The Student Room Logo

Oxford History Students and Applicants

Scroll to see replies

Original post by UnheardSounds
I'm not sure if I was right but for the second question I concluded that the source did not tell us that much as it was only about one tribe and you can't generalise that to the whole of the society in that area. Did anyone else do that?


Yeah I out that at the end, saying that it was a very narrow view of one tribe and thus wasn't a great source for commenting on all native American society
Reply 321
Original post by UnheardSounds
I'm not sure if I was right but for the second question I concluded that the source did not tell us that much as it was only about one tribe and you can't generalise that to the whole of the society in that area. Did anyone else do that?


I feel so idiotic for missing that out, as it's probably the most blindingly obvious issue to mention. :mad:
Original post by Stenner
I feel so idiotic for missing that out, as it's probably the most blindingly obvious issue to mention. :mad:


I was thinking I should have said this as soon as I came out. :frown:
Original post by Liles93
I was thinking I should have said this as soon as I came out. :frown:

*smug look*
Reply 324
A lot of you seem to have been discussing a single event - did anyone talk about government/governed relationship and the effect/relationship it had on (or with) a particular change? (I believe this was an option)

I.e. I talked about 1930 Germany and the Great Depression's effect as acting as a catalyst for the change from democracy to dictatorship, as tensions which had been building up in the 20s came to a boiling point and popularity of the Weimar Republic diminished in some sectors of society. However, I came to the conclusion that, although this was the base of change, there was a large, complex interaction of factors which led to the eventual Nazi Dictatorship including political intrigue, propaganda, terror etc.
Reply 325
Anyone interested in seeing the q.2 source again, for old time's sake and to get the real context as opposed to our feverish speculations? Just google:

cape breton father maillard

click the first result, the one that begins 'Page 36 - ...'

Most of our extract is on page 37.
Original post by Realism
A lot of you seem to have been discussing a single event - did anyone talk about government/governed relationship and the effect/relationship it had on (or with) a particular change? (I believe this was an option)

I.e. I talked about 1930 Germany and the Great Depression's effect as acting as a catalyst for the change from democracy to dictatorship, as tensions which had been building up in the 20s came to a boiling point and popularity of the Weimar Republic diminished in some sectors of society. However, I came to the conclusion that, although this was the base of change, there was a large, complex interaction of factors which led to the eventual Nazi Dictatorship including political intrigue, propaganda, terror etc.


American civil war is where it is at blud
Reply 327
Original post by giantlemon
how bad are the interview questions. it said on an example of a oxford student that was sent in an oxford email to look at that he was asked what are the economic philosophical and cultural aspects of a bananna. wtf? i know generally they ask normal questions but what the hell is that about?


They will probably concentrate on a period or issue that you have mentioned in your HAT/PS/essay and press you really hard on it to see how deep you can go. (That is not a euphamism by the way :colonhash:)
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 328
Original post by Realism
I talked about 1930 Germany and the Great Depression's effect as acting as a catalyst for the change from democracy to dictatorship, as tensions which had been building up in the 20s came to a boiling point and popularity of the Weimar Republic diminished in some sectors of society. However, I came to the conclusion that, although this was the base of change, there was a large, complex interaction of factors which led to the eventual Nazi Dictatorship including political intrigue, propaganda, terror etc.


I wrote on the exact same subject :smile:
Reply 329
Original post by giantlemon
how bad are the interview questions. it said on an example of a oxford student that was sent in an oxford email to look at that he was asked what are the economic philosophical and cultural aspects of a bananna. wtf? i know generally they ask normal questions but what the hell is that about?


While probably more suited to PPE or geography, it's not actually such a horrible question - it looks like it's really about the banana industry as a whole, so questions of fairtrade, worker exploitation, and whether it's right (& economically sustainable) to transport food over such vast distances would come in.
I seemingly had a moment of delusion during the HAT and wrote my essay about the 1903 Land Purchase Act. Fail >_<
Original post by flywithemma
haha no i'm not...i'm doing A level OCR History. :smile:


Nice UCAS choices :P
Original post by 4 I Murder Carrots Fun
I seemingly had a moment of delusion during the HAT and wrote my essay about the 1903 Land Purchase Act. Fail >_<


thats a pretty random topic haha
Original post by nofish4u
thats a pretty random topic haha


I didn't answer the question at all... I'm so screwed.
I wrote about the vested interests of the German princes clashing with views of the peasantry propelling the German Reformation forward. I really, really hope they have a very loose definition of government. Ah well. Most people on here seem reasonably confident that they did decently. It seems I am in the grimly resigned minority :frown:.
Original post by 4 I Murder Carrots Fun
I didn't answer the question at all... I'm so screwed.


what did you argue?
Reply 336
Original post by Realism
A lot of you seem to have been discussing a single event - did anyone talk about government/governed relationship and the effect/relationship it had on (or with) a particular change? (I believe this was an option)

I.e. I talked about 1930 Germany and the Great Depression's effect as acting as a catalyst for the change from democracy to dictatorship, as tensions which had been building up in the 20s came to a boiling point and popularity of the Weimar Republic diminished in some sectors of society. However, I came to the conclusion that, although this was the base of change, there was a large, complex interaction of factors which led to the eventual Nazi Dictatorship including political intrigue, propaganda, terror etc.



I did the New Deal specifically but spoke more generally about the Roosevelt administration... I only worried about this when i got out and everyone else who'd done it in my school had done the Reformation. Don't think I'll get an interview but I tried my best so oh well :s-smilie:
Original post by 4 I Murder Carrots Fun
Nice UCAS choices :P


thank you? :smile: I haven't had any offers yet, ahh, worried maybe I've aimed too high, but ooooh well.
where have you applied? guessing we have some in common?
Reply 338
Original post by gtfo
I wrote on the exact same subject :smile:

Did you write about the other factors which paved the way for Hitler's rise to power such as terror, political intrigue etc?
Reply 339
Original post by Realism
Did you write about the other factors which paved the way for Hitler's rise to power such as terror, political intrigue etc?


I did indeed. I wrote about harnessing popular resentment of Versailles, the backdrop of the great depression, and then how the government took control of the interaction itself with fear and intimidation.

I wasn't sure about the first half of my essay, but I'm pretty confident about the way terror/intrigue linked back to the question.

Quick Reply

Latest