Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    Core 1 acts as the basis to Core 2, 3 and 4 so yes, you do.

    Alternatively, you can complete the square to find the minimum point of that quadratic.
    You can also find the maximum point using completing the square right?

    (Original post by RDKGames)
    Took them on my iphone, uploaded them to my computer. They are JPG format.
    Just use tinypic or Imageshack lol.
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by Chittesh14)
    You can also find the maximum point using completing the square right?
    Yes.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    Yes.
    How is this an example of the change of base rule in logarithms. I never understood this rule, but yeah...
    Attached Images
     
    Online

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Chittesh14)
    How is this an example of the change of base rule in logarithms. I never understood this rule, but yeah...
    They changed the base of the logarithm from x to 5, hence the "change of base" name.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    They changed the base of the logarithm from x to 5, hence the "change of base" name.
    Hmm.. Yeah. I understood it in a different way but yeh xD.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    They changed the base of the logarithm from x to 5, hence the "change of base" name.
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    Yes.
    Is there an easier way of solving this equation. The first line of the picture is the equation.
    Attached Images
     
    Online

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Chittesh14)
    Is there an easier way of solving this equation. The first line of the picture is the equation.
    Yeah.

    \log_4 x = \frac{\log_2 x}{\log_2 4} = \frac{\log_2 x}{2}.

    So your equation is just \frac{3}{2} \log_2 x = 2 \iff \log_2 x = \frac{4}{3} \iff x = 2^{4/3}
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    Yeah.

    \log_4 x = \frac{\log_2 x}{\log_2 4} = \frac{\log_2 x}{2}.

    So your equation is just \frac{3}{2} \log_2 x = 2 \iff \log_2 x = \frac{4}{3} \iff x = 2^{4/3}
    Wow. Thanks lol


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Not sure why you even bothered with base 10, seems long winded, just use the example previously. You can use Zacken's method but I'm unsure if that rule is taught at C2, and if it is, you should try to use a base that will make the equation flow better, ie base 2 because it flows nicely with the 2 on the other side. Too tired to explain it mathematically :P

    Name:  ImageUploadedByStudent Room1467502982.371851.jpg
Views: 60
Size:  136.9 KB


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Online

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    ie base 2 because it flows nicely with the 2 on the other side. Too tired to explain it mathematically :P

    No, that's not why you'd use base 2. You'd still convert all logarithms to base 2 if you had \log_4 x + \log_2 x = a for any a\in \mathbb{R}.
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by Zacken)
    No, that's not why you'd use base 2. You'd still convert all logarithms to base 2 if you had \log_4 x + \log_2 x = a for any a\in \mathbb{R}.
    I didn't look into this much last night, but you can use any arbitrary base. Sure, the answer may not look as nice without base 2 but you would still get a correct answer. So surely base 2 is just to make things simpler?

    Just re-read my previous comment, yeah it isn't the exact reason as it's completely independent of any logs.
    Online

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    I didn't look into this much last night, but you can use any arbitrary base. Sure, the answer may not look as nice without base 2 but you would still get a correct answer. So surely base 2 is just to make things simpler?

    Just re-read my previous comment, yeah it isn't the exact reason as it's completely independent of any logs.
    Yes, it's to make things simpler. But it's not because "of the 2 on the other side of the equals sign" as you claim. It would be just as simple if there was a on the other side of the equals sign.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Lol why do you lot argue over Maths . I get confused as I don't know what's going on.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by Chittesh14)
    Lol why do you lot argue over Maths . I get confused as I don't know what's going on.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    We're not arguing. I'm just getting something cleared up. If I wanted to argue I'd go to the Brexit threads.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Lol Ik you lot are not arguing. Maybe, it's just the way you lot speak lol - blunt.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by Chittesh14)
    Lol Ik you lot are not arguing. Maybe, it's just the way you lot speak lol - blunt.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    You are up far too early
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by Chittesh14)
    Lol Ik you lot are not arguing. Maybe, it's just the way you lot speak lol - blunt.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Good, clears things up faster. Nothing wrong with being blunt when talking about maths; you're either right or wrong.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SeanFM)
    You are up far too early
    Work experience bro. Lol.. I wake up at 2 pm usually


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    Good, clears things up faster. Nothing wrong with being blunt when talking about maths; you're either right or wrong.
    Fair enough.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    x
    (Original post by Zacken)
    x
    (Original post by SeanFM)
    x
    Is my answer right in terms of explanation or have I blundered somewhere.
    The answer is 3 I got that .

    Name:  image.jpeg
Views: 86
Size:  40.3 KB
    Attached Images
     
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: July 21, 2016
Poll
Do I go to The Streets tomorrow night?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.