You are Here: Home >< Maths

# The Proof is Trivial! Watch

1. Solution 223

Clearly, .
Solution 222

Clearly, .
****s sake, you're too fast! I'm wondering if there is a way to do it without Cauchy Schwartz...

Oh and, btw, do you know how the Engel form is derived?

Edit: Btw henpen, I didn't think this was too boring or easy, the result is rather nice!
3. (Original post by Jkn)
Spoiler:
Show
****s sake, you're too fast! I'm wondering if there is a way to do it without Cauchy Schwartz...

Oh and, btw, do you know how the Engel form is derived?

Edit: Btw henpen, I didn't think this was too boring or easy, the result is rather nice!
From C-S, .
From C-S, .
You have a nice way of making things seem so easy

I'm such a fan of it now! It trivialises so many things!
5. How about the form in Theorem 4.3? Engel form's easy enough to derive, but that form seems very far removed from the vanilla CS.
6. (Original post by henpen)
How about the form in Theorem 4.3? Engel form's easy enough to derive, but that form seems very far removed from the vanilla CS.
Induction.
Problem 221**

Find all which satisfy .
Solution 221

When x=0, .

Hence, for ,

For , when y=0, . Letting and equating the two equations gives which we know also works when x=0, by assumption.

Letting y=-x gives . In the case where f(0)=0, and using the equations just derived, this reduces to which also works for f(x)=0.

, and are the only functions that satisfy the given functional equation.

(maybe I should start doing functional equations questions. I've always avoided them for some reason...)
8. I'm waiting for the mechanics
9. (Original post by bananarama2)
I'm waiting for the mechanics
Mechanics? Can't give you something that easy... here's a problem that takes place in a non-mathematical world:

Problem 223*

A spherical ball is dropped from the Eiffel Tower from rest. Give a convincing argument as to why Olber's Paradox gives strong evidence to support the idea that the observable universe has existed for a finite period of time. Note that, for such an argument to be convincing, it must rely solely on assumptions that are supported by strong evidence. In this question you are required to quote primary data sources to support all assumptions made.
10. Solution 221

The inequality reduces to:

This is easily shown using CS:

11. (Original post by Jkn)

Letting y=-x gives . In the case where f(0)=0, and using the equations just derived, this reduces to which also works when f(x)=0, by assumption.
I do not understand this. From it does not follow that for all or for all . Can I not take to be zero over the rationals and over the irrationals?
12. (Original post by Jkn)
...
I've decided to give you a taste of what I do

Problem 224*/**:

Whenever we say "function" we mean total function.

Denote for every the set .

The mystery concept of a strange product for two such sets and satisfies the following property:

There exist functions and such that:

For each and each pair of functions and there exists a unique function such that for all we have and

Show that regardless of what the exact definition for is, if it satisfies the above property then for all sets and (non-zero) natural , iff (in other words ).

EDIT1: made it clearer, but question is still the same.

EDIT2: Hmmm I just realised that the elegant solution is far beyond *-level, and the inelegant one may be quite long.

EDIT3: Actually for the above reason I'm going to withdraw it as a formal problem for this thread, but it's open to anyone who wants to try it.
13. (Original post by ukdragon37)
]

EDIT1: made it clearer, but question is still the same.
Yeh. You just elucidated the whole problem
14. (Original post by ukdragon37)
I've decided to give you a taste of what I do

EDIT1: made it clearer, but question is still the same.

EDIT2: Hmmm I just realised that the elegant solution is far beyond *-level, and the inelegant one may be quite long.

EDIT3: Actually for the above reason I'm going to withdraw it as a formal problem for this thread, but it's open to anyone who wants to try it.
I must say I was shamelessly looking up most of the notation, and was wondering how I was meant to solve it
15. (Original post by bananarama2)
Yeh. You just elucidated the whole problem
It's a royal pain writing out the question with a concrete example and in words. Normally you would express the property as a diagram:

16. (Original post by joostan)
I must say I was shamelessly looking up most of the notation, and was wondering how I was meant to solve it
Nah don't worry about it. Once again I posed a problem that requires too much definitions to understand.
17. (Original post by ukdragon37)
It's a royal pain writing out the question with a concrete example and in words. Normally you would express the property as a diagram:

My mind just can't plough through that question I'm sure someone else will have a go. I think I'll choose Matsci. over Compsci.
18. (Original post by ukdragon37)
Nah don't worry about it. Once again I posed a problem that requires too much definitions to understand.
Haha, it looks pretty
19. (Original post by joostan)
Haha, it looks pretty
My thoughts exactly for most of the solutions...
20. (Original post by ukdragon37)
...
So how many kids do you have?

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: January 5, 2018
Today on TSR

### Should I ask for his number?

Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Discussions on TSR

• Latest
• ## See more of what you like on The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

• The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE