The Student Room Group

Banning Gay Kissing on TV

Scroll to see replies

so everyone thinks its ok for primary school kids to watch two gay men tongue it out on TV?

erm, be serious here...

i have a 4 year old brother, and lets not forget about the muslims
(edited 12 years ago)
Not going to happen. And if it did, then straight kissing should be banned too.

Original post by God_X
There's nothing ignorant in following the teachings of Christ. Atheists, on the other hand, take every opportunity they can to attack Christians whilst they have no evidence to prove their claims. It's silly, arrogant people like you who are ignorant.


Oh the irony.
Saying atheists have no evidence? lol.
Made me laugh anyway.

Original post by God_X
But you have absolutely nothing to base your beliefs upon,


Neither do you.
Oh, the Bible. A book written by some people that contains so many incosistancies that it cannot be taken seriously. A book that is so at odds with itself, that even Christians do not know what parts to take as fact, what parts to take as metaphor, and what parts to ignore totally. A book that advocates slavery etc etc. Yeah, because that is so reliable. :rolleyes:
(edited 12 years ago)
Let's ban people who pronounce 'with' as 'wiv' next!
Original post by philosophucker
so everyone thinks its ok for primary school kids to watch two gay men tongue it out on TV?

erm, be serious here...

i have a 4 year old brother, and lets not forget about the muslims


Well society thinks its ok for primary school kids to see straight couples "tongue it out" on TV, and there is no different between that and a gay couple doing it.

And what do muslims have to do with anything :confused:
Original post by WelshBluebird
Well society thinks its ok for primary school kids to see straight couples "tongue it out" on TV, and there is no different between that and a gay couple doing it.
yes there is.

Original post by WelshBluebird
And what do muslims have to do with anything :confused:
stop trying to act ultra-respectful. you know exactly what i'm talking about.
Original post by philosophucker
yes there is.

stop trying to act ultra-respectful. you know exactly what i'm talking about.


1 - No there isn't.

2 - No i really don't.
Original post by WelshBluebird
1 - No there isn't.
how would you react if you saw your son watching two men lipsing on cbeebies?

Original post by WelshBluebird
2 - No i really don't.
you'd have better luck trying to force a fart out of your earlobe than to expect me to believe you.
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by philosophucker
how would you react if you saw your son watching two men lipsing on cbeebies?

you'd have better luck trying to force a fart out of your earlobe than expect me to believe you.


1 - As far as I am aware, you do not get straight kissing on cbeebies either, so I don't see why you are bringing that up.

2 - Oh well. I may aswell start trying. Because I really have no idea what muslims have to do with this. Unless you are trying to suggest that the government wants to cosy up to muslim extremists. Which I can't see happening.
(edited 12 years ago)
Original post by Aj12
Is there a better source?


I put some links earlier on in the story about the rport which wants seductive behavior banning before the watershed and the dm article about that using gay kissing as the example. Its just people reading headlines and not the full story that has led to this.
Original post by Cartopher
A book eh, so I too am to assume there is a magical school of wizardry named Hogwarts that is hidden from us muggles? A book is not proof of anything.


Um, yeah. Where do you think I've been studying since I was 11? This isn't The Worst Witch, you know. Of course Hogwarts is real. :rolleyes: Ignorant muggles.
Reply 110
Avatar for LPK
LPK
20
Original post by WelshBluebird
Oh, the Bible. A book written by some people that contains so many incosistancies that it cannot be taken seriously. A book that is so at odds with itself, that even Christians do not know what parts to take as fact, what parts to take as metaphor, and what parts to ignore totally. A book that advocates slavery etc etc. Yeah, because that is so reliable. :rolleyes:


It's a source of good according to God_X's earlier posts.

Ya know, all that killing rebellious children and stoning people who dare make their own decisions in life. If that's considered good for some people then I don't want to know what 'bad' is to them. 0_0

Oh, and the God_X person who is trying particularly hard to be controversial, I haz a quote for you. Taken straight from Frankie Boyle himself:

"A man who lies with another man should be stoned. It helps, that's all I'm saying".

That is the closest the bible has got to being right on this issue. :wink:
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 111
Avatar for Profesh
Profesh
20
Original post by philosophucker
how would you react if you saw your son watching two men lipsing on cbeebies?


Why, I imagine in much the same way as I'd react to such a scenario enacted between members of the opposite sex: by taking him aside and educating him on the subject so that he doesn't turn out like you.
This is the review into the commercialisation and sexualisation of childhood that was prompted by the same newspaper condemning Tesco for selling pole dancing kits for children. :facepalm:

The report hasn't even been published yet but they have released the preliminary results of a survey which shows what parents think on the matter.
[INDENT]For some parents, what has been considered acceptable in the past - such as that Brookside kiss - is not appropriate for children to see early in the evening." [/INDENT]
How can the PM be blamed for the results of a survey of British parents? Surely it's better to try and understand the range of opinions that exists on the matter. Just because some parents believe that doesn't mean Cameron agrees.

So yes, the PM commissioned a report that will only be advisory, hasn't been written yet and will take into account the views of parents, to enable those parents to prevent their children from being exploited. The clearest evidence that the PM is a homophobe I've ever seen. :facepalm2:
Original post by Profesh
Why, I imagine in much the same way as I'd react to such a scenario enacted between members of the opposite sex: by taking him aside and educating him on the subject so that he doesn't turn out like you.
trust me man, if my son turned out like you i would bust a bin laden without hesitation
(edited 12 years ago)
Reply 114
Avatar for Ste_2505
Ste_2505
Original post by SFsucks
Ha, the truth, the truth


He can't handle the truth!
if this does happen then will gays not be allowed to kiss in public, or will we all be thrown into prison again? lol

errm, a condem government really does seem to be a more and more stupid arrangement as we carry on through the term.
Only if you do it in a skip.
Reply 117
Avatar for Planar
Planar
15
Original post by Tesphena
Source.

Part of the Conservative manifesto was a claim to be tackling homophobia, so I'm wondering why they are supporting descrimination such as this? If gay kissing is too indecent for pre-watershed hours then why is straight kissing fine? Has our Prime Minister been haunted by the ghost of Mary Whitehouse? What's going on here? :confused:


He wants to do what? That ****ing ****. I wish David Davis was PM instead
Reply 118
Avatar for SFsucks
SFsucks
15
Original post by Ste_2505
He can't handle the truth!


hahaha

it's just another religious nut.
Reply 119
Avatar for Enoch.
Enoch.
16
ahh It was a thread similar to this that gave me two red gems before the update...


I can't even express my opinion on these sorts of threads.

Quick Reply

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you