s.f of enlargement is the square root of the determinant.(Original post by Mm68)
I know this might be more fp1 but I've seen it come up in fp4, how are you supposed to work out the enlargement of a transformation matrix, for example if it's
2 2
2 2
It would be a enlargement 2rt2 but how do you work that out.
x
Turn on thread page Beta
You are Here:
Home
> Forums
>< Study Help
>< Maths, science and technology academic help
>< Maths
>< Maths Exams

AQA FP4 25th May 2016 Discussion Thread watch

 Follow
 61
 23052016 22:56

student0042
 Follow
 2 followers
 2 badges
 Send a private message to student0042
Offline2ReputationRep: Follow
 62
 24052016 00:57
(Original post by EwanatTSR)
Does anyone know an easy method for finding eigenvalues in a 3x3 matrix? I use the Gaussian Elimination process but it is very confusing and a huge space for error. 
Ano9901whichone
 Follow
 2 followers
 9 badges
 Send a private message to Ano9901whichone
Offline9ReputationRep: Follow
 63
 24052016 01:01
(Original post by milsy.afrochic)
anyone else getting slightly concerned about how few resources there are for FP4?? I mean the AQA textbook is just awful
I didn't see that the great man himself already suggested this website.Last edited by Ano9901whichone; 24052016 at 01:02. 
 Follow
 64
 24052016 01:09
(Original post by AHRocks187)
How would you guys go about finding the shortest distance between a point and a plane, assuming you only know the point coordinates and the parametric equation of the plane? Just trying to brush up on geometry techniques as expecting a hard question on this this year
Then solving for the scalar the shortest distance is . 
 Follow
 65
 24052016 01:35
Here's a question for you lot to try, it's about images of lines under matrix transformations.
The transformation, , is defined below as the following
.
The image of the line under is .
It is given that the equation of is
.
(a) Find the equation of the line .
(b) Find the image of the line under which has equation
.Last edited by B_9710; 24052016 at 02:03. 
Argylesocksrox
 Follow
 0 followers
 5 badges
 Send a private message to Argylesocksrox
Offline5ReputationRep: Follow
 66
 24052016 02:47
(Original post by B_9710)
Here's a question for you lot to try, it's about images of lines under matrix transformations.
The transformation, , is defined below as the following
.
The image of the line under is .
It is given that the equation of is
.
(a) Find the equation of the line .
(b) Find the image of the line under which has equation
.
and B. 188x^2216xy+62y^2=3
Is that correct? 
 Follow
 67
 24052016 02:56
(Original post by Argylesocksrox)
A. 9x^2+y^2+6xy+36x+10y=10
and B. 188x^2216xy+62y^2=3
Is that correct? 
 Follow
 68
 24052016 11:01
I'm really struggling with knowing what I have to do at each question as if someone just told me what I have to do I'm normally alright! i suppose that just takes lots of practice of papers but I kind of left that too late :/ At least I'm helping lowering the grade boundaries for you all!
The one thing I really can't seem to do is invariant lines as the way my teacher taught us I've never been able to use in an exam... 
 Follow
 69
 24052016 11:03
(Original post by katie4202)
I'm really struggling with knowing what I have to do at each question as if someone just told me what I have to do I'm normally alright! i suppose that just takes lots of practice of papers but I kind of left that too late :/ At least I'm helping lowering the grade boundaries for you all!
The one thing I really can't seem to do is invariant lines as the way my teacher taught us I've never been able to use in an exam... 
 Follow
 70
 24052016 11:07
(Original post by B_9710)
How have you been taught to find he invariant lines?
To times the matrix by x and then mx+c and the equals the new x and y which is then used in the equation y=mx+c..
I'm not sure that makes sense... 
 Follow
 71
 24052016 11:15
(Original post by katie4202)
To times the matrix by x and then mx+c and the equals the new x and y which is then used in the equation y=mx+c..
I'm not sure that makes sense...
?
This way works. 
student0042
 Follow
 2 followers
 2 badges
 Send a private message to student0042
Offline2ReputationRep: Follow
 72
 24052016 11:28

 Follow
 73
 24052016 11:48
(Original post by student0042)
We do almost the same thing, but let the last matrix be x' and y' and then say we require y' = mx' + c. Subbing in the values from multiplying out the left makes it all work out. 
 Follow
 74
 24052016 13:10
Hey guys, does anyone know why for part C, you get an invariant line and an invariant plane?
I understand that that there is a line of invariants points for lambda =1 (Mx=1x). However I am just not getting the plane part for the other 2 repeated eigenvaluesLast edited by 01binary; 24052016 at 13:12. 
 Follow
 75
 24052016 13:45
(Original post by 01binary)
Hey guys, does anyone know why for part C, you get an invariant line and an invariant plane?
I understand that that there is a line of invariants points for lambda =1 (Mx=1x). However I am just not getting the plane part for the other 2 repeated eigenvalues
Well there is not one answer to these 3 identical equations there are infinitely many answers (and I don't mean answers that are just multiples of each other). So from this you can actually find 2 eigenvectors that are not multiples of each other (they are linearly independent) and so if these eigenvectors are denoted and we can say that there are an invariant plane (if eigenvalues does not equal one) and we can give this equation of plane by . 
 Follow
 76
 24052016 14:04
(Original post by B_9710)
When you are trying to find the eigenvectors do you find that you form 3 identical equations?
Well there is not one answer to these 3 identical equations there are infinitely many answers (and I don't mean answers that are just multiples of each other). So from this you can actually find 2 eigenvectors that are not multiples of each other (they are linearly independent) and so if these eigenvectors are denoted and we can say that there are an invariant plane (if eigenvalues does not equal one) and we can give this equation of plane by .
Well for part b) I found that the eigenvector for lamda =4 as (1 1 2) (x y z) respectively. The equation I got 3 times was x+yz=0
Why would I need to split the vector (1, 1, 2) this is the part I am having trouble with.
Also is this in the AQA FP4 book anywhere 
 Follow
 77
 24052016 14:14
(Original post by 01binary)
Are those equations always identical, I find that sometimes they aren't e.g. for lambda =1?
Well for part b) I found that the eigenvector for lamda =4 as (1 1 2) (x y z) respectively. The equation I got 3 times was x+yz=0
Why would I need to split the vector (1, 1, 2) this is the part I am having trouble with.
Also is this in the AQA FP4 book anywhere
For the bit you're having trouble with literally just find 2 sets of numbers that work. For x+yz=0 I quickly find that (1,1,0) and (2,1,3) work, but you could have (1,1,2) or (3,1,4) so I would have an invariant plane . But if you look carefully you will see that you can make any one of the solutions I gave above from linear combinations of the 2 vectors I gave for the plane. (Using i,j,k notation as it's quicker to do on here).
It's not explicitly stated in the FP4 book but there is an example where they from 3 identical equations and it does say that there is an invariant plane but does not explain why.Last edited by B_9710; 24052016 at 14:18. 
 Follow
 78
 24052016 14:32
(Original post by B_9710)
They aren't always identical. When there are 3 identical equations formed, that is the case when there is an invariant plane (or plane of invariant points if lambda =1).
For the bit you're having trouble with literally just find 2 sets of numbers that work. For x+yz=0 I quickly find that (1,1,0) and (2,1,3) work, but you could have (1,1,2) or (3,1,4) so I would have an invariant plane . But if you look carefully you will see that you can make any one of the solutions I gave above from linear combinations of the 2 vectors I gave for the plane. (Using i,j,k notation as it's quicker to do on here).
It's not explicitly stated in the FP4 book but there is an example where they from 3 identical equations and it does say that there is an invariant plane but does not explain why. 
 Follow
 79
 24052016 14:41
(Original post by 01binary)
Okay I think I am getting it now. So as there is a repeated eigenvalue, and that the equations you get have infinitely many solutions, you could many different eigenvectors for the same eigenvalue. But we only want 2 as eigenvalues each have a paired eigenvector. And what you're saying is that say e.g. (1, 1, 2) can be split into 2 separate direction vectors, which also satisfy the original eq. (x+yz=0) so if we can split into 2 diff vectors this must is a plane as this is pretty much the definition of a plane (with the origin as the start point)? 
 Follow
 80
 24052016 15:31
5D Jan 2011...
I don't fully get why the line where 2 planes intersect is perpendicular to both planes
HELP
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Related discussions:
 AQA Physics PHYA4  Thursday 11th June 2015 [Exam ...
 The Current Year 12 thread 20162017
 The Official Cambridge Applicants Thread 2016 Entry MK II
 The Official Cambridge Offer Holders Thread 2016 Entry MK II
 Official Cambridge Applicants Thread 2016 Entry
 STEP Prep Thread 2016
 Official AS & A2 Results Day 2016
 LSE 2016 Applicants
 The "Are my grades good enough for Maths..." Thread
 Current Year 12 Thread Mark I (2014/15)
TSR Support Team
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
This forum is supported by:
 SherlockHolmes
 Notnek
 charco
 Mr M
 TSR Moderator
 Nirgilis
 usycool1
 Changing Skies
 James A
 rayquaza17
 RDKGames
 randdom
 davros
 Gingerbread101
 Kvothe the Arcane
 TeeEff
 The Empire Odyssey
 Protostar
 TheConfusedMedic
 nisha.sri
 Reality Check
 claireestelle
 Doonesbury
 furryface12
 Amefish
 harryleavey
 Lemur14
 brainzistheword
 Rexar
 Sonechka
 LeCroissant
 EstelOfTheEyrie
 CoffeeAndPolitics
 an_atheist
 Labrador99
 EmilySarah00
Updated: May 26, 2016
Share this discussion:
Tweet