I've identified myself as greysexual, ask me anything

Isnt this metrosexual?

Labels can be a big a part of people's identities when they don't fall into what's assumed to be the norm, as I assume you do because you've never really thought this through. It takes a lot of thinking to figure things like this out, and it can help a lot to put a name to things, because it allows you to find other people who are the same or at least similar. Obviously that's not an issue when you're in the majority of a particular group, but it's not like the labels are hurting anyone, are they? They're words. It's like getting upset about their being too many Pantone colours.

Greysexual is so indie/hipster all of a sudden, haven't you heard?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Isnt this metrosexual?

how old are you?

I'd say give it some time, you will grow out of it. It's important that you are social even though you are asexual. i am pretty sure its a phase.

today at waitrose, i saw this man in knee-length coat, beard, thin, long thinning hair, skinny, boots, buying a ton of cats food. man, he is asexual and asocial. he smells. you dont want to be like that.

Not being straight, I certainly don't fall into the 'norm', I just don't feel the need to apply a label to describe every single aspect of my sexual orientation.

It is hurting people, it's making people over categorise themselves to the point where if any tiny thing changes they could have an identity crisis. In the OP it says that they are disgusted by the female body right now, what happens when they're not? (As implied by saying 'right now') do they change their labels?

Isn't there a grey area with having a low sex drive/asexuality? I've been told that I could have low levels of the male sex hormone.

If I do find someone sexually appealing while being in a relationship with her, I would still see myself as a greyseual as I am only finding her sexually appealing becuase I am with her. There's also the chance that I won't find her appealing at all. That's what I am scared of, I know that sex is said to be very important...

Yep that's exactly what I said - if you do want to experience sexuality, there would be no shame in getting tested and trying hormone treatment.

That's demisexual, you don't even understand the labels that you are giving yourself!

Just be with whoesver you want to and stop caring so much about labelling it. Sex isn't everything.

I have no desire currently to want sex, I do however crave/desire/think about cuddles a lot.

Not being straight, I certainly don't fall into the 'norm', I just don't feel the need to apply a label to describe every single aspect of my sexual orientation.

It is hurting people, it's making people over categorise themselves to the point where if any tiny thing changes they could have an identity crisis. In the OP it says that they are disgusted by the female body right now, what happens when they're not? (As implied by saying 'right now') do they change their labels?

Greysexual is an interesting word. I thought it'd mean that you were attracted to elderly people

Another silly, faddy label for people who want to appear "different" and get attention.

This. I don't see difference between greysexuality and asexuality tbh.

Asexuality is lack of sexual attraction, gray-A means you don't normally experience sexual attraction, but do sometimes. Or at least, that's my understanding of the matter.

Okay! Still, sounds just like a person with a low sex-drive. Why 300 labels for same meaning?

Well, sex drive is different to sexuality - people of any orientation can have a low sex drive.

I think OP is a heterosexual with just a low sex-drive. It doesn't mean that when he doesn't want to have sex etc his sexual attraction disappears.

Unless I got this totally wrong...