Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Yes but you can't say that 33 (mod 10) = 3*11 (mod 10) and therefore 33 mod 10 is divisible by 3 and 11 (but not 9 so it can't be a square, which is what the proof says).
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SsEe)
    Yes but you can't say that 33 (mod 10) = 3*11 (mod 10) and therefore 33 mod 10 is divisible by 3 and 11 (but not 9 so it can't be a square, which is what the proof says).
    No, 33 (mod 10) is not necessarily divisible by 3 or 11.
    43 = 33 (mod 10)...
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    Oh! Yeah, what you're saying makes perfect sense. The mix-up was on my part. Here's another way to look at the question:

    For n>4, S always ends in 3 and hence isn't a perfect square.

    Proving that if a number ends in 3 it isn't a perfect square basically uses SsEe's method.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by dvs)
    I don't get what you're saying. The proof isn't really dividing per se, it's considering the prime decomposition of 33 (mod 10).
    just to add, some care is needed when saying prime in mod arithmetic.
    for example 3=3.1 and 3=9.7 mod 10.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Even better and slicker, mod 5.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    Can 801,345,230,914 be written as the sum of 3 cubes?
    Is the answer yes?
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Is that a guess or do you have some reasoning to go with that?
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    I have some reasoning. (That I don't want to show in case I'm talking BS again. )
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Well let's see the reasoning then.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    Let's consider perfect cubes modulo 7:
    a³ = b (mod 7)
    0³=0, 1³=1, 2³=1, 3³=-1, 4³=1, 5³=-1, 6³=-1 and 7³=0 (all mod 7)

    So perfect cubes leave remainders 0, 1 or -1 when divided by 7. In other words, perfect cubes are of the form:
    7k+1, 7k-1 or 7k.

    Now consider the sum of 3 cubes of the form 7k-1, it'd be of the form 7p-3=7n+4. So numbers of the form 7n+4 can be written as the sum of 3 perfect cubes. Let's check this for n={1,2,3}:
    7*1+4 = 11 = 3³ + (-2)³ + (-2)³
    7*2+4 = 18 = 3³ + (-2)³ + (-1)³
    7*3+4 = 25 = 3³ + (-1)³ + (-1)³

    Finally, let's consider 801,345,230,914 modulo 7:
    801,345,230,914 = 4 (mod 7), which means it's of the form 7k+4 and can be written as the sum of 3 cubes.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Nice. Sadly you've only proved that a solution exists modulo 7.

    I have another question.
    a² + b² = 6ab. Find the value of (a+b)/(a-b).
    This is from an SMC so shouldn't be too hard.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    a² + b² = (a+b)² - 2ab = (a-b)² + 2ab = 6ab

    So (a+b)/(a-b) = sqrt((a+b)²/(a-b)²) = sqrt(8ab/4ab) = sqrt(2)
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Well done . I knew the efforts of the TSR mathmos wouldn't fail to solve that really hard question :rolleyes: hehe
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SsEe)
    Nice. Sadly you've only proved that a solution exists modulo 7.
    But isn't that sufficient? I mean, I showed that numbers of the form 7k+4 can be written as the sum of 3 perfect cubes, and then showed that the number in the question is of the form 7k+4.

    How'd you do it?
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    You showed that numbers of the form 7k+4 can be written as 3 cubes modulo 7. In fact it can't be written as 3 cubes:
    Consider modulo 9:
    cubes modulo 9 can only be 0, 1 or 8.
    If a solution exists:
    a³ + b³ + c³ = 801,345,230,914
    +-(0, 1 or 8) +- (0, 1 or 8) +- (0, 1 or 8) = 4 (mod 9)
    (+- because 1=-8 and 8=-1)
    No combination of these make 4 mod 9 so no solution can exist.
    If it was congruent to any of these there would be a solution mod 9 (but not necessarily mod 1) : 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 (I think that's all).

    Somebody should check this as I'm having some doubts.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SsEe)
    You showed that numbers of the form 7k+4 can be written as 3 cubes modulo 7. In fact it can't be written as 3 cubes:
    Consider modulo 9:
    cubes modulo 9 can only be 0, 1 or 8.
    If a solution exists:
    a³ + b³ + c³ = 801,345,230,914
    +-(0, 1 or 8) +- (0, 1 or 8) +- (0, 1 or 8) = 4 (mod 9)
    (+- because 1=-8 and 8=-1)
    No combination of these make 4 mod 9 so no solution can exist.
    If it was congruent to any of these there would be a solution mod 9 (but not necessarily mod 1) : 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 (I think that's all).

    Somebody should check this as I'm having some doubts.
    Sorry, I cant see how you need to get 4 (mod 9) :confused:.
    801 = 0 (mod 9), 345 = 3 (mod 9), so you cant say anything about these two... However,
    230 and 914 = 5 (mod 9), but since cubes modulo 9 are -1,0,1, no sum of 3 can make 5, so these 2 cannot be written as the sum of 3 cubes.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by dvs)
    But isn't that sufficient? I mean, I showed that numbers of the form 7k+4 can be written as the sum of 3 perfect cubes, and then showed that the number in the question is of the form 7k+4.

    How'd you do it?
    No, it is not a sufficient condition. You have not proved that *every* single number which can be written in the form 7k+4 can be written as the sum of 3 cubes, only that the sum of 3 cubes will always be a number of the form 7k+4.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by JamesF)
    No, it is not a sufficient condition. You have not proved that *every* single number which can be written in the form 7k+4 can be written as the sum of 3 cubes, only that the sum of 3 cubes will always be a number of the form 7k+4.
    I don't think he's proven that, because it isn't true. e.g. 0^3 + 0^3 + 0^3.

    Rather he has shown that mod 7 considerations don't provide reasons why a number of the form 7k+4 couldn't be written as the sum of three cubes.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RichE)
    I don't think he's proven that, because it isn't true. e.g. 0^3 + 0^3 + 0^3.

    Rather he has shown that mod 7 considerations don't provide reasons why a number of the form 7k+4 couldn't be written as the sum of three cubes.
    Oops yea, I didnt read the actual post lol
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    345 = 7^3 + 1^3 + 1^3.

    9^3 < 801 < 10^3, so a,b,c < 10
    One of the cubes must be larger than 801/3 = 267, therefore
    10 > a > 6
    Then try a = 7,8,9
    801 - 9^3 = 72,
    801 - 8^3 = 289
    801 - 7^3 = 458
    Then its the same but showing each of those can or cannot be written as the sum of 2 cubes.
    Starting with 72, 5 > b > 3, so b = 4, c = 2
    So we have a solution
    801 = 9^3 + 4^3 + 2^3
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Brexit voters: Do you stand by your vote?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Write a reply...
    Reply
    Hide
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.