Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

20 Right wing men rub fake poo on a four-year-old Asian girl’s face outside a pub Watch

    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TercioOfParma)
    Well, ethnic extermination isn't a fundamentally right wing thing either. Point to me one policy that was right wing? Fascism actually evolved out of socialism, go and google mussolini.
    I think their reasoning goes like "killing people is mean! right wingers are mean! they must be the same!!!"
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WBZ144)
    Knew that the thread would be hijacked by people trying to excuse and justify this. Watching and cheering him on makes them complicit in the attack, it's NOT rocket science.

    So many hateful people on this forum.
    Have you even read the posts? No-one's been justifying the attack.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MildredMalone)
    Have you even read the posts? No-one's been justifying the attack.

    To be fair, her family are probably linked with terrrorism. What kind of poobags make a four year old wear a headscarf? I think that's indicative of extreme views.
    I have indeed, and there are a number of people like you who are attempting to blame the victims inot some way, instead of focusing on the actual crime.

    Did it say that she herself was wearing a headscarf? It may well have been talking about her mother and grandmother.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MildredMalone)
    Have you even read the posts? No-one's been justifying the attack.


    To be fair, her family are probably linked with terrrorism. What kind of poobags make a four year old wear a headscarf? I think that's indicative of extreme views.
    Islamic culture? The same reason why any other family of a certain culture will make their children wear cultural clothing.

    But of course, making your child wear a headscarf is a stone throw away from putting on a suicide vest.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by PrincessZara)
    **** like this makes my blood boil like wtfff.

    20 Right wing men rub fake poo on a four-year-old Muslim, Asian girl’s face outside a pub in a racism attack,
    They were targeted because they were wearing headscarves and Asian clothes.

    http://metro.co.uk/2016/07/19/men-ru...ttack-6015714/
    1 man did it the 20 others laughed, so the title is a bit misleading in that. Even with the increase in racial hate it is still very minute compared to the 70's, 80's and 90's. It is a white area, Worcester has a white population of 91%, something to aspire to, and very little asians, fantastic approach. It is disguising, but i see the frustrations of white people and the increasing immigrant population it is not British, they should rename the United Kingdom to the " United Europeans and Asians convention. Ain't it against there religion to be near a pub/ Alcohol. Ultimately if the parents of the Asian girl does not like it they can go back to there country of residence. Do you condone the muslim scum which did the 7/7 attacks and killed Lee Rigby, I guess not. I guess you are so anti British you prefer our enemies such as Iraq and Russia to England


    What's happening now in England is similiar to what happened in Germany in the 1930's but still has a few phases to go, In germany there was a great depression, the price of oil is going down, which is a good indicator something is on the horizon, bond yield is going up meaning there is an higher risk in buying the governments debts, what happened they went to Facism killed everyone they didn't like but in the long term they have been very successful, Hitler project which was VW was a great success
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by simon_g)
    oh, i see the lying."(..)One man attacked the young child and her grandmother, while his 20 or so friends laughed and cheered, outside the Royal Exchange in Cornmarket at around 4pm.(..)"

    so- PrincessZara, do you always manipulate like that or only in topic related to the muzzies?

    not to mention that forcing 4 year old to wear a head scarf is idiotic. or were they afraid it will sexually provoke (muslim) men?
    Where is the lying?

    Nawaz’s sister believes they were targeted because they were wearing headscarves and Asian clothes.

    Police are treating the incident as racially motivated.
    The headscarves indicate that they were, possibly, Muslim. The young girl's uncle also has a Muslim name.

    Are you suggesting that it was the girl's parents/grandparents fault for allowing their child to wear a headscarf? It shows a lot about you character when you criticise the victims and not address the actual attack.

    Then again, I expect no more from people like you. Racist and Islamophobic, perhaps?
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RichardSkew)
    Can I just say, and advise, that you do what I did. Just leave this thread. It has become ugly. People are blaming the girl and her parents and Muslims in this. I would never have thought we will hit this low... but here we are.

    This is the most depressing thread in ages.
    You're quite right; calling them out won't make them less hateful, unfortunately.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by champ_mc99)
    Islamic culture? The same reason why any other family of a certain culture will make their children wear cultural clothing.

    But of course, making your child wear a headscarf is a stone throw away from putting on a suicide vest.
    In a nutshell the purpose of the headscarf is to be sexually unappealing. A child shouldn't be wearing one, because it implies that a child is a valid target of lust. So either the family think there might be another Muhammed around, or they're dangerously attached to their culture, which might suggest extreme views.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RichardSkew)
    Who on this thread said that? You took a little girl being attacked and brought islam into it.

    You are disgusting vile person. I feel sorry for anyone who has the misfortune of knowing you in real life. You give us a bad name. Shame on you. This is a little girl who has zero things to do with Islamic terrorism (just like the actual Billion others of Muslims) and you STILL thought it was appropriate to compare it and and say islamic terrorism is worse.

    Yes it is worse, but this has nothing to do with that. A girl was attacked. This is some ones little daughter, someone's little girl.

    Idiot go away.
    Oh I'm so vile, for pointing out something. I am so EEEEEEEEVIL. Never said she did. Calm your tits.

    You realise by having such an overreaction you only make yourself look stupid right?
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Absolutely disgusting
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Antediluvian)
    People are finally starting to fight back.
    Fighting against 4 year olds? Then again, these are cowardly, despicable right wing criminals we're talking about here.

    It doesn't take much to terrorise children. Maybe they should have tried doing that to a group of grown men/women and see how successful they were.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RichardSkew)
    The bottom line is your brought islamic terrorism and compared it to this attack. You are not stupid, you know what you are doing. You still are vile. Eff off please.
    No, I eff off when I please sweetie. I have already addressed why I did it, so that the leftists couldn't claim it was all the EEEEVIL right wing without some dissenting opinion.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MildredMalone)
    In a nutshell the purpose of the headscarf is to be sexually unappealing. A child shouldn't be wearing one, because it implies that a child is a valid target of lust. So either the family think there might be another Muhammed around, or they're dangerously attached to their culture, which might suggest extreme views.
    That may be true, but don't you think that is a risk to national security? by only seeing someones eyes they can commit crimes and get away with it. Furthermore, from just someones eyes, In areas of high asain communities if one of them does a murder and a witness says " She was wearing religious clothing and I could only see eyes" it will be case closed. I seriously think we need to follow the French and ban the headscarfs at least then you can tell who's who. It would be a bit like me wearing a wooly hat on my head and a football scarf around by nose and mouth and refuse to move it when the police come.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RichardSkew)
    No one did. You brought up islamic terrorism out of the blue. If some leftist do what you claim, we, dear sweetie, would be on the same side here.

    But you went ahead and said what you said, and you still defend it.
    *did. Yes I do, it always happens.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MyBloodisBlue)
    That may be true, but don't you think that is a risk to national security? by only seeing someones eyes they can commit crimes and get away with it. Furthermore, from just someones eyes, In areas of high asain communities if one of them does a murder and a witness says " She was wearing religious clothing and I could only see eyes" it will be case closed. I seriously think we need to follow the French and ban the headscarfs at least then you can tell who's who. It would be a bit like me wearing a wooly hat on my head and a football scarf around by nose and mouth and refuse to move it when the police come.
    I'm not the one to direct that question at, with respect I think you might have missed my point. To answer your question though, I absolutely do think islamic face coverings should be banned.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MildredMalone)
    In a nutshell the purpose of the headscarf is to be sexually unappealing. A child shouldn't be wearing one, because it implies that a child is a valid target of lust. So either the family think there might be another Muhammed around, or they're dangerously attached to their culture, which might suggest extreme views.
    You think they went as far as thinking their daughter could be the target of a sexual predator rather than making her wear the headscarf because it's a part of their cultural values and could also help them get their daughter into heavan?

    Also, I've seen Sikhs and Jewish kids, younger than four, that wear religious attire (those cute little hats and turbans). How far are they from setting off a bomb?

    "Another Muhammed around" implying there may be Muslim sexual predators stalking her? So only Muslims can be sexual predators?

    "Dangerously attached to their culture". Yes of course, one moment its the headscarf, the next is a suicide vest.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MildredMalone)
    I'm not the one to direct that question at, with respect I think you might have missed my point. To answer your question though, I absolutely do think islamic face coverings should be banned.
    I know what you was saying but I was just stating that they shouldnt be wore in England, I was just stating that its also a security threat, and as for radical muslims there are far more then what people think
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by simon_g)
    oh, i see the lying."(..)One man attacked the young child and her grandmother, while his 20 or so friends laughed and cheered, outside the Royal Exchange in Cornmarket at around 4pm.(..)"

    so- PrincessZara, do you always manipulate like that or only in topic related to the muzzies?

    not to mention that forcing 4 year old to wear a head scarf is idiotic. or were they afraid it will sexually provoke (muslim) men?
    What about you? Do you always use derogatory terms?
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MyBloodisBlue)
    That may be true, but don't you think that is a risk to national security? by only seeing someones eyes they can commit crimes and get away with it. Furthermore, from just someones eyes, In areas of high asain communities if one of them does a murder and a witness says " She was wearing religious clothing and I could only see eyes" it will be case closed. I seriously think we need to follow the French and ban the headscarfs at least then you can tell who's who. It would be a bit like me wearing a wooly hat on my head and a football scarf around by nose and mouth and refuse to move it when the police come.
    What are you talking about? No one is talking about the niqab/face veil. They are talking about the headscarf - the one that covers the hair only.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TercioOfParma)
    RIGHT WING TERROR: Smears poo on 4 year old girl (Ew, disgusting, reprehensible), 1 proper recent terror attack (Brevik)

    ISLAMIC TERROR: Run over and kill around 80 people with a truck (Disgusting, Reprehensible, Evil), weekly murders, honour killings, and bombings.

    Also, 20 people to 1 4 year old girl?
    Thanks for putting it into perspective ; your post has done an excellent job of that.

    (Original post by swiss_cheese)
    while you're at it, bring up the nazi regime too
    On the premise that the Nazi regime was right wing (I haven't researched the matter to make assertions) didn't that end 71 years ago? I don't see why you bring it up as relevant to current affairs.

    (Original post by Themini)
    Power trip. Humiliation, domination, displaying hatred? Who knows, the far right are a sick bunch of *******. They really are vile human beings.
    Yes, the article said the sister of the victim suspected that they were targeted because they were wearing headscarves and Asian clothes, and that the police is treating the case as racially-motivated.

    But let's be sure not to think that the far right have an exclusive claim to these contextually deplorable qualities.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: July 24, 2016
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Are unpaid trial work shifts fair?
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.