# 2016 May 25th Edexcel Core 2 Questions and answers. [Unofficial mark scheme] 2016Watch

Announcements
2 years ago
#81
(Original post by UKoE Luna)
Awesome Thanks for clearing that up I wasn't quite sure if I was just allowed to remove the logs like that.
Yup! Any like terms on either side can be simply cancelled out, regardless of whether it's powers, logs, trigonometric functions etc etc
0
#82
Hi guys

if i put 5y + 3x - 95 = 0, will i still get the mark even though it said put it as 'ax + by + c = 0'?
yes
0
2 years ago
#83
(Original post by X_IDE_sidf)
yes
nice one thanks friend
0
2 years ago
#84
I don't know how i got higher on C2 its weird because I thought C1 would be easier.
0
#85
(Original post by Guèpard)
I don't know how i got higher on C2 its weird because I thought C1 would be easier.
Having done C1, C2, C3, C4, S1 and S2 I found C1 the hardest. This is because of the scope for mental maths error.
0
2 years ago
#86
(Original post by obeyyy)
any idea what the grade bondaries might be
It was harder than last years so hopefully around 59-62 for an A and 52-55 for B
0
2 years ago
#87
Can someone explaon how you got part c for question one? I jist tried it now and I got 4.8 but im sure in the exam I got different.

Also the radius for tje circle. I completely forgot the formula so I tried completing the square for which I got like 10.6/ 113
0
#88
(Original post by Kholmes1)
Can someone explaon how you got part c for question one? I jist tried it now and I got 4.8 but im sure in the exam I got different.

Also the radius for tje circle. I completely forgot the formula so I tried completing the square for which I got like 10.6/ 113

(3 d.p.)
0
2 years ago
#89
(Original post by X_IDE_sidf)

(3 d.p.)
Oh god, I just realised that I did the sum formula. Idk how, i just did.
0
2 years ago
#90
Not sure how everyone else found it, I smashed it, 74/75 according to the unofficial mark scheme. Thankfully got a lot of time to revise S1 now XD
0
2 years ago
#91
(Original post by X_IDE_sidf)

(3 d.p.)
dont you get negative 1.602 so if you wrote -1.602 as the difference is it wrong
0
2 years ago
#92
(Original post by bulletman54)
dont you get negative 1.602 so if you wrote -1.602 as the difference is it wrong
Lol it doesn't matter, they will most likely ignore the sign, they just told you to find the difference its like saying if i had 5 apples one day and had 10 the next day what would be the difference in the amount of apples i had in those 2 days it wont be -5 but just 5 but the minus i think they will ignore so you will get full marks.
0
2 years ago
#93
Guys do you think 59-61 will be an A as last year it was 59 for an A and it was pretty easy compared to this.
0
2 years ago
#94
(Original post by TheProKi)
Lol it doesn't matter, they will most likely ignore the sign, they just told you to find the difference its like saying if i had 5 apples one day and had 10 the next day what would be the difference in the amount of apples i had in those 2 days it wont be -5 but just 5 but the minus i think they will ignore so you will get full marks.
Safe G was worried about that
0
2 years ago
#95
(Original post by Qweudhs56)
1.b. Is wrong. The answer is -1.602. It has to be negative because in geometric sequence, the biggest term is subtract by the smallest.

Therefore 64(3/4)^9 - 64(3/4)^8 = -1.602 (to three decimal places).

P.S. I don't know if the markscheme would say 'ignore' signs.

I've seen a similar past paper question and it does say ignore signs, i also got negative.
0
2 years ago
#96
9 d) is wrong, x was a really long decimal. If you used the full decimal you would have got 121.5... Something rounding up to 122. You are not supposed to round x as that is too early.

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
2 years ago
#97
(Original post by dididid)

I swear b= (a-5)/9 ??
0
2 years ago
#98
(Original post by Verdahf)
Do you know how many marks this part was for?
this was deffo b=(a-5)/9

unless im mistaken because i just did it again
0
#99
Here is the 1 b equivalent from 2006

(Original post by Sam53)
9 d) is wrong, x was a really long decimal. If you used the full decimal you would have got 121.5... Something rounding up to 122. You are not supposed to round x as that is too early.

Posted from TSR Mobile
No, you are wrong, please re-check.
0
#100
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/atta...1&d=1464204940 <-- NEW PDF. This is V2 and has been layed out in a more stylish manner and has Q 9c corrected

Edit: to satisfy my ocd, the real scanned paper will be hitting shelves soon.
0
X

new posts
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### University open days

• Brunel University London
Wed, 22 May '19
• University of Roehampton
Wed, 22 May '19
• Sheffield Hallam University
Wed, 22 May '19

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### How did your Edexcel GCSE Maths Paper 1 go?

Loved the paper - feeling positive (52)
25.24%
The paper was reasonable (90)
43.69%
Not feeling great about that exam (34)
16.5%
It was TERRIBLE (30)
14.56%