Going to university at 15 will give him the chance to further his mathematical knowledge by giving him access to tutors he would not otherwise be able to see.
He could benefit from the tutors aged 18 equally well and would also find it easier to adapt to university life and form friendships and interact with others. There seems little point in sending a 15 year old to university when they could go at 18.
I would've got a 3 without it... virtually all of my complete answers came out in a mad five minute rush. I sat and panicked for the remaining 2 3/4 hours.
Incidentally my favourite question was II 2009 Q2, I laughed aloud when I got the final result out without a hitch.
I don't really understand what you're trying to say. The questions are easy, but you weren't able to get the solution...
The whole point of STEP is that it is non algorithmic. Calculators can do algorithmic maths. They can solve quadratics, etc. This is also largely what A level maths involves. However STEP is completely different, you have to think about questions and come up with novel solutions. Calculators can't do that.
Sorry guys but if you actually look at the statistical evidence, intelligence is highly heritable.
People aren't born equal, and mathematics says so. Come on, no shocker really. Our brains are built by our genes and genes vary between people. You think mentally retarded people had the same potential as others? No, of course not. And as intelligence is a continuous variable, the same principle applies to everybody else.
Now please abandon this idealistic egalitarian society thing, Labour are still trying it and it fails even harder each year.
thats absolute crap. my parents achieved diddl squat academically however they did know what was needed to allow me to be great academically. there is very little deviation in the intelligence potential or whatever you wantto call it between you and me and everybody on this planet. how comes we are 98% similar genetically to monkeys? mentally retarded people are biologically seperable and not included. labour ftw
thats absolute crap. my parents achieved diddl squat academically however they did know what was needed to allow me to be great academically. there is very little deviation in the intelligence potential or whatever you wantto call it between you and me and everybody on this planet. how comes we are 98% similar genetically to monkeys? mentally retarded people are biologically seperable and not included. labour ftw
That's not how genetics works - the reason we are 93% similar to monkeys (98% to chimpanzees) is because the genes which code for bones, skin, blood etc. are broadly same, with only minuscule modifications, but those modifications make a big difference.
Imagine an instruction for baking a cake:
300 g flour 10 g yeast 50 g butter 100 g sugar
And then for baking waffles:
300 g flour 5 g yeast 35g butter 100 sugar
The instructions are incredibly similar, but the outcome is very different.
Getting a place at such a young age is an amazing achievement. Also, to the people discussing his social development - maybe he doesn't care? Or maybe it's a small price to pay, compared to not going to uni until he's 17/18 and being bored in the meantime.
thats absolute crap. my parents achieved diddl squat academically however they did know what was needed to allow me to be great academically. there is very little deviation in the intelligence potential or whatever you wantto call it between you and me and everybody on this planet. how comes we are 98% similar genetically to monkeys? mentally retarded people are biologically seperable and not included. labour ftw
"Larsson believes by flipping certain genetic levers during a chicken embryo's development, he can reproduce the dinosaur anatomy, he told AFP in an interview." Chickens and dinosaurs therefore have very similar DNA. However, their size, skin and strength vary wildly.
pretty hard, my ass? is it pretty hard to you or that mod guy ? no it isnt, its easy to you. 1 year ago simple as maths like differentiation seemed like a different language, until i learned it. the only reason people are finding step "hard" is because sixth formers these days are too busy partying. sixth formers fail in general. monkeys could do step, monkeys can do maths. calculators can do maths. end of debate. have a think about what i said ; " calculators can do maths
(emphasis mine)
No they can't. They can do arithmetic and calculation. Go prove the infinitude of primes with a calculator.
if you updated a calculator with enough neccessary information it would be able to calculate that.
No it wouldn't. It would drop out at numbers on the order of 100 digits or so, or when it ran out of RAM, or somewhere.
Even if you had a hypothetical quantum calculator, that could use subatomic particles to represent bits, it would have to halt after it ran out of particles in the universe. That's still not enough to prove there are an infinite number of primes.
You might claim maths is easy, but you seem to not have the faintest idea what it is.
In that case, could you solve a problem for me? If you take the zeta function ζ(s)=n=1∑∞ns1, then I've got a feeling that all of the non-trivial zeros of this function have real part one half, but I can't prove it.
Using a calculator, could you work out a proof for us? It's probably really easy and I'm just missing something simple that a calculator wouldn't.