Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blazar)
    I'm guessing you're Christian because of the anti-choice stance and the constant references to God.

    James 4:12 - There is only one lawgiver and judge, he who is able to save and to destroy. But who are you to judge your neighbour?

    And yet you think it's appropriate to call me a psychopath despite having no knowledge of my personality or anything about me other than that I am pro-choice. I've stayed up at night to steer my severely depressed friend away from contemplating suicide; does that sound like the deed of a psychopath? What about when I cried for weeks at the death of my cat? What about all the times I've woken up in the middle of the night to help my little brother recover from severe asthmatic attacks? How about when I spent weeks making an entire book of letters, drawings and memories for part of my girlfriend's Christmas present? I've sent random blog owners anonymous messages saying that I hope they have a good day, purely because I felt like doing something nice to cheer someone up without wanting any credit, and yet you're saying that I'm some twisted monster with no moral compass. I know exactly what you're trying to do - it's much easier to justify an illogical viewpoint if you regard people who disagree as evil or incapable of compassion. I think your views on abortion are dangerous, but I don't think you're an evil person because of that.
    I'm not a Christian... So that means absolutely nothing to me. And also I believe the Old Testament tells you to kill gays.... So obviously with crimes we are to have specific penalties for society's benefit.


    most of what you said was revolved around you.... Like I said psychopathic tendencies Which is the truth for anyone who justifies murder of someone who is known to be innocent.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    white girls piss me off.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SophieSmall)
    Hahaha okay love.
    In an earlier reply you said that murder was literally just "killing someone"

    haha so you think both the woman and foetus should die then? Absolutely laughable.

    First of all it's not a child, so you can stop that. It's a clump of cells microscopic to the naked eye. I'm not adamant on "killing" all foetuses but I strong believe in the option of abortion being there, to prevent back ally abortions and overcrowded orphanages to child abuse from the mothers resentment.
    No murder is premeditated with the intent. Look it up. A fetus is incapable of that.


    I never said both should die. I said I wouldn't do it personally which I have a choice in.

    Yeah it's a child its under 18. It's a kid. And you are a clump of cells as well just bigger.... And the Dna of those cells is genetically human.

    Yes you think murder should be legal for the mother's inconvenience. Kill some humans off because it's overcrowded.

    Very psychopathic. But you already know you're sick so nothing new in that.
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nickierose21)
    I'm not a Christian... So that means absolutely nothing to me. And also I believe the Old Testament tells you to kill gays.... So obviously with crimes we are to have specific penalties for society's benefit.


    I originally didn't call you psychopath until you interjected in a conversation I was having with someone else. And most of what you said was revolved around you.... Like I said psychopathic tendencies Which is the truth for anyone who justifies murder of someone who is known to be innocent.
    I don't believe I did interject. I have no idea what you're trying to say about that Old Testament thing, because I'm not Christian either. Unless you're advocating the death penalty for gay people, which I really hope you're not, because that's far more murderous than abortion.

    Please provide evidence of this "revolving around me" you speak of. And no, defending myself from your ad hominem remarks doesn't count.

    Also, that comment about me "probably being from the UK" is ridiculous. I am my own person, and I'm not going to be influenced by the "backwards thinking" of any country whatsoever, or what that country's "history is all about". You're saying that British history is all about being pro-choice? Oh dear, I guess the UK never existed before 1967. Isaac Newton isn't real, I'm afraid; the foundations of modern physics just completely disappeared down the back of a time paradox! How ironic? Also, Sir Tim Berners-Lee was NOT born in 1955 any more, so we can't be having this debate via the Internet because he didn't invent it!
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nickierose21)
    No murder is premeditated with the intent. Look it up. A fetus is incapable of that.


    I never said both should die. I said I wouldn't do it personally which I have a choice in.

    Yeah it's a child its under 18. It's a kid. And you are a clump of cells as well just bigger.... And the Dna of those cells is genetically human.

    Yes you think murder should be legal for the mother's inconvenience.

    Very psychopathic. But you already know you're sick so nothing new in that.
    Oh my god, I know what murder is :rolleyes: I am simply stated that before you said the definition of murder is just "killing". And since you are now using the legal definition of murder...may I remind you again abortion does not come under the legal definition of murder.

    Well then you ignored my question initially then didn't you. Do you think it should be illegal for a woman to abort if the foetus will likely kill her? yes or no. Simple question but one you seem to be incapable of answering.

    No, it is not a child. It is no more a child than a sperm is a child or a colony of bacteria is a child. It CAN grow into a child, but it is not yet a child.

    It's not murder. Check the legal defintion again. (though of course you are going to say law has nothing to do with it...but then you'll qoute the LEGAL definition of murder. Bit of a brick wall aren't you?

    Lol you just love to call people psychopaths don't you?
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blazar)
    I don't believe I did interject. I have no idea what you're trying to say about that Old Testament thing, because I'm not Christian either. Unless you're advocating the death penalty for gay people, which I really hope you're not, because that's far more murderous than abortion.

    Please provide evidence of this "revolving around me" you speak of. And no, defending myself from your ad hominem remarks doesn't count.

    Also, that comment about me "probably being from the UK" is ridiculous. I am my own person, and I'm not going to be influenced by the "backwards thinking" of any country whatsoever, or what that country's "history is all about". You're saying that British history is all about being pro-choice? Oh dear, I guess the UK never existed before 1967. Isaac Newton isn't real, I'm afraid; the foundations of modern physics just completely disappeared down the back of a time paradox! How ironic? Also, Sir Tim Berners-Lee was NOT born in 1955 any more, so we can't be having this debate via the Internet because he didn't invent it!
    She has the mental capacity of a potato. I'm not even sure why I'm bothering replying to her, All she does is go round in circles and then change her argument.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    No I'm saying that your book does tell your to penalize people for the crimes that's all.

    I don't believe gays should be punished I think that gay marriage is better legal.

    The situations you dimes rubes revolved around you like your cat your friend etc. Egocentricism is apart of aspd.


    (Original post by Blazar)
    I don't believe I did interject. I have no idea what you're trying to say about that Old Testament thing, because I'm not Christian either. Unless you're advocating the death penalty for gay people, which I really hope you're not, because that's far more murderous than abortion.

    Please provide evidence of this "revolving around me" you speak of. And no, defending myself from your ad hominem remarks doesn't count.

    Also, that comment about me "probably being from the UK" is ridiculous. I am my own person, and I'm not going to be influenced by the "backwards thinking" of any country whatsoever, or what that country's "history is all about". You're saying that British history is all about being pro-choice? Oh dear, I guess the UK never existed before 1967. Isaac Newton isn't real, I'm afraid; the foundations of modern physics just completely disappeared down the back of a time paradox! How ironic? Also, Sir Tim Berners-Lee was NOT born in 1955 any more, so we can't be having this debate via the Internet because he didn't invent it!
    No I'm not talking about abortion.

    The uk has a history of being where you what your father is and you are treated the same accordingly.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SophieSmall)
    Oh my god, I know what murder is :rolleyes: I am simply stated that before you said the definition of murder is just "killing". And since you are now using the legal definition of murder...may I remind you again abortion does not come under the legal definition of murder.

    Well then you ignored my question initially then didn't you. Do you think it should be illegal for a woman to abort if the foetus will likely kill her? yes or no. Simple question but one you seem to be incapable of answering.

    No, it is not a child. It is no more a child than a sperm is a child or a colony of bacteria is a child. It CAN grow into a child, but it is not yet a child.

    It's not murder. Check the legal defintion again. (though of course you are going to say law has nothing to do with it...but then you'll qoute the LEGAL definition of murder. Bit of a brick wall aren't you?

    Lol you just love to call people psychopaths don't you?
    May I remind you that killing gays is legal in some places so if abortion is not murder nor is killing gays....

    No sperm is apart of a person. A fetus is an actually person. There's a difference. and yes it's a child its under 18

    Like I said as before if it's legal to kill gays is it no longer murder same stands for abortion....

    What did you think I'd forget what I asked you before?

    Lol not likely.

    I already won this argument why do you need to be this fatuous and go in a circle like this?
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nickierose21)
    No I'm saying that your book does tell your to penalize people for the crimes that's all.

    I don't believe gays should be punished I think that gay marriage is better legal.

    The situations you dimes rubes revolved around you like your cat your friend etc. Egocentricism is apart of aspd.




    No I'm not talking about abortion.

    The uk has a history of being where you what your father is and you are treated the same accordingly.
    Why are you calling it "my book" when I already told you I'm not religious?

    I'm providing evidence of MY empathetic and emotional experiences because you are accusing ME of being a psychopath incapable of experiencing empathy and emotion. Contextually, it wouldn't make much sense for me to talk about how some random celebrity isn't a psychopath, would it?

    I'm not sure you know what a psychopath actually is.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy

    As for the whole British history thing, that is a complete caricature of British society and things haven't been like that for centuries. Of course nepotism still exists in Britain, but then nepotism exists in most, if not all, cultures.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SophieSmall)
    She has the mental capacity of a potato. I'm not even sure why I'm bothering replying to her, All she does is go round in circles and then change her argument.
    No that's actually you. You thought you could go in a circle and then repeat yourself at a claim I already beat you with. I'll be glad to do it again though.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blazar)
    Why are you calling it "my book" when I already told you I'm not religious?

    I'm providing evidence of MY empathetic and emotional experiences because you are accusing ME of being a psychopath incapable of experiencing empathy and emotion. Contextually, it wouldn't make much sense for me to talk about how some random celebrity isn't a psychopath, would it?

    I'm not sure you know what a psychopath actually is.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy

    As for the whole British history thing, that is a complete caricature of British society and things haven't been like that for centuries. Of course nepotism still exists in Britain, but then nepotism exists in most, if not all, cultures.
    Yes but it's in your history.

    You can have psychopathic tendencies without being a psychopath. I'm not saying I actually thought you have aspd just that you are displaying psychopathic tendencies just by justifying killing someone who you know is innocent. They go hand in hand. If you don't like it don't display it.
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SophieSmall)
    She has the mental capacity of a potato. I'm not even sure why I'm bothering replying to her, All she does is go round in circles and then change her argument.
    At least potatoes don't accuse you of being mentally ill.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blazar)
    At least potatoes don't accuse you of being mentally ill.
    You're just going to personal insults because you can't win. And are upset im saying your beliefs are psychopathic.

    At the end of the day that's just what they are. You may be upset but that changes absolutely nothing about what I said.
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nickierose21)
    I'm not saying I actually thought you have aspd
    (Original post by Nickierose21)
    And yes that's all you are proving is that you're a psychopath.
    Contradiction much?
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blazar)
    At least potatoes don't accuse you of being mentally ill.
    That's true, actually now I think about it that was insulting to potatoes. Potatoes are such a great food.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blazar)
    Contradiction much?
    Yeah by explaining you're prochoice you are giving proof that you may be a psychopath. Until given other evidence one could gather that you have some symptoms of it.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nickierose21)
    May I remind you that killing gays is legal in some places so if abortion is not murder nor is killing gays....

    No sperm is apart of a person. A fetus is an actually person. There's a difference. and yes it's a child its under 18

    Like I said as before if it's legal to kill gays is it no longer murder same stands for abortion....

    What did you think I'd forget what I asked you before?

    Lol not likely.

    I already won this argument why do you need to be this fatuous and go in a circle like this?
    This is actually hilarious. I'm screen-shotting this for future laughing material.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SophieSmall)
    That's true, actually now I think about it that was insulting to potatoes. Potatoes are such a great food.
    admitting im right
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nickierose21)
    You're just going to personal insults because you can't win. And are upset im saying your beliefs are psychopathic.

    At the end of the day that's just what they are. You may be upset but that changes absolutely nothing about what I said.
    I didn't insult you personally. I simply stated a fact - vegetables don't call people psychopaths. Are you disputing that? :rolleyes:

    I'm not "upset" that you're calling me a psychopath; I just find it infuriating that you're trivialising mental illness because you can't defend your standpoint without resorting to ad hominem.

    Your argument is based on the assumption that a foetus and a human being are the same thing. I disagree with this assumption as it's some time before a foetus even develops a brain. You seem to think that it's okay for a woman to be forced to bear the child of her rapist, and for women to have fewer rights than literal dead bodies. Perhaps you're the one with psychopathic tendencies.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blazar)
    I didn't insult you personally. I simply stated a fact - vegetables don't call people psychopaths. Are you disputing that? :rolleyes:

    I'm not "upset" that you're calling me a psychopath; I just find it infuriating that you're trivialising mental illness because you can't defend your standpoint without resorting to ad hominem.

    Your argument is based on the assumption that a foetus and a human being are the same thing. I disagree with this assumption as it's some time before a foetus even develops a brain. You seem to think that it's okay for a woman to be forced to bear the child of her rapist, and for women to have fewer rights than literal dead bodies. Perhaps you're the one with psychopathic tendencies.
    Honestly I wouldn't waste your time getting infuriated, it's better to laugh it off. She is in the minority with her view, thankfully we live in a country (I'm assuming now you're from the UK) that isn't completely backwards like the states.
 
 
 
Poll
Do you agree with the PM's proposal to cut tuition fees for some courses?
Useful resources
AtCTs

Ask the Community Team

Got a question about the site content or our moderation? Ask here.

Welcome Lounge

Welcome Lounge

We're a friendly bunch. Post here if you're new to TSR.

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.