my interview for physics and philosophy:
arrived at exeter college at noon sunday.
first interview 4.40pm sunday, physics.
two tutors, prof close and prof steane. asked questions: what are newtons 3 laws? why does this pen stay stationary on the table? what would happen if F = MV ? what are the forces acting on a plane in flight... derive an equation for the mass of air hitting the wings.
my verdict: ok, but could have done better. couldnt do f=mv question...(apparently all the planets would be attracted in a big crunch). took a while to do the last question (which actually isnt that hard). score myself 7/10
maths for physicists test, 9.30am monday
up bright and early for maths test... lasts one hour. quite managable; i estimate i got about 70-80% relative to other people complaining about how hard it was (despite their having done FM) feeling quite cheered up.
philosophy interview, 12.25pm monday.
supposed to have read an excerpt from philosophy article... failed to do so lol (missed the sign) and walked into interview without reading it. thankfully bloke explained it quickly and we got down to business. article was about a hypothetical lottery where healthy people are chosen at random to be painlessly executed to have their organs harvested... one persons organs might save 4 diseased people. philosophical discussion around obvious objections/implications. i enjoyed this a lot.
score myself 8 or 9/10
tuesday morning, 10am
go to a sample physics lecture on optics in clarendon lab... interesting.
12noon.
get told i have another 2 interviews at brasenose. feel ambivalent about it... have to unpack my suit doh.
philosophy interview, brasenose, 3.30pm
start off talking about book on my PS. tough (its a hard book) but enjoyable. then go through sheet of logical arguments looking for flaws... i remember this one as the last and hardest (might remember incorrectly though!)
"everything that is a unicorn has a horn
anything that has a horn is a unicorn
therefore all unicorns have horns
most (perhaps all) unicorns have horns
therefore at least one unicorn has a horn
therefore there is at least one unicorn"
we decided in the end it was the 'most...' line that was the problem. i enjoyed this a lot too, and the tutor was very friendly!
physics and maths interview, 5.20pm
beforehand watched end of american psycho 2. doesnt help to induce calm state of mind (chainsaw murder etc.)
told before i come into the room that im a borderline candidate and i might be admitted for either phys+phil or plain phys. makes me rather nervious.
2 tutors, one german woman and one english bloke. german asks me about wave-particle duality of light... examples of experiments to show both. i say youngs slits and photoelectric effect... she asks me to draw intensity graph of double slit... thats ok. then she asks me where id find a proton... i say the intensity graph is also a frequency density graph (got something right hurrah). bloke asks me some differentiation questions... got the first one alright, second one i couldnt do. and it was bloody easy (i will be kicking myself for it). it was basically dy/dx of ln (u). doh!! he then asks me integral of x^2 sinx between +-90 deg. i sketch graph, realise it comes to zero (although i should have seen that straight away.) then asks me what (sinx)/x equals as x --> 0. i say infinity... wrong. sketch circle... see that sinx apr. = x (though i knew that but forgot lol). realise =1. feel stupid. german asks me why when a car braking tilts towards the front. i muddle through to realise its because of a moment caused by the frictional force and the momentum. another pretty elementary question i should have spotted easily. end of interview... pathetically ask that i hope they take into consideration ive only done single maths. walk out feeling like ive failed really. score myself 5 or 6 /10
get onto train... got home about 11pm (not long ago!)
rate my chances of being accepeted... 50/50. was going quite well until last interview where i think i look quite stupid. hope they take my alevels, written work, gap year, maths test into account!!
decide on the train back that imperial will be just as good. being in oxford for the second time, the shine had kind of worn off. i realised its just another uni (albeit an excellent one) in lovely buildings. IC is probably where ill end up now, although ill know for sure by this sat/mon (hopefully).