The Student Room Group

OCR Chemistry A Exam Thread (Breadth - May 27 2016 and Depth - June 10 2016)

Scroll to see replies

I got methylpropanoic acid?
Original post by 4nonymous
Yh it would. Also I think for yield it was 67.4%
As for the last question 43 peak does work with butanoic acid because its (CH3CH2CH2)+ ? Although I aint sure


Fair enough. But how would you get a secondary carbocation in butanoic acid?
Original post by Major Wilson
I got methylpropanoic acid?


😐...

Dang it.


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by ronnydandam
it was 'in the first 200 secs' not at 200 secs I think


I thought it said at. LOL we both "think"

Original post by asinghj
Check chemistry textbook page 148

CBA - its done with now so who cares. Just glad chem is over with.
Reply 964
Did anyone say it was flammable so heat with electric heater under reflux
Original post by Firenze26
Please tell me the last one about the mass spec question was Butanoic acid


Posted from TSR Mobile


I'm pretty sure it was. All the peaks (including 43) work fine with butanoic acid. I thought the mention of a secondary carbocation was just useless information - there isn't carbocations present in carboxylic acids anyway, only during reaction mechanisms right?
Reply 966
I put 67 percent to 2 sig figs do I lose any marks
Original post by LordStark
I'm pretty sure it was. All the peaks (including 43) work fine with butanoic acid. I thought the mention of a secondary carbocation was just useless information - there isn't carbocations present in carboxylic acids anyway, only during reaction mechanisms right?

I got methylbutanoic acid because I thought it would be able to make a secondary carbocation, but I dunno
Original post by 11234
Did anyone say it was flammable so heat with electric heater under reflux


That's the exact thing I wrote :smile: let's hope it's right! Haha


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by torilee
I got that as well. :h: I think that's the correct answer, but they'll probably give marks for butanoic acid as well, because it is an isomer of butanoic acid after all


I think butanoic acid would be 5/6 marks because it clearly mentioned secondary carbonation
Original post by Awsomedude
Mg was ionic I swear, it forms ionic bonds, not metllaic bonds.

Wasn't talking about MgO, just the metal itself.
it was butanoic aCid
you had TO times the EF C2H4O by two to get C4H802 OF WHICH THE MR WAS 88
THERE WAS ALSO AN M/Z PEAK AT 88 SUGGESTING IT WAS BUTANOIC ACID
IT COULDNT HAVE BEEN C2H40 SIMPLY BECUASE THAT ISNT A CARBOXYLIC ACID
THE IR SPEC CLEARLY INDICATED IT WAS A C ACID
THE MAS SPEC ALSO SAID THE MOST INTENSE PEAK WAS CAUSED BY A CARBOCATION WHICH WAS AT 43 OR 44
SO THE MR WAS 88
anyone agree?
Original post by Tyler213
Fair enough. But how would you get a secondary carbocation in butanoic acid?


Im not sure. I think it was methy-propanoic but I was just showing that you can have butanoic with that 43 m/z
I put butanoic but oh well
Original post by 4nonymous
Its metallic, ionic is between + and - ions metallic is between the + mg2+ ion and the delocalised electrons


that's 2 marks down
A secondary carbocation meant that the positive charge had to be on a carbon that had 2 other carbons attached. So its not useless information, its actually vital.
Original post by 11234
Did anyone say it was flammable so heat with electric heater under reflux


what? no, I put use a pear shaped flask and condenser so the vapours dont escape from the top which they would in the way they showed it.
Reply 976
Original post by Sophie7699
Yield was 67.4% :smile:

Wasn't it 67.5
Reply 977
67 percent alright to 2sf yea? Maybe?
Original post by asinghj
I think butanoic acid would be 5/6 marks because it clearly mentioned secondary carbonation


Probably. I'm just conscious of trying not to scare people who'd thought it was really easy into thinking that they've failed or something :tongue:
what did people write for the ozone depletion propagation steps?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending