Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Johnson and Scott devised the actual field experiment. However, Loftus et al used eye tracking to kind of extended this research.

    I personally wrote Loftus et al so hopefully, no/minimal marks are lost.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by yoiamyoyo)
    For anxiety on EWT, I wrote about Loftus et al's eapon focus effect as the 6 marker. But when I read the following question, I read it as "Give limitation of research into anxtiey of EWT"
    I wrote about ethical issues due to most real-life anxiety studies.
    Should I have written a limitation on MY given study?
    I wrote that as well
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by emmacls12)
    I just realised my textbook is wrong and said loftus did the weapon focus effect. I described the study in detail but I used the wrong name, will I now not get any marks for this question?
    You don't get any marks for naming the researcher anyway
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    Are the grade boundaries everyone is taking about just for one paper or would that have to be your overall mark. E.g to get 60 for an A, your two papers total up to this? Or do you need 60 on just paper 1?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by misscody123)
    Does the Minnesota and McCarthy case study count when evaluating Bowlby? Please answer, thanks
    Yep! As long as you linked them back to parts of Bowlby's theory then those are good ones to use
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by hanewie123)
    Are the grade boundaries everyone is taking about just for one paper or would that have to be your overall mark. E.g to get 60 for an A, your two papers total up to this? Or do you need 60 on just paper 1?
    Yup, normally its 60/72 for unit 1
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    So is this a valid limitation of research on anxiety

    Ethical issues need to be considered such as protection of participants due to stressful situations because of the presence of a weapon may cause distress

    Also for you who are asking for the directional hypothesis the correct answer is THERE WILL BE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE words recalled using memory strategy improvements than not that would get 2 marks

    Also a limitation of the multi store model i wrote that the model is over complicated or over simplified as it is more complicated than what it needs to be such as the features and the movement of the memory would that get me 2 marks
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    I think we need to stop talking about it guys what's done is done. Shift the concentration to unit 2 and your other exams
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by saran12)
    I think we need to stop talking about it guys what's done is done. Shift the concentration to unit 2 and your other exams
    I agree. Does anyone have any predictions on the 12 marker in unit 2?
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by nobodycarescarla)
    Yup, normally its 60/72 for unit 1
    this isn't true. I've looked at the boundaries for the past few years and the highest I saw was 57/72 :/
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Micxael)
    You don't get any marks for naming the researcher anyway
    So I'll still get the marks?
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    I know I'm late, should've asked yesterday but can someone just help me out. Yesterday during this exam, I felt as though my hands weren't working properly. I couldn't even hold the pen straight and it felt as though it was taking me absolute ages to write (I spent 20 minutes on the first page just writing about the msm which is not normal). I changed pens constantly, was feeling extremely fidgety and my hands were sweating badly.. It's never happened to me before so is this normal? Also to add I didn't finish my 12 marker, I was just about to start ao2 when we had 5 minutes left and I wrote 3 sentences in these 5 minutes, so thats 6 marks defo down the drain
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    Okay few questions and then I will shut up and focus on unit 2...


    Would it be okay if for the 12 marker i wrote;
    Bowlbys theory (including monotropy, internal working model, critical period etc) then supported him with Lorenz's study with the geese and imprinting saying it supports critical period and then criticised him with Genie who was able to reverse the effects of not forming an attachment when Bowbly said it was 'irreversibly broken?' And then evaluated the case study?
    I didn't evaluate bowlby as I couldn't think of anything. Scared now because I don't think this got enough marks. Can anyone make a guess?


    Also, for the anxiety question I wrote about Clifford and Scott showing the 2 videos, one violent and one non violent, I feel like no one else has put this:/... and then said about weapon focus. Is this okay?

    Thank you!
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    My psychology teacher just told me, that as long as the study was written correctly you don't have to have the right name
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    That was a different question... there was also a 4 marker on the strengths/ weaknesses of case studies, as well as, one on pilot studies (which I'm pretty sure was either a 4 or 6 marker)...

    What you put was right tho, I did the same here.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SunDun111)
    Guys I reckon I got a B in this test now I reckon I can get a B overall however I still haven't learned conformity and abnormality, I've done stress almost. Is it possible to learn these two in under a week?
    I really need to revise Unit 2, I'm okay on Conformity, done a little bit of stress, but I'm just going to do solid Unit 2 revision this weekend and hope for the best...
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by stillsoul)
    For the operationalised directional hypothesis question I put "Those who use a memory strategy will recall more words than those who do not use a memory strategy". How many marks of the two would I get for that?
    That is what I wrote, I didn't specify the specific memory improvement strategy either...

    Do you think we can still get 2 marks or not?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jimmy_G123)
    For the 12 marker for A02 i used the study of Hodges and Tizard for a study against the concept of Bowlbys Critical period, is this correct and will i get marks for it?!?!?!!?

    Yeah i wrote about Hodges and Tizard too except the study they conducted SUPPORTED the critical period????
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by victoria1998)
    That is what I wrote, I didn't specify the specific memory improvement strategy either...

    Do you think we can still get 2 marks or not?
    I did this as well but didn't specify which strategy :/
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Guys has anyone got a Dropbox or something to the actual paper or an unofficial mark scheme yet?
 
 
 
Poll
Do you agree with the PM's proposal to cut tuition fees for some courses?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.