Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

9/11 Conspiracy theory. What do you think? Watch

  • View Poll Results: What happened on 9/11?
    An inside job by the US government. The US carried out the attacks intentionally for alterior motives.
    42.02%

    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ijaz)

    if the government had no involvement why dont they investigate, why when first responders who were given the green light to clearup, told that the air was safe to breath and up to 50,000 are dieing.
    you must think that the government gives a **** about us but they dont.
    it's full of people who make promises just to get into power and then break them i.e Nick clegg.
    all these cuts,on welfare, healthcare, education,high unemployemnt and the taxes are still going up and the bankers are still getting big bonuses.
    taking the power away from the people and giving to the bankers.


    all world governments are corrupt and we need to stand up and say no
    Still can't answer my point that there is no way explosives brought down those buildings unless you beliieve teams of people managed to plant tons of explosives throughout the building managed t take down certain support beams all without being found out?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Aj12)
    Still can't answer my point that there is no way explosives brought down those buildings unless you beliieve teams of people managed to plant tons of explosives throughout the building managed t take down certain support beams all without being found out?
    how should i beleive what you just said when in your previos pst you said you thought building 7 fell the way it did becasue some stuff fell on top of it.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ijaz)
    how should i beleive what you just said when in your previos pst you said you thought building 7 fell the way it did becasue some stuff fell on top of it.
    Not quite some stuff falling on it. More mass amounts of burning wreckage hit the side of the building starting fires throughout but still.

    Anyway. As for believing me don't, go and look up yourself what it takes to bring down a building in a controlled demolition then ask yourself how all that prep could be done with no one finding out
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by simontinsley)
    Probably the same way the Bush administration felt after about 100,000 civilians in Iraq died as a result of their invasion, but 33 times less guilty. Besides, the same argument as below applies, someone did it, and someone has to live with the guilt, I don't see why that guilt should be particularly different on whom you are.


    Consider this, it may be difficult, but yet someone managed it. Whether it was the terrorists, US administration, or any other organisation and they had to keep it secret, and they managed it. Unless you believe that the US government is particularly less competent than other organisations then that's not a valid argument against the conspiracy theories.

    The only valid arguments are those based on the evidence, such as the nature of the falls, and so forth. I don't have a strong enough scientific background to assess that evidence but I don't think that leaky fallacious arguments work.

    Thats an accident, totally different story, there was even a documentry showing how US troops killed a family, they felt such guilt ( even crying) that they decided to pay up few K's to the father.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    defo US conspiracy :mad:
    didn't you see the flash across the building BEFORE the impact which made it collapse? and yes, it did break in a rather straight manner.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ijaz)
    oh my god if you think thats how a building would collapse like it did beacuse a lot of stuff hit it you definately need to reasearch.
    see what i mean you cant explain how building 7 fell and how larry silverstein the leaseholder got paid big time compensation.
    and ill try to get the interview where he said he told them to pull it down.

    if the government had no involvement why dont they investigate, why when first responders who were given the green light to clearup, told that the air was safe to breath and up to 50,000 are dieing.
    you must think that the government gives a **** about us but they dont.
    it's full of people who make promises just to get into power and then break them i.e Nick clegg.
    all these cuts,on welfare, healthcare, education,high unemployemnt and the taxes are still going up and the bankers are still getting big bonuses.
    taking the power away from the people and giving to the bankers.


    all world governments are corrupt and we need to stand up and say no

    So true goverments don't give a dam about ordinary smucks like you and me.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Swimmer)
    Thats an accident, totally different story, there was even a documentry showing how US troops killed a family, they felt such guilt ( even crying) that they decided to pay up few K's to the father.
    killed the family and payed him a few ks and thats everything sorted. and youve just seen one documentry this doesnt mean theyre doing this to every family. theyere never gonna win in iraq end of story thousands of troops and civilians dieing for an illegal war which was on the basis of weapons of mass destruction.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvliUuXjbL4

    this shows how much he really cares about how many troopsare getting killed taking the mess out of weapons of mass destruction he and blair should be tried for war crime.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Aj12)
    Not quite some stuff falling on it. More mass amounts of burning wreckage hit the side of the building starting fires throughout but still.

    Anyway. As for believing me don't, go and look up yourself what it takes to bring down a building in a controlled demolition then ask yourself how all that prep could be done with no one finding out
    howcould something free fall by things falling on it and fire opf a building so high.

    this is supposed to be a democracy and the government just telling us what they do and say it's in the best interest of people.

    1-4 years youll find out that the government dont give a crap about people.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by S129439)
    Thought I would make a thread on this.

    Now firstly, I don't necessarily believe it was an inside job. So I don't consider myself a 'conspiracy theorist'. The poll is just to see what others think.

    I find some of the inconsistencies and contrary evidence/circumstances to the official government line very interesting. Perhaps small information has been withheld or changed to change the way we see it or react to it.

    Here is loose change (a video highlighting said inconsistencies) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE

    Now it would be ignorant of me or anyone to take this as gospel. But there are some good points which don't seem to be answered.

    Any theories or explanations welcome.
    It was all done by the US themselves, so they have reasons to fight against Islamists, who don't even exist. They are the ones that are spreading terrorism by killing the entire country of Iraq. They are the biggest terrorists themselves.

    A plane could never bring the whole building down and this is scientifically and engineerically proven by many. It were explosives that were installed on the WTC that brought the building down and not ssome 2 planes.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ijaz)
    howcould something free fall by things falling on it and fire opf a building so high.

    this is supposed to be a democracy and the government just telling us what they do and say it's in the best interest of people.

    1-4 years youll find out that the government dont give a crap about people.
    But your making assertions without any evidence to base it on.

    There has never been a fire like this in a building like this so there is nothing to compare it to. Fire has never brought down a skyscraper but no skyscraper has had a fully fueld plane flown into it.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by llpokermuffinll)
    It was all done by the US themselves, so they have reasons to fight against Islamists, who don't even exist. They are the ones that are spreading terrorism by killing the entire country of Iraq. They are the biggest terrorists themselves.

    A plane could never bring the whole building down and this is scientifically and engineerically proven by many. It were explosives that were installed on the WTC that brought the building down and not ssome 2 planes.
    Look up what it takes to briing down a building in a controlled demolition and the amount of explosives needed. Then ask yourself if this many people could be involved. Because for them to install explosives and prep the building for demolition theneveryone in those towers must have known including the people who died
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Aj12)
    Look up what it takes to briing down a building in a controlled demolition and the amount of explosives needed. Then ask yourself if this many people could be involved. Because for them to install explosives and prep the building for demolition theneveryone in those towers must have known including the people who died
    Was it just a coincidence that no Jews were working that day? They all knew about it.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by llpokermuffinll)
    Was it just a coincidence that no Jews were working that day? They all knew about it.
    :facepalm2:
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Aj12)
    :facepalm2:
    You don't have an answer to this do you/ Thats why you only put the facepalm there. Right?
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by llpokermuffinll)
    You don't have an answer to this do you/ Thats why you only put the facepalm there. Right?
    No. I facepalmed because what your saying is so unbelievable stupid I cannot even begin to describe what a moron you are
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Aj12)
    No. I facepalmed because what your saying is so unbelievable stupid I cannot even begin to describe what a moron you are
    You know who the bigger moron is? Yes, you!

    Because saying this nonsens won't get you nowhere. I would rather try to answer that fact that why there were no Jews there that day? And all you can say is rubbish like that, which is completely off topic. Why don't you stick to the topic and rather than calling me a moron, try to explain why there were no Jews there?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I think the conspiracy theories are ridiculous! I think because of America's subsequent actions (Iraq etc) some people just want to blame them for everything!
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by llpokermuffinll)
    You know who the bigger moron is? Yes, you!

    Because saying this nonsens won't get you nowhere. I would rather try to answer that fact that why there were no Jews there that day? And all you can say is rubbish like that, which is completely off topic. Why don't you stick to the topic and rather than calling me a moron, try to explain why there were no Jews there?
    There were Jews there that day. At least 270 Jewish people died on 9/11, including 5 Israeli citzens.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BellaBoo)
    I think the conspiracy theories are ridiculous! I think because of America's subsequent actions (Iraq etc) some people just want to blame them for everything!
    what about building 7 in which no plane hit
    people where asking question before the iraq invasion which was in 2004.
    oh and where are the weapons of mass destruction
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Aj12)
    But your making assertions without any evidence to base it on.

    There has never been a fire like this in a building like this so there is nothing to compare it to. Fire has never brought down a skyscraper but no skyscraper has had a fully fueld plane flown into it.
    your making insertion without any concrete evidence and you still cant explain building 7 in which no plane crashed, did that free fall into it's own foundation by a fire aswell.

    it is impossible for a building of that size to fall into its own imprint without the use of explosive.

    youve got no evidence that kerosene with fire can cause the temperature to increase so high to melt steel.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Did TEF Bronze Award affect your UCAS choices?
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.