Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

one law you would introduce if u were President/Prime Minister Watch

    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sleepysnooze)
    :' you think there are social costs to LSD?! you have no clue about any of this, do you?
    wtf r u dumb
    (Original post by sleepysnooze)
    also, prohibition in general doesn't work, sherlock
    You're the idiot who asked "why not ban alcohol"
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by drogon)
    wtf r u dumb
    I'm somebody who knows a lot about LSD, actually. you *clearly* haven't the first clue about it.

    You're the idiot who asked "why not ban alcohol"
    yes because you're wanting a policy that doesn't work - why not apply that policy that doesn't work to *everything*? I'm just asking for some consistency! you said prohibition doesn't work - then why are you saying we should prohibit coke? do you think prohibition didn't work because it was specifically alcohol that was banned? :' ) nah.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Re-legalise the ownership of guns.
    Daily reminder that PEOPLE kill, not guns. Serbia and Switzerland have gun ownership legalised and they're doing just fine : )
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sleepysnooze)
    I'm somebody who knows a lot about LSD, actually. you *clearly* haven't the first clue about it.
    1 cost is the cost on the nhs to treat people. another cost is the less productivity as people get ill/ benefits claiming.

    Want me to go on? Oh look, an "expert"

    Consistency? Coke is banned rn. alcohol isnt. Thats consistency. The scientists split it into class A, class B etc etc and alcohol isnt part of that.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BirdIsWord)
    Re-legalise the ownership of guns.
    Daily reminder that PEOPLE kill, not guns. Serbia and Switzerland have gun ownership legalised and they're doing just fine : )
    Equally though they get no benefit from those guns, so what would be the point?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by drogon)
    1 cost is the cost on the nhs to treat people. another cost is the less productivity as people get ill/ benefits claiming.
    mate, to overdose from LSD you would have to *snort* ****ing *grams* of it, and a typical dose is about 100 *micro* grams (give or take), on your tongue via a blotter. LSD isn't dangerous. it can be uncomfortable if you take too much, but you wouldn't be able to do anything if you took too much (i.e. if you're suggesting harming other people). it would sedate you quite a lot and would make you *very* willing to sit down and relax. that's distinct from alcohol where you might become aggressive.

    there's only been about 1 case of an overdose from LSD, and the person/persons recovered rather quickly

    Consistency? Coke is banned rn. alcohol isnt. Thats consistency. The scientists split it into class A, class B etc etc and alcohol isnt part of that.
    coke and alcohol are both drugs you muppet - that's the consistency I was talking about - why ban one and not the other? if anything alcohol is worse for you than coke.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Dheorl)
    Equally though they get no benefit from those guns, so what would be the point?
    Protection from the threat of a tyrannical state #DontTreadOnMe
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BirdIsWord)
    Re-legalise the ownership of guns.
    Daily reminder that PEOPLE kill, not guns. Serbia and Switzerland have gun ownership legalised and they're doing just fine : )
    Shhhh, guns have a mind of their own remember the person who does it doesn't matter only the tool
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BirdIsWord)
    Protection from the threat of a tyrannical state #DontTreadOnMe
    AHhhhhhahahahahaha... AAAAaaahahahaaaahahhahahhaha!!!! !11!!!1!

    Hang on, you're not serious are you?
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by Dheorl)
    Nooooo, not vegetables. They're my kryptonite.

    Also I feel the need to point out my post has more reps than yours
    found that weakness hurrah
    Spoiler:
    Show
    You feel the need to point out that people like me less and therefore I'm less popular :emo:
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Abolish private schools and bring back the polytechnics and other specalist schools for those willing to work with practical tradecraft.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Dheorl)
    AHhhhhhahahahahaha... AAAAaaahahahaaaahahhahahhaha!!!! !11!!!1!

    Hang on, you're not serious are you?
    Yeah I am son
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BirdIsWord)
    Yeah I am son


    Ok, I've got to ask, what good will guns do you?
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Dheorl)


    Ok, I've got to ask, what good will guns do you?
    Freedom from tyranny of the state
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Mine would be a law that would allow me to have as many laws as i want because i can't come up with one right now. I had chemistry today and i used up all my energy on that:p:U
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Danny the Geezer)
    Less brown people. :pierre:
    How abhorrent.

    Spoiler:
    Show

    It's fewer
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BirdIsWord)
    Freedom from tyranny of the state
    And how will they accomplish that?
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    I wouldn't introduce a law as the power of the executive should be to suggest a law and let a senate or parliament debate it.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Following John Locke, I would introduce a law saying, that those for whom toleration is not their own rule, will be punished by fine, prison, capital punishment and/or deportation, depending on crime against toleration they commited and where they come from.

    Any true statement (based on facts, substantive, proven), would not be treated as lack of tolerance, no matter how much the desribed person or group would feel it to be insulting.

    This would solve problems of fundamental extremism, racism and censorship of political correctness in the same time. Of course, only when introduced utterly and with police having the undivided control over every single street in the country, as they used to have in the past.


    (Original post by Dheorl)
    And how will they accomplish that?

    Firearms would allow to overthrow the state and introduce an anarchy, which must cause some gangs and mafias to take power over, so this would free people from tyranny of the state, and and introduce a tyrranny of gangs.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    This will be controversial, but I'd love to ban chewing gum - I really hate seeing it stuck to things, under chairs, all over pavements, and it's not nice seeing someone chewing gum either, especially while they are talking, or if they play with it and stretch it in their hands - eww :yucky:
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Has a teacher ever helped you cheat?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Write a reply...
    Reply
    Hide
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.