The Student Room Group

Muslim family kicked off plane in London after passenger complains

Scroll to see replies

Reply 60
Original post by Zamestaneh
Islamaphobia is on the rise, people becoming more ignorant and right wing, prejudice and profiling increasing, anti-Muslim programs e.g. Prevent are being introduced...

Won't be long until Muslims will be forced to wear bright yellow cresent moons stitched into their clothes by the looks of it...


I have no problem with any of that
Reply 61
Original post by Dez
It's sad when people allow themselves to be ruled by irrational fear.
What, like the fear of offending a god by not covering your hair? Very much so.
Reply 62
Original post by Dodgypirate
It's unfortunate that in this case the accuser was totally wrong, but we can't call them "evil" or "Islamophobic".

This could easily turn into another Rotherham...
Exactly. It is better to be wrong 1000 times than to be right once but not report it for fear of being wrong.
Reply 63
Original post by Dodgypirate
So you're telling me that if the West had not "interfered" with the M.East, it would be paradise on Earth? :lol:
Duh. Everyone knows that the history of Islam and the Middle East was all peace and kittens until The West was invented.
Reply 64
Original post by Zamestaneh
So is racially profiling black people and calling the police because I see a black person standing on a street corner doing nothing okay?
Profiling is a legitimate tool. Security cannot vet everyone, so they concentrate on those who fit the makeup of perpetrators of previous incidents of the type at issue.

Profiling black people would be appropriate if security was on high alert over imminent terrorist attack by an African-American violent terrorist organisation, for example.

Obviously, it will lead to innocent people being approached, but hey, big deal. I've been stopped and questioned when I hadn't done anything wrong. It was inconvenient but it didn't kill me, or even make me angry. Some people just need to suck it up and move on.
Original post by alevelstresss
Islamophobia covers fear of Muslims or Islam

a fear of Muslims is completely unjustified and discriminatory, a fear of Islam is somewhat acceptable but stupid anyway - most people who actually fear Islam haven't even been to high percentage (ie 95%+) communities in remote parts of the world like India, Indonesia, etc, they do not run out with meat cleavers and try to behead non-believers on sight, lol


You are right, most muslims do not go around killing people.

However, lets apply this very reasoning to National Socialists. I assume that you also condemn "Naziphobia" because most NSDAP members did not go around killing people either. Therefor it is an irrational fear, or phobia, isnt it? We can apply this reasoning to any radical ideology that you wish, the possibilities are endless. (Maoism, Stalinism etc etc etc).

I must admit that I find it confusing how, the left especially, can support an ideology that is far more right-wing than any modern Neo-Conservative in the US would ever dare to go. Maybe you could give me an insight.
(edited 7 years ago)
Reply 66
Original post by The Epicurean
But you are socially right wing yourself :confused:
I think that because non-Muslim apologists for Islam tend to be pretty left-wing, we often forget that Islam is actually a very right-wing, socially conservative ideology.

The so-called Islamic Society on TSR would implement such a rule for Shia and Ahmadi Muslims long before such a policy would happen in the UK.
There are probably some on there who would consider the use of badges, erm, unnecessary.
Original post by alevelstresss
Islamophobia covers fear of Muslims or Islam

a fear of Muslims is completely unjustified and discriminatory, a fear of Islam is somewhat acceptable but stupid anyway - most people who actually fear Islam haven't even been to high percentage (ie 95%+) communities in remote parts of the world like India, Indonesia, etc, they do not run out with meat cleavers and try to behead non-believers on sight, lol


I'm not "scared" of Islam, I just think it's a pile of crap. I don't even think you what "Islamophobia" is lol.
Original post by Galaxie501
You are right, most muslims do not go around killing people.

However, lets apply this very reasoning to National Socialists. I assume that you also condemn "Naziphobia" because most NSDAP members did not go around killing people either. Therefor it is an irrational fear, or phobia, isnt it?

I must admit that I find it confusing how, the left especially, can support an ideology that is far more right-wing than any modern Neo-Conservative in the US would ever dare to go.


Yeah you also have no reason to fear national socialists. Being afraid of the Nazi regime is justified though, because many of them actively supported Hitler who actively ordered the gassing of millions of Jews, who conquered territory which was redistributed through internationally agreed treaties, who had secret police ordered to take any opponents of the Nazis into custody. Islam is far from this. You will find parts of it reminiscent of the same regime in ISIS-held territory, and you will see harsh punishments for what we would see as minor crimes.

What's more confusing is that anyone who has a respectful view of Islam and Muslims is instantly labelled as left wing. Generally I've found its something that people like you chuck into the pot because you are aware that your argument has no substance, so you think its an insult or somehow destabilises our argument to be labelled as 'left wing'. LOL
Original post by Dodgypirate
I'm not "scared" of Islam, I just think it's a pile of crap. I don't even think you what "Islamophobia" is lol.


You think its a pile of **** no doubt because you're scared of it.

If its any consideration. When I watched the Sydney Siege live on Sky News unfolding back in 2014, I was in the same boat as you, I hated Islam for it and I hated Muslims for it - I wanted them to be gone. But as I became more and more educated on the issue, I realised what the actual source of the problem is, and its not Islam, its hateful people and terrorist groups.

If you want to challenge my definition of Islamophobia, go ahead. My definition is "a fear/hatred of Islam or Muslims".
Original post by alevelstresss
Yeah you also have no reason to fear national socialists. Being afraid of the Nazi regime is justified though, because many of them actively supported Hitler who actively ordered the gassing of millions of Jews, who conquered territory which was redistributed through internationally agreed treaties, who had secret police ordered to take any opponents of the Nazis into custody. Islam is far from this. You will find parts of it reminiscent of the same regime in ISIS-held territory, and you will see harsh punishments for what we would see as minor crimes.

What's more confusing is that anyone who has a respectful view of Islam and Muslims is instantly labelled as left wing. Generally I've found its something that people like you chuck into the pot because you are aware that your argument has no substance, so you think its an insult or somehow destabilises our argument to be labelled as 'left wing'. LOL


15% of Muslims are radicals/jihadists.

That's roughly 240,000,000 fundamentalists. Ironically more than nazis!

It's a rational fear.
Original post by QE2
Profiling is a legitimate tool. Security cannot vet everyone, so they concentrate on those who fit the makeup of perpetrators of previous incidents of the type at issue.

Profiling black people would be appropriate if security was on high alert over imminent terrorist attack by an African-American violent terrorist organisation, for example.

Obviously, it will lead to innocent people being approached, but hey, big deal. I've been stopped and questioned when I hadn't done anything wrong. It was inconvenient but it didn't kill me, or even make me angry. Some people just need to suck it up and move on.


Were you stopped and questioned purely because of your race or religion? In the example you gave above, if I was stopped and questioned simply because I was black, or had someone call the police on me(no matter how security was on high alert over imminent terrorist attack by an African), then I would consider it a 'big deal' and would not 'suck it up'-it is racist. Likewise It's not acceptable to suspect every Muslim of being a terrorist, especially using justification such as someone reading an Arabic text. That is not a sound basis to conclude that someone might possess a threat. Disgusting to actually see people defending this(but not at all surprising.)
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by Dodgypirate
15% of Muslims are radicals/jihadists.

That's roughly 240,000,000 fundamentalists. Ironically more than nazis!

It's a rational fear.


Source?
Reply 73
Original post by Zamestaneh
Are all of your responses to posts cheap shots at the ISOC? No one in the ISOC would ever support that, including myself. Would expect better from you, although it seems you are keen to post gutter-worthy tripe.
But you and other regulars threw a turbo hissy-fit when someone merely suggested mentioning Shia resources in the ISOC welcome. It really was quite enlightening to see the barely concealed hatred of that "deviant practice". And you are seriously claiming that if such people had the power of life and death over them and the (even worse in your eyes) Ahmadiyya, you would treat them like long-lost brothers.
Yeah right!
Original post by Dodgypirate
How is it irrational?

We're living in a real fear of terrorism... sure the passengers got it wrong in this case, but that doesn't mean it's an "irrational" fear.


That's very true, but it's very ignorant of some people to think that just because someone is writing in arabic, then they're planning to do a terrorist act. It's a shame that innocent people are getting dehumanised and targeted because they follow a certain religion.
Original post by alevelstresss
You think its a pile of **** no doubt because you're scared of it.

If its any consideration. When I watched the Sydney Siege live on Sky News unfolding back in 2014, I was in the same boat as you, I hated Islam for it and I hated Muslims for it - I wanted them to be gone. But as I became more and more educated on the issue, I realised what the actual source of the problem is, and its not Islam, its hateful people and terrorist groups.

If you want to challenge my definition of Islamophobia, go ahead. My definition is "a fear/hatred of Islam or Muslims".


Well, it is a rather scary religion, to be fair.

I don't hate Muslims though, the ideology itself disgusts me - yet that still makes me an Islamophobe by your definition encompasses both the religion AND the people.

Your definition prevents any criticism of Islam.

I still hate Islam and will continue to hate it.
Original post by anahalls
That's very true, but it's very ignorant of some people to think that just because someone is writing in arabic, then they're planning to do a terrorist act. It's a shame that innocent people are getting dehumanised and targeted because they follow a certain religion.


It was an overreaction, I accept that, but in this day and age, it's understandable that people are so jumpy.

What we can't do is punish the people who complain, unless there are obvious racial undertones.
Original post by alevelstresss
Yeah you also have no reason to fear national socialists. Being afraid of the Nazi regime is justified though, because many of them actively supported Hitler who actively ordered the gassing of millions of Jews, who conquered territory which was redistributed through internationally agreed treaties, who had secret police ordered to take any opponents of the Nazis into custody. Islam is far from this. You will find parts of it reminiscent of the same regime in ISIS-held territory, and you will see harsh punishments for what we would see as minor crimes.

What's more confusing is that anyone who has a respectful view of Islam and Muslims is instantly labelled as left wing. Generally I've found its something that people like you chuck into the pot because you are aware that your argument has no substance, so you think its an insult or somehow destabilises our argument to be labelled as 'left wing'. LOL


I dont understand why you find issue with the "left wing" part. This is a general observation and I was adressing absolutely no one. All I wrote was "especially the left" which is correct.

Heres the thing. There is one reason, and one reason only why there are some moderate muslims. They chose to be moderate. They chose to not follow the Qur'an literally, word by word. To make it more clear, they chose to not blindly follow a religion that incorporates many values that are, coincidentally, also found in fascism. Furthermore, even the "moderate" muslims hold views that can not be considred moderate by any western standards. Open homophobia, xenophobia, bigotry and sexism are extremely wide spread in the respective regions. This is partly due to local culture and party due to the religion.

There is a reason the "west" has the most advanced societies and cultures in the history of mankind. We abandoned literal interpretations of religion. Thats why the most bible abiding conservative neighbourhodds in the US are also among the most uneducated.
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by Galaxie501
I dont understand why you find issue with the "left wing" part. This is a general observation and I was adressing absolutely no one. All I wrote was "especially the left" which is correct.

Heres the thing. There is one reason, and one reason only why there are some moderate muslims. They chose to be moderate. They chose to not follow the Qur'an literally, word by word. To make it more clear, they chose to not blindly follow a religion that incorporates many values that are, coincidentally, also found in fascism. Furthermore, even the "moderate" muslims hold views that can not be considred moderate by any western standards. Open homophobia, xenophobia, bigotry and sexism are extremely wide spread in the respective regions. This is partly due to local culture and party due to the religion.

There is a reason the "west" has the most advanced societies and cultures in the history of mankind. We abandoned literal interpretations of religion. Thats why the most bible abiding conservative neighbourhodds in the US are also among the most uneducated.

I have an alternative interpretation.

The reason the west is the most advanced set of societies is because we live in the most fertile, most interconnected, most productive lands. With the industrial revolution, our industry picked up massively, sciences such as chemistry and physics improved massively, people started getting paid more money, people could get jobs more easily, we abandoned our traditional ways of society and improvised on capitalist democracy, and it worked out.

The reason that the Middle East still has religious governments and stuff is because its a desert, with poor land for development, poor farming capacity. Furthermore it has suffered brutal warlords and regimes throughout history, and it still is now. In a land where you are at constant threat from invading barbarians, just as the Middle Easterners were, and where your life depends on you making a living for yourself and surviving in harsh conditions, and where the economy and industry have lesser capacity to skyrocket - of course more extremist religions are going to start appearing. Of course they will be integrated with politics, a religion which justifies killing any foreign threat is perfectly understandable in the harsh wasteland of the ME back 1500 years ago.

But that was long ago. The world has changed, and so have almost all Muslims. So blaming a backwards culture or a barbaric faith is unwarranted when there are some fairly obvious reasons as to why they existed.

When you have the capacity to cherry-pick what to follow, and what not to follow in a religion - the fault is with the extremists who exploit this, and not the religion, whose community has evidently adapted.
Bet that **** felt powerful

Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending