Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Townart)
    What did people put for the message question about the cavemen?
    I sed the explicit meaning is that women shuld stay home and talked bout private sphere and public sphere etc.

    Implicit meaning the cartoonist is critiscing those against the votes as it says "prehistoric" so it is seen as an old ideology. The source is FOR the votes.

    For my knowledge i talked bout suffragettes etc 1910-1913 violence etc
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ellamoon_22)
    I sed the explicit meaning is that women shuld stay home and talked bout private sphere and public sphere etc.

    Implicit meaning the cartoonist is critiscing those against the votes as it says "prehistoric" so it is seen as an old ideology. The source is FOR the votes.

    For my knowledge i talked bout suffragettes etc 1910-1913 violence etc
    Yh I put that the idea that women should just stay at home is outdated.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by hereiseverything)
    I put that it was for the vote, because the argument is outdated I think you could have put against though if you said it was tradition. It didn't say who published it so I think it's up to your own interpretation as long as you backed it up
    I put the same as you, about the argument being old and how it lacks reasoning behind it. Let's hope we are right.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Hey do you think I'll loose marks for interpreting the caveman source the other way, like saying it was anti suffrage as it showed tradition and that there'd always be two separate spheres for a man and woman so these should remain. Really worried as nobody else said this so I think I'm wrong and I'll get no marks😕
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Libby56)
    Hey do you think I'll loose marks for interpreting the caveman source the other way, like saying it was anti suffrage as it showed tradition and that there'd always be two separate spheres for a man and woman so these should remain. Really worried as nobody else said this so I think I'm wrong and I'll get no marks😕
    U always get marks for the explicit meaning which is level 3/4

    The in depth/higher meanig is level 5/6

    So yes you will get marks
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Libby56)
    Hey do you think I'll loose marks for interpreting the caveman source the other way, like saying it was anti suffrage as it showed tradition and that there'd always be two separate spheres for a man and woman so these should remain. Really worried as nobody else said this so I think I'm wrong and I'll get no marks😕
    Same- that's what I put too! Glad I've found someone else who did this too. I really worried 😧
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    For question E, would you say it was in favour of women's suffrage, because it shows the flaws in the opponents argument that they, "don't fight in wars"?
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ellamoon_22)
    U always get marks for the explicit meaning which is level 3/4

    The in depth/higher meanig is level 5/6

    So yes you will get marks
    How many marks is level 3/4 because I did this as well whoopsy. It's so irritating because I literally see it so clearly now . Oh well... also what do you think will be the grade boundaries?
    Offline

    1
    (Original post by Townart)
    For question E, would you say it was in favour of women's suffrage, because it shows the flaws in the opponents argument that they, "don't fight in wars"?
    i said that the last source was for women's suffrage. I thought the ideas it showed were mocking and quite ironic. then I spoke about the land army and how women contributed a lo to the war
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by leopard923)
    How many marks is level 3/4 because I did this as well whoopsy. It's so irritating because I literally see it so clearly now . Oh well... also what do you think will be the grade boundaries?
    How many marks was tbe source
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ojmorgs)
    i said that the last source was for women's suffrage. I thought the ideas it showed were mocking and quite ironic. then I spoke about the land army and how women contributed a lo to the war
    Same (not the land army part tho) i just sed they helped etc etc details
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    ____
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Townart)
    For question E, would you say it was in favour of women's suffrage, because it shows the flaws in the opponents argument that they, "don't fight in wars"?
    yes and after that it said that age old lie
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    guys, what did you get for the similarities between the propaganda poster and the other one?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ChickenFillet2.0)
    I walked out of the exam with the question paper? Is that like bad.... Have I broken any rules. What should I do with the paper?
    Lol how even.....no they dont know u have it the exam is over so they cant really do anything
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by XherdanXhaka)
    guys, what did you get for the similarities between the propaganda poster and the other one?
    I put about the type of source- ones a poster the other a speech.
    I put that they both are against votes for women.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Townart)
    For question E, would you say it was in favour of women's suffrage, because it shows the flaws in the opponents argument that they, "don't fight in wars"?
    I said it was against women's vote even though they contributed to the war effort.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Hiorns158)
    I put about the type of source- ones a poster the other a speech.
    I put that they both are against votes for women.
    Yeah, I think they are against too but I think they were unsimilar too because they were against for slightly different reasons? And how about the 'why it has been published' source?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Similar;- both against votes
    -propaganda
    -present women negatively

    Different: -political propaganda vs poster the 1st wants to prevent them voting conservative (selfish gain)
    Parliament vs organisation?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    what did you put for Q5, about protecting women? Like wth...?
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What's your favourite Christmas sweets?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.