To what extent? Would you reverse the decision in R v Brown, or would that type of sexual freedom/expression still not be covered by consent?(Original post by TitanCream)
I would be interested in adding a clause that allows for sexual freedom and expression.
x
Turn on thread page Beta
-
Mactotaur
- Follow
- 19 followers
- 14 badges
- Send a private message to Mactotaur
Offline14ReputationRep:- Follow
- 161
- 27-04-2016 16:23
-
banterboy
- Follow
- 6 followers
- 13 badges
- Send a private message to banterboy
Offline13ReputationRep:- Follow
- 162
- 27-04-2016 17:02
(Original post by Kay_Winters)
Are you trying to suggest republicans shouldn't "hate" the monarchy just because the royals do charity work? As for charity actually, our former PM had a few things to say on charity
Attachment 526287
I am glad to see this will be the case, and I must say I was relieved it was you out of all the liberals, conservatives and the nat lib to take on health.
Nah charity isn't a bad thing, unfairly high taxes for the rich is though. -
Aph
- Follow
- 118 followers
- 22 badges
- Send a private message to Aph
- Very Important Poster
Online22ReputationRep:Very Important Poster- Follow
- 163
- 27-04-2016 18:42
(Original post by banterboy)
Actually all i was saying is that nothing is gonna stop republicans hating the monarchy.
Nah charity isn't a bad thing, unfairly high taxes for the rich is though.
Charity is bad because it's an ego trip. People feel good about giving a little money to charity and rich people use charity as an opportunity for a photo shoot. Generally I serverly dislike charity and think it doesn't serve a function most of the time.
Either what they are doing should be state funded (air ambulance) or it shouldn't happen. -
banterboy
- Follow
- 6 followers
- 13 badges
- Send a private message to banterboy
Offline13ReputationRep:- Follow
- 164
- 27-04-2016 18:50
(Original post by Aph)
Not such thing as unfairly high taxes. If we didn't have income tax people wouldn't get paid as much as they do because of it. I veiw income tax as a tax on businesses more then anything. Also the rich owe society for their wealth and they make money on the backs of the poor so they should give that money away.
Charity is bad because it's an ego trip. People feel good about giving a little money to charity and rich people use charity as an opportunity for a photo shoot. Generally I serverly dislike charity and think it doesn't serve a function most of the time.
Either what they are doing should be state funded (air ambulance) or it shouldn't happen.
SO if we stopped charity x more people would die than necessary. That's a good thing because "charity is an ego boost"? -
Aph
- Follow
- 118 followers
- 22 badges
- Send a private message to Aph
- Very Important Poster
Online22ReputationRep:Very Important Poster- Follow
- 165
- 27-04-2016 18:58
(Original post by banterboy)
It's the other way around. They make money off the backs of their own businesses, and workers gain from the jobs those businesses provide.
SO if we stopped charity x more people would die than necessary. That's a good thing because "charity is an ego boost"?
The rich generally get lucky. Indeed there isn't a single people who didn't get rich though some form of luck.
Charity is an ego boosting facist cult. And no people wouldn't die because if it's genuinely important the government should fund it and not rely on private citizens doing it. -
- Follow
- 166
- 27-04-2016 19:06
Can we have a sensible, calm discussion about anarcho-communism and its pros and cons?
What do you think about anarchism and do you think it would be possible for a society to maintain itself without the need of hierarchy? -
banterboy
- Follow
- 6 followers
- 13 badges
- Send a private message to banterboy
Offline13ReputationRep:- Follow
- 167
- 27-04-2016 19:18
(Original post by Aph)
I disagree. People who win need people to loose, people who loose don't need people to win.
The rich generally get lucky. Indeed there isn't a single people who didn't get rich though some form of luck.
Charity is an ego boosting facist cult. And no people wouldn't die because if it's genuinely important the government should fund it and not rely on private citizens doing it. -
Aph
- Follow
- 118 followers
- 22 badges
- Send a private message to Aph
- Very Important Poster
Online22ReputationRep:Very Important Poster- Follow
- 168
- 27-04-2016 19:24
(Original post by banterboy)
I am constantly astounded that you have chosen the liberal party.
And that isn't an answer to my responce. -
TheDefiniteArticle
- Follow
- 42 followers
- 20 badges
- Send a private message to TheDefiniteArticle
Online20ReputationRep:- Follow
- 169
- 27-04-2016 20:04
(Original post by Aph)
I disagree. People who win need people to loose, people who loose don't need people to win.
The rich generally get lucky. Indeed there isn't a single people who didn't get rich though some form of luck.
Charity is an ego boosting facist cult. And no people wouldn't die because if it's genuinely important the government should fund it and not rely on private citizens doing it.
(Original post by banterboy)
I am constantly astounded that you have chosen the liberal party.
#aphtheliberal -
banterboy
- Follow
- 6 followers
- 13 badges
- Send a private message to banterboy
Offline13ReputationRep:- Follow
- 170
- 27-04-2016 20:05
(Original post by Aph)
I care more about society and social policy then economic policy.
And that isn't an answer to my responce.
And i just cba, you've said so many things there that just fly in the face of common sense. i think it is therefore up to you to prove them if you wish. -
Aph
- Follow
- 118 followers
- 22 badges
- Send a private message to Aph
- Very Important Poster
Online22ReputationRep:Very Important Poster- Follow
- 171
- 27-04-2016 20:43
(Original post by banterboy)
so not allowing people to donate money to whatever cause they wish is not an anti liberal social policy?
And i just cba, you've said so many things there that just fly in the face of common sense. i think it is therefore up to you to prove them if you wish.
Common sense is subjective... -
That Bearded Man
- Follow
- 40 followers
- 22 badges
- Send a private message to That Bearded Man
Offline22ReputationRep:- Follow
- 172
- 27-04-2016 21:53
(Original post by banterboy)
so not allowing people to donate money to whatever cause they wish is not an anti liberal social policy?
And i just cba, you've said so many things there that just fly in the face of common sense. i think it is therefore up to you to prove them if you wish. -
TitanCream
- Follow
- 20 followers
- 20 badges
- Send a private message to TitanCream
Offline20ReputationRep:- Follow
- 173
- 27-04-2016 23:15
(Original post by Mactotaur)
To what extent? Would you reverse the decision in R v Brown, or would that type of sexual freedom/expression still not be covered by consent? -
TheDefiniteArticle
- Follow
- 42 followers
- 20 badges
- Send a private message to TheDefiniteArticle
Online20ReputationRep:- Follow
- 174
- 28-04-2016 00:06
(Original post by TitanCream)
Well I believe in Mills harm principle, and I think in that case if those involved agreed and accepted what was happening then the state had no right to intervene. Especially with certain parties out there we need to protect sexual expression. -
- Follow
- 175
- 28-04-2016 00:24
(Original post by higure)
Can we have a sensible, calm discussion about anarcho-communism and its pros and cons?
What do you think about anarchism and do you think it would be possible for a society to maintain itself without the need of hierarchy? -
Jammy Duel
- Follow
- 49 followers
- 21 badges
- Send a private message to Jammy Duel
- Political Ambassador
Online21ReputationRep:Political Ambassador- Follow
- 176
- 28-04-2016 00:45
(Original post by higure)
Can we have a sensible, calm discussion about anarcho-communism and its pros and cons?
What do you think about anarchism and do you think it would be possible for a society to maintain itself without the need of hierarchy?
Posted from TSR Mobile -
Hazzer1998
- Follow
- 31 followers
- 21 badges
- Send a private message to Hazzer1998
- Political Ambassador
Offline21ReputationRep:Political Ambassador- Follow
- 177
- 30-04-2016 21:09
Can we expect any government legislation soon ?
Oh and is your Home Secretary active ? -
- Follow
- 178
- 30-04-2016 21:13
(Original post by hazzer1998)
Can we expect any government legislation soon ?
Oh and is your Home Secretary active ? -
- Follow
- 179
- 30-04-2016 21:14
(Original post by hazzer1998)
Can we expect any government legislation soon ?
Oh and is your Home Secretary active ?
Posted from TSR Mobile -
Hazzer1998
- Follow
- 31 followers
- 21 badges
- Send a private message to Hazzer1998
- Political Ambassador
Offline21ReputationRep:Political Ambassador- Follow
- 180
- 30-04-2016 21:18
I thought for a second you were a indie
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
This forum is supported by:
Updated: October 27, 2016
Share this discussion:
Tweet