on population control. It depends whether you're talking domestic or global. There are those who wish to see their own people genocided slowly, who are known as ethnomasochists, while those who wish to preserve their people and not completely die out are deemed racists.

    There are many reasons not to like Cultural Marxism, but the applicable reason in this context is the deconstruction and critique of Western tradition, to the detriment of society. It's a parasitic ideology that produces nothing but division among the population.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    What's your attitude to blacks? What's your attitude towards Jews? What's your attitude towards Asians?

    These are not acceptable inquiries. My attitude towards gay people is the attitude I have towards people. There is no distinction.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Don't really care. Same as anyone to be fair, although I'd prefer it if gay men could still act masculine instead of trying to act female. Just because you're homosexual doesn't mean you've lost all masculinity.
 
 
 
Poll
Brexit: Given the chance now, would you vote leave or remain?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.