This discussion is now closed.

Check out other Related discussions

- If X²+(3k+1)x+(4-9k) show that 9k²+42k-15
- An inspector calls lighting effect
- Romeo and juliet youth
- UBC requirements
- thesis statement for english lit
- chem question
- An Inspector Calls- How and why does Sheila change?
- CORMS in IGCSE BIOLOGY ??
- English Language (WJEC) NEA help
- psycho girl help
- epq source evaluations
- economics personal statement
- chemistry edexcel highest in middle east or UAE
- rant about the biggest embarrassment of my life
- Bf abandoned me at uni I’m so angry how do I feel better
- Please I am a handsome guy but I can't get girls I'm very shy to approach them
- St Mary’s GCSE English Language Equivalency Test
- Harvard referencing a PhD thesis and referring to my Appendix
- I’m too emotive, what do I say to her, to not make her worry or upset her???
- How do I stop being so shy around girls?

I'm looking over a past paper for OCR Additional Maths and one of the questions has this in it.

(ii) Hence show that the equation f(x) = 0 has no real roots.

(iv) Hence show that the equation g(x) = 0 has only one real root.

I'm not sure what it wants you to do; what is ment be a "real root"?

(ii) Hence show that the equation f(x) = 0 has no real roots.

(iv) Hence show that the equation g(x) = 0 has only one real root.

I'm not sure what it wants you to do; what is ment be a "real root"?

A root is where you find a value of x for which the equation = 0

e.g. If we took x^2 - 1=0

Then i could factorise that to (x + 1) (x - 1) And i'd know that it had two real roots of x=1 and x=-1

You need to use the discriminant (b^2 - 4ac)

If that is less than 0 then there are no real roots

If it is more than 0 then there are 2 real roots

If it = 0 then there is 1 real root

e.g. If we took x^2 - 1=0

Then i could factorise that to (x + 1) (x - 1) And i'd know that it had two real roots of x=1 and x=-1

You need to use the discriminant (b^2 - 4ac)

If that is less than 0 then there are no real roots

If it is more than 0 then there are 2 real roots

If it = 0 then there is 1 real root

A real root is basically the number of times the function crosses the x axis.

If it is a quadratic, by calculating b²-4ac you will see whether it equals, is less or more than 0. If it equals zero, there is one root. If it more than zero, two roots and if it is less than zero no roots.

If it is a quadratic, by calculating b²-4ac you will see whether it equals, is less or more than 0. If it equals zero, there is one root. If it more than zero, two roots and if it is less than zero no roots.

nimajneb

I'm looking over a past paper for OCR Additional Maths and one of the questions has this in it.

I'm not sure what it wants you to do; what is ment be a "real root"?

I'm not sure what it wants you to do; what is ment be a "real root"?

Well it depends on the nature of the functions f and g - say if they were quadratics you could look at the discriminant

For the general case you need to show, one way or another, that the curve y = f(x) and the x-axis cross at no point (or in the second case at one point)

The equations may, of course, have other complex roots - if you have met complex numbers

nimajneb

Ok, well the first part gives you "(x+3)²+2" and the lowest value that can give you is 2, which wouldn't cut the x axis; would it be ok writing that in the exam?

How would I find if it only has one real root (in the seccond case)?

How would I find if it only has one real root (in the seccond case)?

A quadratic equation ax^2 + bx + c = 0 has

(i) two distinct real roots when b^2 - 4ac >0

(ii) one repeated real root when b^2 - 4ac = 0

(iii) no real roots (they are a conjugate pair of complex numbers) when b^2 - 4ac < 0

You would expand (x+3)²+2 = x²+6x+9+2=x²+6x+11

And then you would find the discriminant: b²-4ac = 36-4*1*11=36-44=-8

If b²-4ac had equalled 0, it would have one root. However, it doesn't, and in fact it is less than zero, therefore there are no roots.

It is also valid to say that it has no roots since the lowest y value is 2, as this means that it would not touch the x axis.

And then you would find the discriminant: b²-4ac = 36-4*1*11=36-44=-8

If b²-4ac had equalled 0, it would have one root. However, it doesn't, and in fact it is less than zero, therefore there are no roots.

It is also valid to say that it has no roots since the lowest y value is 2, as this means that it would not touch the x axis.

Hmm, I'm still not quite sure how to go about it.

You are given that g(x) = x³ + 4x² - x -22

(iii) Show that g(2) = 0.

2³ + 4(2²) - 2 -22

=> 8 +16 -24 = 0

(iv) Hence show that the equation g(x) = 0 has only one real root.

Would I just say that g(2) = 0 so it just touchs the x axis giving only 1 root?

You are given that g(x) = x³ + 4x² - x -22

(iii) Show that g(2) = 0.

2³ + 4(2²) - 2 -22

=> 8 +16 -24 = 0

(iv) Hence show that the equation g(x) = 0 has only one real root.

Would I just say that g(2) = 0 so it just touchs the x axis giving only 1 root?

nimajneb

Hmm, I'm still not quite sure how to go about it.

Would I just say that g(2) = 0 so it just touchs the x axis giving only 1 root?

Would I just say that g(2) = 0 so it just touchs the x axis giving only 1 root?

No you need to do more than that. Showing g(2)=0 means it has a root but it might cross and recross at other points

Factorising the cubic you'll see

x^3 + 4x^2 - x - 22 = (x-2)(x^2 + 6x + 11)

and then showing (say using the discriminant again) that the quadratic factor has no real roots

nimajneb

Hmm, I'm still not quite sure how to go about it.

Would I just say that g(2) = 0 so it just touchs the x axis giving only 1 root?

Would I just say that g(2) = 0 so it just touchs the x axis giving only 1 root?

Well now that you know that g(2) = 0, then 2 is a root using the factor theorem you get (x-2) is a factor.

So now using algebraic long division, divide (x³+4x²-x-22) by (x-2)

when you do this you can factorise getting:

(x-2)(x²+6x+11)

Now this equation shows that (x-2) is factor, but (x²+6x+11) cannot be further factored, to prove this you can use the discriminant from quadratic formula and hence state that there is only one factor hence one root (2)

Ofcourse if you draw a very accurate graph of (x³+4x²-x-22) and show that it only touches x-axis once at 2, then this would also do.

nimajneb

I'm looking over a past paper for OCR Additional Maths and one of the questions has this in it.

I'm not sure what it wants you to do; what is ment be a "real root"?

I'm not sure what it wants you to do; what is ment be a "real root"?

if the graph crosses the x-axis teh eqtn has a real root - if it passes above it it is an unreal root - i.e imaginary in the sense that there is no physical crossing

- If X²+(3k+1)x+(4-9k) show that 9k²+42k-15
- An inspector calls lighting effect
- Romeo and juliet youth
- UBC requirements
- thesis statement for english lit
- chem question
- An Inspector Calls- How and why does Sheila change?
- CORMS in IGCSE BIOLOGY ??
- English Language (WJEC) NEA help
- psycho girl help
- epq source evaluations
- economics personal statement
- chemistry edexcel highest in middle east or UAE
- rant about the biggest embarrassment of my life
- Bf abandoned me at uni I’m so angry how do I feel better
- Please I am a handsome guy but I can't get girls I'm very shy to approach them
- St Mary’s GCSE English Language Equivalency Test
- Harvard referencing a PhD thesis and referring to my Appendix
- I’m too emotive, what do I say to her, to not make her worry or upset her???
- How do I stop being so shy around girls?

Latest

Trending

Last reply 2 weeks ago

can someone please explain what principle domain is and why the answer is a not c?Maths

0

13