Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

150,000 Polish Nationalists march against Muslim immigration. watch

    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    You assumed I was talking about WW1
    Explicitly wrote the opposite. Faillllllllllllllllll

    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    Its more using Russian tactics, after all, with out them the Germans would not have been defeated.

    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    Sorry mate, wrong war. That is WW2
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    Explicitly wrote the opposite. Faillllllllllllllllll
    The posts that you quoting are talking about two different subjects, you are muddling them up.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    The posts that you quoting are talking about two different subjects, you are muddling them up.
    Errr na. They are both about WW2.


    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    Its more using Russian tactics, after all, with out them the Germans would not have been defeated.

    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    Sorry mate, wrong war. That is WW2
    Not my issue if you can't be bothered to read. .
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    Errr na. They are both about WW2.







    Not my issue if you can't be bothered to read. .
    No, I was talking about a different time period, and you assumed (like you like to do) that I was talking about the wrong time period.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    No, I was talking about a different time period, and you assumed (like you like to do) that I was talking about the wrong time period.


    Err na. I wrote WW2. Sorry, you can't read.

    Difference is that I provide evidence. You provide zippo.

    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    Its more using Russian tactics, after all, with out them the Germans would not have been defeated.

    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    Sorry mate, wrong war. That is WW2
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    Err na. I wrote WW2. Sorry, you can't read.

    Difference is that I provide evidence. You provide zippo.
    No, in the message that I talk about Russia assisting in winning the war, I never stated WW1, go ahead and see.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    No, in the message that I talk about Russia assisting in winning the war, I never stated WW1, go ahead and see.
    I didn't say you stated WW1. You were obviously talking about WW2.

    ERmmm that is why I wrote WW2. I don't know what is so hard to understand.
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    I didn't say you stated WW1. You were obviously talking about WW2.

    ERmmm that is why I wrote WW2. I don't know what is so hard to understand.
    You said I was talking about WW1, when I was talking about WW2.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    You said I was talking about WW1, when I was talking about WW2.
    Yeh, only in your world would that make sense.

    I just said you were not talking WW1. I wrote before "Sorry mate, wrong war. That is WW2"

    But in your head = He said I was talking about WW1.
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    Yeh, only in your world would that make sense.

    I just said you were not talking WW1. I wrote before "Sorry mate, wrong war. That is WW2"

    But in your head = He said I was talking about WW1.
    You said "Sorry mate, wrong war. That is WW2", when I was already talking about WW2.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    You said "Sorry mate, wrong war. That is WW2", when I was already talking about WW2.
    Sorry, I said it was WW2, when it was already WW2? Well, yeh.

    I said wrong war because you want to use WW1 tactics not WW2 tactics.

    That is why I wrote

    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    Sorry mate, wrong war. That is WW2.

    You wanted to use outdated WW1 tactics..
    Maybe you should read the entire thing and stop making aaaaaaaaaassssssumptions ( like you say).
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    Sorry, I said it was WW2, when it was already WW2? Well, yeh.

    I said wrong war because you want to use WW1 tactics not WW2 tactics.

    That is why I wrote



    Maybe you should read the entire thing and stop making aaaaaaaaaassssssumptions ( like you say).
    Nope, the tactics were based on WW2, and I was talking about WW2, then you said that I was talking about WW1 (which I wasnt) and I meant to talk about WW2.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    you said that I was talking about WW1
    ...

    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    You said "Sorry mate, wrong war. That is WW2".
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    ...
    You are providing evidence for your own assumption.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    You are providing evidence for your own assumption.
    I didn't write any of those statements. You did.
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    I didn't write any of those statements. You did.
    Them statements back my side of the discussion.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    Them statements back my side of the discussion.
    Nope. Quite clearly write

    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    You said "Sorry mate, wrong war. That is WW2""
    Should stop contradicting yourself.

    That is why I can provide evidence, you have none.

    I can't be saying it is WW1, when I say that is WW2.
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    Nope. Quite clearly write



    Should stop contradicting yourself.

    That is why I can provide evidence, you have none.

    I can't be saying it is WW1, when I say that is WW2.
    You said that I was referring to WW2, when I never said that I wasn't referring to WW2.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    You said that I was referring to WW2, when I never said that I wasn't referring to WW2.
    Previously:

    (Original post by The_Opinion)
    you said, that I was talking about WW1,
    Which one is it? WW1 or WW2 or WW3.

    In b4, you claim I said you were talking about WW3.
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DorianGrayism)
    Previously:



    Which one is it? WW1 or WW2 or WW3.

    In b4, you claim I said you were talking about WW3.
    Two different topics, don't conflate them.
 
 
 
Poll
Do you agree with the PM's proposal to cut tuition fees for some courses?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.