Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Kraixo)
    so is the distance 0.12 cm or 0.24 cm
    0.118cm is one complete wavelength
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Kraixo)
    so is the distance 0.12 cm or 0.24 cm
    Looking at that time wavelength is 8cm then, I thought is sed the melting was just at the centre
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by HasanRaza1)
    Nah, since there were three antinodes so its one complete wave they showed?
    I thought it looks like something like in this diagram? Could you check if its alright?
    Attached Images
     
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by musslih)
    I thought it looks like something like in this diagram? Could you check if its alright?
    Ah i see what youve done
    Antinodes are places of maximum displacement, so there is an antinode at the max positive AND max negative displacement
    You have missed out the max negative displacment
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by musslih)
    I thought it looks like something like in this diagram? Could you check if its alright?
    the microwave is a max and min amplitude, it doesn't go from rest to max amplitude, it goes from rest, max amplitude, rest, then min amplitude (by min amplitude i mean the max negative amplitude)
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    for the last two questions i got

    Anti Neutron -> Anti Proton + Position(e+) + Electron Neutrino(Ve)
    and Weak interaction
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    markscheme pls
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by HasanRaza1)
    Ah i see what youve done
    Antinodes are places of maximum displacement, so there is an antinode at the max positive AND max negative displacement
    You have missed out the max negative displacment
    OH! now i know! alright thanks! I just thought the antinodes in this case was the maximum positive displacement, but is there an explanation for why the maximum negative displacement also melted the chocolate?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    https://youtu.be/3HZIrJtA6jc In case anyone wanted it i made one.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Someone make a unofficial markscheme please
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by musslih)
    OH! now i know! alright thanks! I just thought the antinodes in this case was the maximum positive displacement, but is there an explanation for why the maximum negative displacement also melted the chocolate?
    No worries
    Antinodes are, by definition, points of maximum displacement on the wave
    It doesnt matter if its positive or negative, the particles move/vibrate the same distance so it will warm up regardless
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 83457)
    what did you guys put for percentage change of diameter? i put 3%, but i think it was 20%
    its 0.8%, i put numbers in it and stuff, took me bloody 5 minutes :P
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 123chem)
    its 0.8%, i put numbers in it and stuff, took me bloody 5 minutes :P
    I've got the same answer! Yes it took a long time going through the equation again, then finding the % change
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Did people use newton's first law or third? Used first one here
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 123chem)
    Did people use newton's first law or third? Used first one here

    I used the third law as the engine exerts a force on the air hence the air produces an equal opposite force in the direction of motion.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BiopredatorZz)
    for the last two questions i got

    Anti Neutron -> Anti Proton + Position(e+) + Electron Neutrino(Ve)
    and Weak interaction
    Yep what I got
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by chrisdale98)
    Oh god no i did that too
    I am pretty sure that as it is deceleration it is 2.71. That means it was accelerating at -2.71.

    If you said the deceleration was -2.71, that would mean it is actually accelerating and so it would be speeding up not coming to a halt.

    So 2.71 would be correct do not worry
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Akashi)
    I used the third law as the engine exerts a force on the air hence the air produces an equal opposite force in the direction of motion.
    Yep I put that and I also used the second law and said the rate of change of momentum was equal to the force exerted.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Akashi)
    I used the third law as the engine exerts a force on the air hence the air produces an equal opposite force in the direction of motion.
    I used second and third just to be safe!

    Engine exerts a force on air so air exerts a force on engine.
    Air is accelerated as it passes through the engine so can also use f=ma
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by aipomaniac)
    I used second and third just to be safe!

    Engine exerts a force on air so air exerts a force on engine.
    Air is accelerated as it passes through the engine so can also use f=ma
    How many marks was that question
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Has a teacher ever helped you cheat?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Write a reply...
    Reply
    Hide
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.